When they were first removed in July, they claimed technical problems. You can see the posts here.
For a while they kept bringing them back for like a day or 2 at a time and pausing them again. Eventually they just stopped.
The other free daily spins that we get on email are also not as regular.

Maybe its not the bitcoin price. Maybe its the FUN token price that is too low. They probably decided that the investment needed to make in FUN to get so many free spins is actually too low for the benefit you get.
And thats probably true. Just be clear about it and stop advertising services you dont provide

I am a FUN holder. I have still enough to play without captcha but sold the rest since the most important benefit of free spins has been removed.

They said the free spins were removed due to problems but that makes no sense. It was removed because the bitcoin price got too high and it was too costly for them to keep those up.
It's been over 7 months now. They came back briefly for a while, in the first few weeks, for a day or two at a time and then lost again. It was all just excuses. Even daily free spins are rarer now.

I wouldn't mind if they were honest about it, but they are not. They still advertise it to attract people to their FUN token program. That's unacceptable

There is nothing to fix cause it's working as intended (that is, not at all)
It was never a technical problem

Will next week's payment be for 200k total tokens for the 2 weeks or just 100k?

The "problem" (if it is indeed one) will have appeared long before 2140.
After 3 more halvings, the block reward will be less than 1 btc, and after another 3, it will be less than 0.1.
So in the next 20-25 years, it will be comparable to current transaction fees.

It's an unpopular opinion, but I don't think having a constant block reward of, say 1 btc after sufficient halvings would have been a bad idea. Inflation would be minimal and predictable.
But I do think it's too late now to implement it as it would do more harm than good, due to FUD as it would be painted as a betrayal to the golden initial rules. So It's a moot point.

Still, after 20 years I expect most daily transactions to have crossed over to the lightning network, leaving layer 1 just for settlements, opening and closing channels, or exceptional, large and costly transactions.
I think it's totally sustainable if the ecosystem is strong.

You must use the DEX. It matches buyers and sellers and executes atomic swaps directly on the chains with minimal fees. No KYC and no third parties.
The drawback is that currently, you need to be running full nodes on both coins as well as the DEX software which has a web interface to interact with. And also that minimum trade quantity is 40dcr.
I have a dedicated linux box for those things, but I understand this is more trouble that most people would put up with.
They say the next version will be more accessible and work with light nodes, maybe directly through decrediton.

The airdrop was during launch. You can't get it now
I wasn't aware it was delisted from Poloniex. Then again, I wasn't aware that Polonex even exists still

Actually it's quite clear. He has a lot to gain from this model with little effort. And up to now there were a lot of people to play along and lose their money on it

Don't pay any attention to his ramblings, or just look at all his past posts for fun to see for yourself

As for the price of decred, it's quite typical. The coin has a dedicated, but small following unfortunately. It has its ups and downs relative to bitcoin, but ultimately doesn't seem able keep up with it, though it does OK in fiat terms.

Still I expect more upsides (wrt bitcoin always), particularly when bitcoin drops again or remains stable.

The best feature of this coin is the DEX which works really well. It's the only coin I can still trade 100% anonymously with near zero fees and with full custody control.

So these ups and downs are really just opportunities

Fine but if we are to swap them for something else we probably will need a functioning wallet.
Mine hasn't synced for many months. It just won't work.

or at least let us sign a message to prove our balance

👉 The Minereum Fee Share Holders (ETH Chain) will receive 50% of all the Fees collected from the new Fee Shares Sale on the Binance Smart Chain. For example if 10,000 BNB are collected during the BSC Fee Shares Sale, 5000 BNB will be distributed to the Minereum Fee Share Holders (ETH Chain). In addition to that they will receive all the future fees collected from Bazarswap (ETH Chain) and Coinleet as announced before.

How can ETH chain fee shareholders receive BNB fees collected?
1) Will they be converted to ETH and distributed?
or
2) Will they be received on the binance chain on the equivalent addresses (since the chains have identical addresses)

dcrstats.com has disappeared

can we have updated links to latest binaries and peer list?

I can't even sync, last block for me was Nov 20

Any info whatsoever?
Tokens net is closing down so the swap is impossible

He said that months ago. Not even a word since.
Consider this or my previous post the question.
When are we gonna get an update about what the plan is, let alone when we actually get some compensation and of what sort?

Still no update about stakeholders. Their rewards stopped for months now

How can anyone trust a project that makes such decisions with not excuse or clear plans to cover their losses?

I think kucoin and binance still allow at least some trading without KYC.
Unless that has changed recently.
I don't know what the withdrawal fee is but it can't be worse than btc or eth these days

Most major exchanges have it listed

This obsession with the unit price makes me wonder sometimes.

bitcoin has 100 million satoshis each. In fact, at the protocol level there are only satoshis. The bitcoin software does not care about whole bitcoins. It only cares about satoshis.

The bitcoin "unit" is actually just a convention!

Still, there are valid questions to be asked

1) Would it have been different (for better or worse) if the decimal point was chosen to be further to the right? Really even now it's little more that changing what the client shows as "one" bitcoin.
  Back when the price of one unit was just cents this would have been a moot point. Now I'm not so sure. Unit bias is a real thing.

2) Should it be considered in the future to increase the decimal points to the right? Effectively 10x all the satoshi in existence (the equivalent of 1 decimal point increase)
  This is not really an increase in supply as all balances AND past transactions would see that increase. What it would do is add precision to allow for even smaller transfers of value and maybe more granularity in fees

Are you swapping into an existing coin or a new blockchain?

Is the new swapped coin going to be maintained by you or a new dev team?