Yes, swap completed after good communication.
But we don't have the BSC chain integrated yet ( We have a node running already for them but no backend code yet ).
So withdrawals are manual and can take up to 24 hours.
No deposits as long BSC is not integrated.

At the moment we can't support the swap.
We created a new wallet 18 days ago, verified the transactions on the blockexplorer and now it shows last block 59 days ago.
We can't load the snapshot they made as that was probably made with a node compiled with different libs.
The new wallet was created because the old became too slow from too many staking transactions.
We paid out staking rewards to our users and probably those are now all invalidated by a backdated hardfork.
We was contacted about the swap 3 days ago and we have no way to verify if we're now on the correct chain ( Like no one else has ).

Fixed.
TRI was detected as being on the wrong chain as the output from the explorer we use to compare blockhashes outputs them now in quotes.
So it was like:
Triangles is on the wrong chain! f8f6ff0b2c1a919786af63065c13d3d96f26de7bdaaa6627e341075f59d167b4 "f8f6ff0b2c1a919786af63065c13d3d96f26de7bdaaa6627e341075f59d167b4"

If a coin is detected on the wrong chain then withdrawals and staking is disabled automated.
I updated the code and enabled withdrawals and staking again.
Triangles is on the correct chain Local Hash: f8f6ff0b2c1a919786af63065c13d3d96f26de7bdaaa6627e341075f59d167b4 Remote Hash: f8f6ff0b2c1a919786af63065c13d3d96f26de7bdaaa6627e341075f59d167b4

Username Casimir1904

The algo wont be changed, and can't be changed for a single coin with the current codebase.
The faucet is kept pretty simple in code and functions.
The best way to increase the claim rewards is to deposit TRI to stake them, the more staked the bigger the faucet balance grows.
100% of the staking fees goes to the faucet.

The algo is simple.
Faucet balance /10k = Claim amount. Updated every 15 minutes.
The faucet is refilled from the staking fee ( 2% ).
If a coin is low it is less claimed and the balance can grow.
The more a coin is staked the more goes to the faucet as well.

Ixcoin can still be traded on btcpop.co
We don't have much volume yet but working hard on a full recode with better exchange engine, UI and API.

You can trade CLAM at btcpop.
We also have a faucet and you'll get staking rewards for all PoS coins you hold ( also in sell orders ).

You lost access to your account, and support was helping you to get access back to your account.

You never replied back with the code that was sent via sms to you.
Even with your acting like a 10y old child our support was trying to help you.

Your Support tickets was all like your first one:
"How can I activate my account? you never send me nothing to my email address? well I don't really need this account anyway, so fuck yall"

404 is listed on Btcpop.
Auto staking of all your holdings ( also in sell orders ).
Faucet: https://btcpop.co/Faucet/
Faucet claims are added to you btcpop account once a day, pending faucet claims don't get staking rewards.
Staking fee = 2% and is for 100% used to fund the Faucet.

First PoS Rewards should show up in a week, also if you deposit later you would get a part of it.
PoS reward is calculated like:
PoS Reward * 0.98 / all coins in user balances * your holdings = Your reward.

I'll try tomorrow, currently busy with other work.

creation and offline wallets.
Inputs are on the BCH chain but that shouldn't matter ( would just matter when debugging with a watch only copy ).

No, depends on what inputs I select in coin control... I've 3 inputs left 1 shows the first error and the other 2 the 2nd error.
I tried them also 1 by 1.

It's a huge wallet with currently 56k addresses, It had over 7500 Inputs when I started to move out ( Moved them to p2pkh addresses for easier splitting on the possible split happening today ).

I'm still receiving on that wallet else I would be okay to send it to you so you could easier debug, I don't care too much about the 3 inputs stuck, just annoying to move in the feature as I always would need to do coin control and deselect the inputs with issues.

I could try to import the privkeys in a new armory wallet and see if it will work then, but not sure if armory would "create" the p2sh version then or just p2pkh...

