I still cant understand how the fact that FortFC creators are already experienced in working on an ordinary exchange will help them to develop a product of high quality designed for the crypto market.
Regulations come nearer. In addition, the crypto exchange would do well to learn from the fund exchanges.
I hoped that we would a product designed for crypto currency which will be kinda unique.
Dozens of such projects have been created a year ago. Now you can get assured that they didnt succeed cause comfortable trading is much more important for regular users than faith in blockchain ideals.
Personally, I think that the fact that FortFC is experienced is an advantage. Thats why im going to invest in the project.
I hope that your expectations will be satisfied. I decided that Ill form my opinion about the project after the launch of a full-fledged beta version.
You might make a mistake. Coin of most of exchanges cost a dime a dozen during the development stage, but then the price skyrockets and many kick themselves. Dont want join them.
I still cant understand how the fact that FortFC creators are already experienced in working on an ordinary exchange will help them to develop a product of high quality designed for the crypto market.
Regulations come nearer. In addition, the crypto exchange would do well to learn from the fund exchanges.
I hoped that we would a product designed for crypto currency which will be kinda unique.
Dozens of such projects have been created a year ago. Now you can get assured that they didnt succeed cause comfortable trading is much more important for regular users than faith in blockchain ideals.
Personally, I think that the fact that FortFC is experienced is an advantage. Thats why im going to invest in the project.
I heard that Africa became the first country for holding lotteries due to language issue. Do you think that its rational to use such an approach?
The point is that the marketers managed to cover 85% of African population using just 15 languages.
Does it turn out that the reduction of costs is the main factor? Well, then im ready to see the true value of effectiveness of GG methods efficiency.
Cost reduction is always a good thing, but, as for me, the key factors here are marketing effectiveness and the demand for the lotteries themselves.
However, this platform is focused on mobile devices users. Do you really think that theres stable connection? Therere problems with technologies!
It seems that you dont handle the situation and captivated by stereotypes. 90% of African population has access to mobile phones. This is one of the most fast growing world markets.
In such a case, im sorry. However, id prefer the project to be launched in USA or China this would allow to cover as big audience as possible.
I heard that Africa became the first country for holding lotteries due to language issue. Do you think that its rational to use such an approach?
The point is that the marketers managed to cover 85% of African population using just 15 languages.
Does it turn out that the reduction of costs is the main factor? Well, then im ready to see the true value of effectiveness of GG methods efficiency.
Cost reduction is always a good thing, but, as for me, the key factors here are marketing effectiveness and the demand for the lotteries themselves.
However, this platform is focused on mobile devices users. Do you really think that theres stable connection? Therere problems with technologies!
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. Itd interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they dont need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. Thats what the forecast is based on.
Its clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. Therere not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right?
Why do you consider only brokers? Other organizations and therere a lot of them all over the world are corporate clients, too.
Who else can get connected to FortFC?
For example, banking organizations
Banking organizations??? Seriously? Why will they need getting connected to FortFC at all?
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. Itd interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they dont need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. Thats what the forecast is based on.
Its clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. Therere not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right?
Why do you consider only brokers? Other organizations and therere a lot of them all over the world are corporate clients, too.
I read an interesting opinion telling that the client base of FortFC will get at least 50 new active clients annually. Itd interesting to hear what basis such a forecast was made on. Why would investors believe in it at all?
The point is that FortFC services are already available for corporate clients on demo version. So they dont need to pay anything to get connected to paid services. Connection will be completely free. Thats what the forecast is based on.
Its clear, but i still doubt it. 50 major brokers will get connected each year. Therere not that many of them all over the world for such an influx of clients, right?