Actually it is true in Garza Speak. Garza paid a salesman $200 K as a gift to Musk who in turned authorized the salesman to gift Homero a new Tesla. Easy Peasy in the land of GAW.

https://hashtalk.org/topic/36351/a-proposal-two-birds-with-one-stone-the-honors-program



http://i60.tinypic.com/15q1zlf.png

Yeah because the whole point of promising 20 dollars per paycoin is that you can get around it by now giving people 20 dollars *worth* of paycoin per paycoin.

Problem solved!

I reached the same conclusion as soon as he declared he was the one who mined the genesis block.

At this point I simply do not care anymore. I will not be moving a finger until I see some resolution. They ve started throwing trash at each other and who know what is the truth here.

So connecting the dots it appears to me that:

1) Matt caught Josh dumping "a few hundred thousand" XPY (appears to be admitted by Josh)

2) Josh claims that the dumps were to pay him (Josh) back for >> 1 million he has invested of his own money (putting aside the fact that even if true, it would be a major problem for Josh to try to repay his insider loan before paying creditors; in legal jingo either a "preference" or "fraudulent conveyance")

3) Matt tells Josh to turn over the PCs and coins, under threat of exposing Josh

4) Josh signs agreement to turn over coins and PCs to Matt, Foundation, etc.

5) Matt et al come out with a proposal to remove the extreme hyperinflating stakers down to 100% (with no cumulative staking interest)

6) Now Josh claims that he was extorted into signing agreement (as an aside, Josh really means "duress" as a defense to contract formation; and the duress defense is extraordinarily hard to win on absent extreme circumstances that effectively "deprive the contracting party of free choice" such as physical threats, fraud, etc.)

hope you'll not gettin mad about my screens here, but all of them must be collected for posterity...

http://s8.postimg.org/6d3xij91x/lol12.jpg

But he's learned from his mistakes and is not promising $20 anymore. Except in the most vague and sleazy ways, e.g. CoinStand.

Today I received 2 payments that appear to have come from PBM. One was the amount shown as current payout. The second was substantially larger ... Anyone else seeing similar ?

To me it looks like 3.5 BTC is missing. If you add up all the transactions that were paid out you get a total of ~2.7 BTC, but the wallet received 6.2 BTC.

If you look through the transaction list you will see that some addresses are getting paid multiple times for only a single transaction.

The address: 19fpsJn8hdpuPkqoK1pDQgpr2HurpXH8r1 for instance got paid 12 times for only 4 deposits. That's 3 times the amount they should have been paid. Ref: https://blockchain.info/address/19fpsJn8hdpuPkqoK1pDQgpr2HurpXH8r1

There are a lot more inconsistencies with this site. OP you need a new coder, your current one has no clue what the @#$! he is doing and is losing everyone's money.