New project for miners, absolute free, this project development "ETHlargement" - EthereumPill release
Support Algo: Ethash/KawPow/ProgPow

Download: https://ethereumpill.info/ProjectEthereumPill.zip

Virustotal: https://www.virustotal.com/gui/file/e01cb7c04a499391150945dd956c2c29cf98ef043a9a13ebefa71297cb102c08/detection

Hashrate:
Nvidia
1080ti - 58 mh/s
2060 - 59 mh/s
2070 - 60-62 mh/s
2080 - 63-67 mh/s
2080ti - 68-71 mh/s
3070 - 76-78 mh/s
3080 - 97-99 mh/s
3090 - 115-127 mh/s

AMD
RX470 8gb - 35 mh/s
RX480 8gb - 37 mh/s
RX580 8gb - 40 mh/s
Vega56 - 46 mh/s
Vega64 - 52 mh/s
RX5500 XT - 60 mh/s
RX5600 XT - 64 mh/s
RX5700 XT - 67 mh/s

P.S.: the project is being drowned by competitors, don't trust anyone, check the information yourself

I signed up and created a profile.  When selecting my profile, I see nothing.  Not the photo I uploaded during signup nor anything having to do with the various receive addresses I entered.  What gives?  I'm using Firefox, if that matters at all.

Edit:  OK, I see things correctly at http://myca.is/bmulcahy but not when signed in at https://app.mycryptoaddress.me/.  Pretty slick idea though!

Hey All,

I have received a few PMs about this but can't respond because of the forum's rules (1 PM/hour, 2 PMs/day -- crazy, right?). Please hit me up via email at bmulcahy@gmail.com or on Reddit as asaltandbuttering. Or, we can discuss right here on the forum. That way has the added benefit of increasing my post count so that I can escape these draconian newbie PM limits!

Peace,
bmulcahy

I have a little over 138 LBTC that I'd be happy to sell for 0.0035 BTC/LBTC.  Any takers?  Escrow preferred but negotiable if you have a proven history of honoring deals.

Btcdiv.com indicates that it is being traded on btctrade.im, ZB.com, EXX.com and Coinegg.com, although none of them allow deposits yet.  People are just trading what they got from having BTC in the exchange at the time of the fork.

I have 1k SEM to sell @12k satoshis.  Cartagene, I tried PMing you but you are not accepting messages from newbies.  Escrow required.

Thanks a lot, dude!  Sent a list of keys and received BCD and SBTC in under 24 hours.  Looking forward to getting UBTC & S2X soon!

Hello bitcointalk,

I'm a long-time lurker, seldom poster.  Thanks to so many of you for your clear thinking and exposition over the years.  I am posting here because I do not know where else I might share this idea and it seems (to me, at least) to be very important.

Right now, advertisers have enormous influence over the public narrative and they shouldn't be trusted.  They are a necessary evil who facilitate the conversion of page-views into revenue for most web-based companies.  Users universally hate advertising and go to great lengths to avoid exposure to it (e.g., ad-blockers, DVRs, etc).  These users end up being leeches that consume content but do not support the content creators.  The users might not mind supporting the content creators, they just hate seeing ads and other routes of paying for content are too tedious.

This is where in-browser mining comes in.  Imagine a browser plug-in, which is open-source and therefore publicly auditable, that allows users to allocate some portion of their CPU for javascript mining, anywhere from 0 to 99%, it's their choice.  Then, on a per-site basis, the user can contribute, say, 10% of their allocated resources to site A, 50% to B, and 40% to C, or any other ranking/weighting scheme.  Sites A, B, and C would have to opt-in by including javascript that is validated by the plugin (preventing sneaky attempts to use more resources than the user wants and serving as an incentive for sites to opt-in).  Users running the plugin would form a mining pool that would pay-out to the sites based on addresses that they would include in their javascript.

The important part is to have this functional layer be trustworthy (i.e., open-source, nothing proprietary).  I say this because of the recent issue with the pirate bay, in which they enabled a javascript miner that used up 100% of visitors CPU, and the response to it.  Many people felt that what they had done was sneaky and unethical.  This is how entrenched interests (i.e., advertisers) will try to frame this potential competitor: as a malicious script aimed at stealing from you.  Therefore, a trusted intermediary that is opt-in for both users and websites is the best way forward.  This should appeal to web-businesses because it will turn leeches (i.e., folks using ad-block) into paying customers and it should appeal to users because it allows them to passively pay for internet content and services by way of their power bill while still avoiding exposure to ads.

Listen bitcointalkers!  This is the future, I am certain of it.  I have read through a calculation and recognize that, right now, javascript mining is not lucrative enough to truly challenge online advertising, but we all know that will change.  The future connects content creators straight to content consumers with no middle-men trying to convince me my life sucks because I haven't bought their product.  This is a foundational plank in the future shaped by the crypto-revolution.  A world without advertisers pressuring websites to filter their content to fit their desired narrative.

I am posting this in hopes that someone might be able to help me think through how to proceed.  Despite my clumsy language here, I am not a complete moron.  I have some skill as a programmer and will likely try to make this happen whether anyone else thinks it's a good idea or not.  But, if you're reading this and see the potential here like I do, please tell me your thoughts.  The important part is that the vested interests don't hijack the narrative and convince your average ad-blocking Joe that javascript mining is inherently malicious.  This idea needs marketing and polished execution, I hope you all agree!

I have used this service for years and have run into my first problem.  The withdrawal that I scheduled three days ago was fulfilled with transactions using too small a miners' fee given the current transaction pool.  These transactions are still unconfirmed three days later.  I have messaged support through their site but have not yet received any response.  I am posting here as a warning to others.  I will update this post if I hear back from them.

Edit:  After four days, the transactions did confirm thanks to a magnanimous miner.  I still have not received any response from the Bitcoin Fog 'crew'.  I will be using a different mixing service from now on and advise others to do the same.

I love this idea.  The potential of Bitcoin for combating corruption and waste is, to me, one of its most exciting features.  There is a huge amount of waste and corruption in healthcare.

An update:

The coins did eventually show up and I lost them betting 

Hello fellow noobs,

Lacking a better idea for a first post, I figured I'd just post regarding the reason I signed up here.  I found bitlucky.io via Google (bitcoin lottery) and thought I'd give it a try out of curiosity.

I transferred 40mBTC to the deposit address given which never showed up in my account.  The transaction has now been confirmed 13 times and the output has been spent.  Just thought I'd post a warning here for anyone else.  Hopefully, I can PM bitcointalk.org member sufisu (the creator of the site) once my noob restrictions have been lifted and see what the deal is.  I hope he is acting in good faith and is just having some technical trouble at the moment.

Anyway, cheers fellow noobs!