Search content
Sort by
Showing 5 of 5 results by calibra
I think they have to update the difficulty algorithm again.
Sometimes miner mine more than 20 blocks in an hour, for example:
504522 - 2017-11-17 10:01
504547 - 2017-11-17 10:55
Sometimes hardly one block in an hour:
504584 - 2017-11-17 15:51
504585 - 2017-11-17 16:34
504586 - 2017-11-17 17:34
The Cash Dev team is definitely professional!
Sometimes miner mine more than 20 blocks in an hour, for example:
504522 - 2017-11-17 10:01
504547 - 2017-11-17 10:55
Sometimes hardly one block in an hour:
504584 - 2017-11-17 15:51
504585 - 2017-11-17 16:34
504586 - 2017-11-17 17:34
The Cash Dev team is definitely professional!
I like it. It has the cool EDA feature of the original Bitcoin Cash. Long live Bitcoin Clashic, the original Bitcoin Cash!
http://bitcoinclashic.org/
http://bitcoinclashic.org/
Hello,
I was just looking how the bitcoin full node distribution looks like. It was kind of interesting to see, that most (90%) of the Satoshi 1.14.5 2X nodes are hosted on Amazon.com, Inc.
This does not look like a normal user pattern. What do you think?
I wonder who would trust such a network? I would think that in this setup a 50% attack could be possible.
Cheers
I was just looking how the bitcoin full node distribution looks like. It was kind of interesting to see, that most (90%) of the Satoshi 1.14.5 2X nodes are hosted on Amazon.com, Inc.
This does not look like a normal user pattern. What do you think?
I wonder who would trust such a network? I would think that in this setup a 50% attack could be possible.
Cheers
I am checking the new segwit feature, but something seems to be wrong.
If I try to send from a segwit address to a segwit address, the fees are higher than normal. I set the fees for example to 80 S/B, and the calculated value will be 111 S/B. With normal transactions this does not happen. Why?
If I try to send from a segwit address to a segwit address, the fees are higher than normal. I set the fees for example to 80 S/B, and the calculated value will be 111 S/B. With normal transactions this does not happen. Why?
Transaction fees are calculated differently for SegWit transactions. I'm not going to get into all the details, but look up "Block Weight". I presume Armory will receive a UI update in the future to properly reflect this, but there is currently a disconnection between "Satoshis/Byte" and "Satoshis/Effective Byte"
Specifically, you are specifying the actual Satoshi/Byte with your fee, but with the SegWit discount your "effective" fee is the larger value.
Thanks for the explanation. For me it was confusing, because I set it for 80 and I see actually 111, which let me think this transaction will be more expensive. It would be great, if the block weight was displayed, and it would actually say, you save x S/B this way.
I am checking the new segwit feature, but something seems to be wrong.
If I try to send from a segwit address to a segwit address, the fees are higher than normal. I set the fees for example to 80 S/B, and the calculated value will be 111 S/B. With normal transactions this does not happen. Why?
I made a screenshot.
https://i.imgur.com/xyp8UUq.png
And why cant it fetch the fees from the node?
Thanks
If I try to send from a segwit address to a segwit address, the fees are higher than normal. I set the fees for example to 80 S/B, and the calculated value will be 111 S/B. With normal transactions this does not happen. Why?
I made a screenshot.
https://i.imgur.com/xyp8UUq.png
And why cant it fetch the fees from the node?
Thanks