Search content
Sort by

Showing 4 of 4 results by blockladder
Post
Topic
Board Games and rounds
Merits 13 from 8 users
Topic OP
Ok, here's a 1BTC puzzle.
by
blockladder
on 12/01/2019, 10:33:13 UTC
⭐ Merited by LoyceV (6) ,imjustagirl (1) ,vapourminer (1) ,Royse777 (1) ,TheBeardedBaby (1) ,coinlocket$ (1) ,redsn0w (1) ,jakelyson (1)
Ok, here's a 1BTC puzzle.

The question is the following:

WhyTheCombOfNatashaOtomoskiHas21Teeth?.txt

The solution is a 32 characters long plain-text (the private key).

Hint: 8 camel case english words, no special symbols

Happy puzzling!

G/cbms/K/DNzcRin5v2B03iXdbpdVoZbTebt7KG95j3FUqnJvcP9rDYcGpSV27RLspR7SlPjqma4h0tDAMwovIo=

txid 39ae730abf9190f1985a3600e35b6451efc51bfb885bc9d1c3b91d502de3907d
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Re: Block Ladder
by
blockladder
on 10/12/2015, 18:07:06 UTC
I will be doing the technical part in my spare time
I'm pretty confident this project will be successful and by that I mean
It will either be mineable as an demo (possibly later as an altcoin or even real Bitcoin).
I also set myself the ideal (don't promise) to either write a paper (I'm not an academic tho)
or at least provide a huge amount of live test data from a working system.

by working system I don't mean an altcoin (too ambitious) or even deployed
on real Bitcoin (one can dream right).

I want to have the minimal viable product e.g to have the block creation
operating at desired level (think 1 block per second) and the orphans
resolved, doublespends reverted.

Very difficult part will be the visualisation of the results.

Then once ready, we can maybe ask a core dev to comment on this I think that would be a nice
conclusion of the project.
Post
Topic
Board Development & Technical Discussion
Topic OP
Block Ladder
by
blockladder
on 10/12/2015, 11:21:18 UTC
been toying with ideas how to reduce orphan rate

this idea of exponential difficulty backoff comes to mind

in standing state the network quickly mines low difficulty blocks DIFF=1

when a fork of depth 1 is observed the DIFF=2 is raised and rate of block generation is halved
deeper forks than 1 cannot be healed.
the fork then can be merged by the successor block and potential doublespend conflicts are resolved
by a list of TX ID's to revert in successor block.

when fork is settled the block speed is slowly falls to maximum again
after two succesive blocks of DIFF=4, the difficulty is again halved to 2, then two more blocks to 1 etc.

obviously the fee doubles with difficulty also
larger blocks have 2x capacity and so on

malleability is fixed by seg witness or schnorr sig etc

https://github.com/blockladder/

opinions?
Post
Topic
Board Project Development
Re: [ANN] Bitcoinocracy.com - Sign your argument with your non-empty Bitcoin address
by
blockladder
on 10/12/2015, 10:44:52 UTC
a graph to each statement should be added where
can observe both positive, negative values of the statement evolving in time.

also,, how pubkeys are determined from P2PKH hashes is mystery