He said an exchange with volume. LOL
They have no volume worth any serious trader's time. SMH!

Well, if you guys feel that way (about total money supply) then this coin will go nowhere without any good exchanges carrying it.

You are wrong in thinking the total money supply is not a factor.  It needs to be on an BTC and/or LTC market, not this DODGE and shit market stuff. smh

Without reducing the total money supply, CENT will never get on a BTC and/or LTC market.  It really is that simple.

I was referring to the FUDDERS like you. :SMH

Wow, some people just have sad lives don't they.

Yes, but the total money supply needs to be addressed.  No exchange with any good volume will think about adding this without the being changed first.

Just divide the total money supply by 10k and call it CENT2 already.  That's the only real way to go right now, plain and simple.

+1
Keep at it.

Why a new coin?  Bad idea. Just call it CENT2.

Agreed that it needs to be planned out and done correctly.  It has been done before with SAT to SAT2.

Without lowering the total money supply, this coin will never be on exchanges like Cryptsy, Bittrex, MintPal, etc. with the trading volume needed for this coin.  Ecoinfund and Swisscex just aren't cutting it.

Divide total supply by 10k is the next step I believe.

The current money supply scares people off.

Hi Rozu,

Any ideas when you are going to implement the 10k division of money supply and go CENT2?

Really need this if we want an exchange like Crytpsy or MintPal to think about adding it.

Thanks!

Evidently, there is something lost in translation and you have no idea what Petr1fied is trying to say and get done.  Nor can you express what you mean properly due to it being lost in translation.

I hope no one takes suggestions on how to CENTS' future from you myweblife as I'm not sure he grasps how things are handled in todays exchanges.

So, after reading the posts you just made, I'll say what Petr1fied is too much of a gentlemen to say (I'm hoping this doesn't get lost in translation either)...

YOU ARE A FUCKING IDIOT! 

Yes, exactly.  DO NOT changed the name and logo.  Only chance of getting back on Cryptsy is with a v2 of Pennies.  CENT2 sounds great to me and like Petr1fied said, there is now a precedent at Cryptsy to get it done.

Keep up the hard work Rozu!

At first I thought it was a language or translation barrier, but then I realized most of you fucktards have no business trading coins in the crypto world.  FFS, research before you start typing through your assholes!

Now, with that...

Divide by 10,000 with a client update (hard fork if necessary) and leave the name alone!

I still don't understand why people can't figure out that at this point doing this is a necessity for CENT to even begin to revive.

It is really quite a simple thing to imagine...try it!

In case anyone is running 6970 cards:

After trying numerous configs, this is my setup using the modded sph-sgminer for 6xxx/5xxx cards...

sgminer -k x13modold -o stratum+tcp://multipool.cloakcoin.com:8066 -u C4ebM1pcKtwfSseLxQsMBrCXD8WB9DqFCW -p x -w 256 -I 20 -g 5 -s 5 -E 25 -Q 2 --thread-concurrency 8192 --lookup-gap 2 --no-submit-stale --gpu-engine 955 --gpu-memclock 1475 --gpu-vddc 1.05 --gpu-fan 72 --gpu-powertune 20

Pulling ~1.45-1.55 MH/s per card.

Hope it helps someone get the most out of their cards  

Please feel free to tip a thanks at Cryptsy to my trade key below  

Rozu,

You have any plans for shrinking the total number of CENT?

The current money supply of ~49 Trillion would look more pleasant to exchanges if it was ~4.9 Billion.

I'm not sure any good exchanges with volume will want to add it without that happening.

Keep up the good work!

Large buy on Cryptsy....someone knows something?

That's funny!  Not only did it never come back up, the site is gone.

Yes, remove the 1 bil limitation.  There shouldn't even be a discussion on this one.  Make 10.3.3 a mandate and have all exchanges update to it.

...And thanks for your hard work!

Ok, thanks for the info.  Glad I'm not the only one. Also, 10.3.3 client?

@Rozu
Can you add peer info/connections to the blockchain viewer?  Sure would be nice to click on the number under "Connections:" on that page and have it take us to a list of peers

Stake working ok for anyone on 10.3.2 ?
My stake never confirms properly.  Goes from Unconfirmed (1 of 6 confirms) to Offline (0 confirms).

Edit: Even after 3 and 4 confirms it will get booted to Offline.  Trans IDs never get recognized by the crawler.  This has happened to dozens of transactions trying to stake so far.  I have shutdown my client until I know everything is ok.

I only show 2 or 3 connections for my client at any given time.  We need more nodes on the new client if this is going to succeed.