Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 159 results by btcethgold
Hello all members here.
I want advice from all veterans here as what best strategy can be for BTC selling. I want to sell at every pump and buy on every dump. How can one make sure he does not lose it.
What if 4 years cycle is not here this time.
What approach one should get here.
Thanks
I want advice from all veterans here as what best strategy can be for BTC selling. I want to sell at every pump and buy on every dump. How can one make sure he does not lose it.
What if 4 years cycle is not here this time.
What approach one should get here.
Thanks
Hello all BTC hodlers here.
I have some queries about Btc security.
1. Those using Trezor, what additional security they can do to make sure they are safe apart from trezor PIN
2. It sounds weird but when one creates 12 keys in any btc wallet then either user knows his 12 words or this wallet knows these 12 words.
Is it it possible to hack this 12 word from btc wallet software.
ANY OTHER tips for making trezor safe.
Thanks
I have some queries about Btc security.
1. Those using Trezor, what additional security they can do to make sure they are safe apart from trezor PIN
2. It sounds weird but when one creates 12 keys in any btc wallet then either user knows his 12 words or this wallet knows these 12 words.
Is it it possible to hack this 12 word from btc wallet software.
ANY OTHER tips for making trezor safe.
Thanks
Thanks mate.
Actually first i transferred 0.03 to my exchange address which was successful. but it also created one more transfer within same transaction of BTC 1.06 to another address.
now my address in trezor, when checked in blockchain explorer showed 1.06 btc less so i got worried. but when i checked my trezor balance then i had full amount there.
now to check again i tried to exchange 0.01 btc to eth within trezor itself.
now again two transfers were created one with 0.01 and another with 1.06 btc.
i have got eth in my trezor and the btc balance is also showing correct in trezor but that first address where i had all btcs now showing 2 btc less in blockchain explorer.
but in trezor everything is showing as correct.
i am sure this is something about changing address as my friend omega mentioned above.
Actually first i transferred 0.03 to my exchange address which was successful. but it also created one more transfer within same transaction of BTC 1.06 to another address.
now my address in trezor, when checked in blockchain explorer showed 1.06 btc less so i got worried. but when i checked my trezor balance then i had full amount there.
now to check again i tried to exchange 0.01 btc to eth within trezor itself.
now again two transfers were created one with 0.01 and another with 1.06 btc.
i have got eth in my trezor and the btc balance is also showing correct in trezor but that first address where i had all btcs now showing 2 btc less in blockchain explorer.
but in trezor everything is showing as correct.
i am sure this is something about changing address as my friend omega mentioned above.
Thanks a million my friend.
i m feeling very relaxed. but could you tell me where can i read more about this function.
as i again sent 0.1 btc then again it created another transaction with BTC 1.06
i m feeling very relaxed. but could you tell me where can i read more about this function.
as i again sent 0.1 btc then again it created another transaction with BTC 1.06
Hello All Friends,
I have BTCs in my Trezor Wallet,
Today i first checked if i am able to send btc to exchange successfully or not.
I sent 0.03 BTC to my binance address. This went smoothly. but to my shock there was one more transaction created along with this transaction with BTC 1.06 going to another address.
now when i check my BTC address on blockchain then it showed 1 BTC less but when i check my balance in Trezor then its shows full balance.
how is it possible.
please help me in understanding it. though i have asked the same in trezor forum too.
I have BTCs in my Trezor Wallet,
Today i first checked if i am able to send btc to exchange successfully or not.
I sent 0.03 BTC to my binance address. This went smoothly. but to my shock there was one more transaction created along with this transaction with BTC 1.06 going to another address.
now when i check my BTC address on blockchain then it showed 1 BTC less but when i check my balance in Trezor then its shows full balance.
how is it possible.
please help me in understanding it. though i have asked the same in trezor forum too.
Hello Friends,
As there are many Senior members who have vast knowledge in crypto. i request to all of you please put comments what can be added in an Ecosystem based on Polkadot.
it can include :
Dex built on polka
lending, staking
Wallet on polka
NFT marketing place on polka
please suggest more what can be achieved to make a great Polka Ecosystem
thanks.
As there are many Senior members who have vast knowledge in crypto. i request to all of you please put comments what can be added in an Ecosystem based on Polkadot.
it can include :
Dex built on polka
lending, staking
Wallet on polka
NFT marketing place on polka
please suggest more what can be achieved to make a great Polka Ecosystem
thanks.
yes i agree, thanks for the reply.
Your question has many answers, and not all of them will be wrong because the perception of digital currencies differs from one person to another.
We are in a cryptocurrency community so there will be a preference for privacy, some tech features, security and fees VS ease of use, and simplicity.
So, if your wallet is for beginners, make sure that it is easy to use, safe, supports a lot of altcoins, and then you can focus on the rest of the features over time.
