Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 59 results by buffett
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
dumpwallet "filename"
Dumps all wallet keys in a human-readable format.
Dumps all wallet keys in a human-readable format.
cool! i was looking at outdated api documentation. will try dumpwallet command
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
yes i already built a load balancer for few bitcoind wallets, and of course they will be separated into fewer addresses.
and this wallet will not grow, i will leave it as it is because i don't have idea how to split the wallet.dat easily
and this wallet will not grow, i will leave it as it is because i don't have idea how to split the wallet.dat easily
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
hahaha yes it is very silly, it turns out I was using 32bit box 
no wonder bitcoind crashes when reach 4gb and ignore the rest of the memory
i already moved it to 64bit and everything seems to work fine.
thanks for the help
anyway, for anyone have similar issue but with limited RAM, using -dbcache=16 really do the trick. it works even for 100k+ addresses but every command become very slow.
no wonder bitcoind crashes when reach 4gb and ignore the rest of the memory
i already moved it to 64bit and everything seems to work fine.
thanks for the help
anyway, for anyone have similar issue but with limited RAM, using -dbcache=16 really do the trick. it works even for 100k+ addresses but every command become very slow.
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
is it possible to create a new wallet without resync?
tried to move the wallet.dat, starting bitcoind gave me
tried to move the wallet.dat, starting bitcoind gave me
Code:
Corrupted block database detected.
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
Do you want to rebuild the block database now?
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
i was trying to avoid resync the whole blockchain if possible (it already takes 1 day to reach 34xxxx).
but I will do it anyway. and see what happen. will update later.
thanks for your help.
but I will do it anyway. and see what happen. will update later.
thanks for your help.
Re: EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
the wallet has 100k of addresses
^ That is not a good idea.
The wallet doesn't scale well at all and despite the large amount of RAM you might be hitting a limit that is causing the bad alloc (although a bad alloc could also be caused through passing an invalid value for allocation).
To work out whether the problem is your wallet's size back it up and then delete it and re-start Bitcoin (it will create a new empty wallet). If no crashes happen with the empty wallet then I would assume your problem is the huge wallet.
i know it is not a good idea, but i need to get this wallet up. any ideas?
EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc std::bad_alloc bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
my wallet blockchain was crashed and I unable to start it back with -reindex
it already synced to block num 340870, and it will be crashed every 5-10 blocks:
config:
the server has 16gb of RAM and 10gb of swap.
the wallet has 100k of addresses
any help would be very appreciated.
thanks
it already synced to block num 340870, and it will be crashed every 5-10 blocks:
Quote
************************
EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc
std::bad_alloc
bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
2016-01-17 02:12:03 ProcessMessages(block, 749055 bytes) FAILED peer=6
EXCEPTION: St9bad_alloc
std::bad_alloc
bitcoin in ProcessMessages()
2016-01-17 02:12:03 ProcessMessages(block, 749055 bytes) FAILED peer=6
config:
Quote
server=1
daemon=1
rpcport=12345
rpcuser=xxx
rpcpassword=xxxx
maxconnections=8
paytxfee=0.0001
minrelaytxfee=0.0001
limitfreerelay=5
daemon=1
rpcport=12345
rpcuser=xxx
rpcpassword=xxxx
maxconnections=8
paytxfee=0.0001
minrelaytxfee=0.0001
limitfreerelay=5
the server has 16gb of RAM and 10gb of swap.
the wallet has 100k of addresses
any help would be very appreciated.
thanks
Re: [ANN][DRK] Darkcoin | First Anonymous Coin | Inventor of X11, DGW, Darksend and InstantX
darkcoin stops generating new block since 40 minutes ago, what is going on?
http://explorer.darkcoin.io/chain/Darkcoin
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/
https://bchain.info/DRK/
http://explorer.darkcoin.io/chain/Darkcoin
https://chainz.cryptoid.info/drk/
https://bchain.info/DRK/
Re: Best practice for fast transaction acceptance - how high is the risk?
I'm sorry for posting in a zombie thread. Anyone looking for a solution for accepting 0 confirmation payments may check blockcypher api: http://dev.blockcypher.com/reference.html#zero_confirmations
It's not mine but I think it's worth mention here since I was also struggling looking for a simple solution for this matter.
It's not mine but I think it's worth mention here since I was also struggling looking for a simple solution for this matter.
Re: Is it a bad idea to have a wallet with 10s of thousands of addresses?
what do you mean by active addresses and why it becomes slow?
active address i mean if the address is not empty.
bitcoind is pain in the ass in large scale
This is brand new bitcoind installed in ubuntu 14.04, bitcoind getbalance '*' 0 always return same value with bitcoind getbalance '*' or bitcoind getbalance '*' 1 or bitcoind getinfo although it has unconfirmed transactions.
Anyone have a clue?
Anyone have a clue?
Check this: https://blockchain.info/block-index/460155
The block is marked orphaned and all transactions in this block have 0 confirmation even this block was generated yesterday.
Do you have any solution for handling large wallet with bitcoind? The only solution I can think is by separating addresses into few bitcoind server. let say 10k addresses per server. But this solution is not elegant and requires a lot of work.
Thank you.
Thank you.
I have 8 core server, this server is dedicated for hosting bitcoind. So I want to utilize all CPUs for bitcoind to make it faster and more responsive. We host ~20000 addresses and bitcoind is getting slower and slower everyday. For now it takes 2-5 seconds for each transaction. From log I got 2 transactions executed for more than 60s.
Thank you.
Thank you.