0.96.4-Beta

@Droak no not Bcash, but Bitcoin Cash transactions and they work with Armory, I provided a ( non clean and not optimal ) hack for BitcoinABC so Armory can connect and keeps connected, but even without, it would work to create and sign transactions, you would just need to manual broadcast the raw transaction.

Edit:
I built my self and also tried the latest .deb ( armory_0.96.4_amd64_gcc4.7_noasm.deb )

I've some inputs on p2sh addresses and I'm not able to spend them.

Was really a pain to move coins from a wallet with 7500+ Inputs when there 3 Inputs that causes issues...



Inputs are on the BCH chain and are still viewable on blockexplorers, I did several rescans and also full rebuilds.
As those are p2sh addresses its not trivial to just export the privkey and spend via another wallet.

You can export keys in offline mode, no need to sync with the network for that.

Good luck on waiting for that.
I started the recovery months back and never got a reply...

What kind of spam did you receive?
You could contact support@btcpop.co
We don't send out spam and whe I took over the site the code was really bad, no bruteforce protection and stuff like that so it would've send out emails on every login attempt.
Now there is bruteforce protection and you can even set in your profile what kind of emails you want to receive.
Every newsletter only goes to members and they have an opt out link, once opted out you'll never receive Newsletters again.

There is still a lot work to do and we work hard to make it a great project and solve all the mess the founder created, and I think we do a pretty good job there.
I covered all user balances from my own money ( That time more than 1500 BTC + lot altcoins ).
I published a signed coldwallet that covers the user balances close to 4 times now and was never touched since I own the site and there was ~1200 BTC moved out since I own it. ( only moved for coin splits but every time new message signed after doing so ).

The only negative ratings you find since mid 2016 are from scammers who failed to run with a lot of coins or succeeded but failed to steal more.
Our support always answers within max 12 hours.
If there are any wallet issues or whatever they get fixed in short time ( few minutes to few hours ).

I still put a lot of my own money into this project as it isn't profitable yet so just wondering what it makes a garbage site?
Meanwhile lot other p2p lending sites are gone, one of them with the owner defaulted on loans.

The only way you could receive emails is by signing up on our site, if you never did then probably someone else did and in the past there was no working email confirmation ( that was also fixed pretty quick ).

If you send a support ticket to support@btcpop.co I'll remove your account and or blacklist your email so there would be never mails going out to you again.

Faucetcollector seems to be a popular bot to claim from a lot of faucets, its easy to spot and auto ban.
You can check if you faucet is on: faucetcollector.com/faucets download the script and search how it finds your login/claim button.
Make a new claim button it can't find and make a hidden button with the patterns it would find.
Whenever someone clicks on the hidden button you know its the bot and you can auto flag the account/ip.

I suggest you auto ban/flag them but still return success so a lot botters could be catched without them knowing.

Ofc the bots will update against it but if you just regular update to their updates they will lose interest, specially if users gets banned quick for using them.

Another good method to stop lot simple bots would be to disable your claim button by default and trigger a mouseover event over your claim container, if mouse moves over it the button gets activated.
This wont stop good bots used by individuals but you can make it a lot harder for them.

More complex method would be to add something to your form on mouseover and auto ban/flag the account/user if that value isn't in your form, so you can often update it as soon the bots know what they have to include.

Bot's are annoying but most of them are really easy to block, probably no one will sell a good bot that is hard to spot.

First botters are already banned.
@other Faucet owners:
https://twitter.com/BTCPOPCO/status/1017920335587545088

We're currently working on more bot detection and will make a public list with all botters and their data in the future.

If you decide to use a Bot at our Faucet your account will be full banned.

EDIT:
Updated list of confirmed bot users:
https://pastebin.com/wMWHcPh1

There are more, we're working currently to auto flag them.

If your Faucet is on "1clickfilehosts.blogspot.com" then you should check also his ref links there as owner of that blog uses also a bot