We are in a cryptocurrency community so there will be a preference for privacy, some tech features, security and fees VS ease of use, and simplicity.
So, if your wallet is for beginners, make sure that it is easy to use, safe, supports a lot of altcoins, and then you can focus on the rest of the features over time.
sure. i will keep this in mind. and thanks for all the posts here.
here are the answers to your questions:
HD: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deterministic_wallet
SVP: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability#Simplified_payment_verification
RBF: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Replace_by_fee
next time you have questions like these, it's always a good idear to simply use google
.
HD: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Deterministic_wallet
SVP: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Scalability#Simplified_payment_verification
RBF: https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Replace_by_fee
next time you have questions like these, it's always a good idear to simply use google
.Hello friend,
please tell what do you mean by SPV, RBF. thanks.
please tell what do you mean by SPV, RBF. thanks.
I'd add to @mocacinno pretty good list:
* [very important] support top hardware wallets (at least Ledger and Trezor)
* [important] the seed should work with other wallets too
* [important] it should be SPV since most users don't have the patience to download the blockchain
* [less important] allow RBF easily
* [less important] show the amount also in fiat (at least USD) <- I find this very useful for newbies that could get confused about how much money they send
The discussion on UI can be wide, but I don't want to write so much. I'd modify this on that on Electrum's UI and behavior (I'd go back to the old handling of SpendFrom, I'd default to BTC not mBTC, ...) and I'd add an option for simpler view for newbies.
All in all I do like Electrum for PC, but mostly the older version. So I'd start with that, I'd change a little here and there and I'll try to find ways to make it less confusing for starters.
* [very important] support top hardware wallets (at least Ledger and Trezor)
* [important] the seed should work with other wallets too
* [important] it should be SPV since most users don't have the patience to download the blockchain
* [less important] allow RBF easily
* [less important] show the amount also in fiat (at least USD) <- I find this very useful for newbies that could get confused about how much money they send
The discussion on UI can be wide, but I don't want to write so much. I'd modify this on that on Electrum's UI and behavior (I'd go back to the old handling of SpendFrom, I'd default to BTC not mBTC, ...) and I'd add an option for simpler view for newbies.
All in all I do like Electrum for PC, but mostly the older version. So I'd start with that, I'd change a little here and there and I'll try to find ways to make it less confusing for starters.
Hello Mocacinno,
what do you mean by HD wallet. thanks for all the inputs.
what do you mean by HD wallet. thanks for all the inputs.
When it comes to features:
There are more features, but i probably wouldn't even want to use a wallet that doesn't offer above features as a bare minimum.
The UX, i don't care about... I use core from the command line, and electrum aswell... Sure, a gui is nice sometimes, and if you want to create a wallet that's newbie-friendly you really need one... But if you create a wallet for older users, i wouldn't worry about the ux all that much (at least, that's my personal feeling, i know a lot of old-timers that DO care about UI/UX)
- it has to be a HD wallet: i don't want to make backups of my wallet file every couple of days
- it has to be encrypted
- native segwit
- coin control features: i have to be able to pick the unspent outputs i want to use as an input
- tx control features: i want to define the change address, or let the wallet derive a change address for me, i want full control over the fee (i want to set the exact amount of sat/vbyte and have the wallet make a couple of suggestions aswell), i want to be able to create unsigned transactions or sign unsigned transaction i constructed outside of the wallet
- i want to be able to sign messages
- the wallet has to be open source, signature has to be available
- i have to be able to build the wallet on *nix
There are more features, but i probably wouldn't even want to use a wallet that doesn't offer above features as a bare minimum.
The UX, i don't care about... I use core from the command line, and electrum aswell... Sure, a gui is nice sometimes, and if you want to create a wallet that's newbie-friendly you really need one... But if you create a wallet for older users, i wouldn't worry about the ux all that much (at least, that's my personal feeling, i know a lot of old-timers that DO care about UI/UX)
Hello All,
As there are very good wallets already in the market like Trust Wallet, Exodus etc. I want to know there two things from the user's experience
1: What features you want to see in a wallet which is not in other ones
2: How User Interface or User's experience can be improved in this wallet.
You all are requested to put your great thoughtful inputs again.
Thanks in advance to everyone who contributes here.
As there are very good wallets already in the market like Trust Wallet, Exodus etc. I want to know there two things from the user's experience
1: What features you want to see in a wallet which is not in other ones
2: How User Interface or User's experience can be improved in this wallet.
You all are requested to put your great thoughtful inputs again.
Thanks in advance to everyone who contributes here.
Thanks to both of you. Yes it mainly depends on the team's allocations and locking of supply.
also what a new Dex can offer to new listings that makes them apart from other dexes.
hope to hear more solutions.
also what a new Dex can offer to new listings that makes them apart from other dexes.
hope to hear more solutions.