Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 24 results by caloydgreat
THis is how its computed:
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
ETH is cheaper than ICO phase, ETH was 0.013+ BTC during the ico, so I consider to calculate based on BTC price, aka IVO price is: 0.000015-0.0002 BTC
Hi everyone, those calculations are wrong. Somebody posted the right ones here and we thank them for that and for defending our project despite the heated tone of the post
: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1624343.new;topicseen#new
Something we can only agree with is: our coin's value is tied to the success of the game. We are full time on developing a great game that hopefully (and with work of course) will draw a big community of players, and then the Nexium can gain momentum. The beta for backers is not so far away, only February, and the open beta for the end of march/beginning of April.
If you have questions, there is our slack: http://beyond-the-void.signup.team/
The last thing I want to say is: we are not pro traders. We are a passionate team developing a video game. We do our best to ensure that everybody is happy with the ICO and with the project in general, but we have no control on what's traded on Poloniex or other exchanges, and over the price.
That's not how investments are computed. You established your base figure on the date of investment and its value on that investment date. If you compute it base on the present value, you must also factor the time value of money accumulated from the date the investment is made to present. As such, it needs at least 27% more to my original computation, thus, makes investment on nexium worst. There are always bad investment, We know that. And at the moment, given this, the investment made on nexium is really on the worse side. Very bad for the initial investor. You should protect your business, that's the cardinal rule.
Ps. That some one who made a computation you say is "right" should rethink to himself, is he fooling himself or baiting others to invest more. His thinking and arguments are flawed. You are twisting computation to justify and make it look less ugly. I say he needs to go back to highschool and study economics 101.
Listen to me wise man:
First, I dropped out from economics university career last year with 19 years old and 90% A marks. I think you can imagine why.
Second, I've been making a shit ton of money by investing/trading alts last 2 years and a half, and will keep doing so in the future. I'm starting a hedge fund next year and I'll be the lead manager, with 21 YEARS OLD
Third, you can make the computation you want, I don't fucking care about "how it's done" in your Oxford university. I care about REAL FACTS, and this is the SIMPLE REALITY from a $ perspective investor:
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
@Final
8.50/575 = 0.014782 USD/NXC (Yeah, the guy was also lying in the final days ETH value)
NOW
0.00001700 BTC* 820 BTC/$ = 0.01394 USD/NXC
So wise man, you can complicate the calculations whatever you want. Reality is that ICO was aproxximately at 0.015 USD/NXC and now it's trading between 0.13-0.15 USD/NXC . And you don't need a 120.000 $ master in Harvard to know that.
Also, if you invest here is to make a 500-1000% returns in the future when the product is ready. It doesn't make any sense to be calculating every % point like it was an S&P 500 point. Have in mind that liquidity in these markets in generally poor, and much more in these BTC growing days.
This is venture capital man, I think you're in the wrong site. Get back on your suit and keep working for your nasty multimillionaire bosses
http://i.imgur.com/dN8qoJa.gif
http://i.imgur.com/dN8qoJa.gif
You can keep your arguments with you. Theres no point in keeping a discussion valid if you keep twisting whatever invalid logic left in your twisted brain. As Simple as computation of gain you cannot comprehend, how more the complexity of other far more important matters. And no, in my eyes, as a pioneer in mining BTC, long before -ck- wrote his cgminer, whatever you will gain in this is petty.
THis is how its computed:
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
ETH is cheaper than ICO phase, ETH was 0.013+ BTC during the ico, so I consider to calculate based on BTC price, aka IVO price is: 0.000015-0.0002 BTC
Hi everyone, those calculations are wrong. Somebody posted the right ones here and we thank them for that and for defending our project despite the heated tone of the post
: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1624343.new;topicseen#new
Something we can only agree with is: our coin's value is tied to the success of the game. We are full time on developing a great game that hopefully (and with work of course) will draw a big community of players, and then the Nexium can gain momentum. The beta for backers is not so far away, only February, and the open beta for the end of march/beginning of April.
If you have questions, there is our slack: http://beyond-the-void.signup.team/
The last thing I want to say is: we are not pro traders. We are a passionate team developing a video game. We do our best to ensure that everybody is happy with the ICO and with the project in general, but we have no control on what's traded on Poloniex or other exchanges, and over the price.
That's not how investments are computed. You established your base figure on the date of investment and its value on that investment date. If you compute it base on the present value, you must also factor the time value of money accumulated from the date the investment is made to present. As such, it needs at least 27% more to my original computation, thus, makes investment on nexium worst. There are always bad investment, We know that. And at the moment, given this, the investment made on nexium is really on the worse side. Very bad for the initial investor. You should protect your business, that's the cardinal rule.
Ps. That some one who made a computation you say is "right" should rethink to himself, is he fooling himself or baiting others to invest more. His thinking and arguments are flawed. You are twisting computation to justify and make it look less ugly. I say he needs to go back to highschool and study economics 101.
THis is how its computed:
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
ETH is cheaper than ICO phase, ETH was 0.013+ BTC during the ico, so I consider to calculate based on BTC price, aka IVO price is: 0.000015-0.0002 BTC
Actual ScreenShot taken during ICO run. ETH at $10.8046 (but $10.837 at the actual start of ICO)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1630816.120
And ETH somehow climbed that time due to purchases for this ICO to $11.10. Trust me. I watched this closely.
THis is how its computed:
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
THis is how its computed:
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
BTC price during ICO : $ 630.00
ETH Price during ICO : $ 10.837
Initial 5M offer : 700 NXC/ETH
Final 5M offer : 425 NXC/ETH
@Initial
10.837/700 = 0.01548142 USD/NXC
0.01548142/630= 0.00002457 BTC/NXC
@Final
10.837/425 = 0.02549882 USD/NXC
0.02549882/630 = 0.00004047 BTC/NXC
Look at where it is now. You know what they say when Coins fell Below ICO price. I dont have to spell it out.
http://beyond-the-void.net/index.php/nexium-price/
Does your mod support solo mining on ether? Is there no downtime in your mod?
Smod work is garbage.
Guys, I have a system with 5 GPUs, 3 R9 290 and 2 RX 480, all using usb risers with sata/molex adapter. He's been standing about 3 months 24/7. Today I smelled something burnt and found what is in the picture. Just the two that energized the RX 480. Do the RX 480 continue to extract more than pci_ex can support? Is there something wrong with my PSU?
My RIG:
Asrosk H81 Pro BTC
Intel Celeron G1820
8GB RAM
3 R9 290 + 2 RX 480(all stock)
USB risers
Cougar GX 800 + Corsair CX 750
https://postimg.org/image/an2rbk0wv/
Depends on the driver. Should be fixed with the latest driver. Im using the same molex/sata connector but no burnout like that.My RIG:
Asrosk H81 Pro BTC
Intel Celeron G1820
8GB RAM
3 R9 290 + 2 RX 480(all stock)
USB risers
Cougar GX 800 + Corsair CX 750
https://postimg.org/image/an2rbk0wv/
Re: [ANN] Expanse (EXP) - Blockchain powered immutable cloud computer
I thought mining expanse is profitable for old cards but I am so wrong. Pointed all cards to zcash classic and it almost double my earnings. Getting about $4.10 per card if you use the right miner. You should all thank me for this tip.
I think it would be best to both parties and to all miners if this would just be for free. Without the dev fees.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
?!??!??!?There is no logic in what you want !!
By going to the store if you donate bread or have to buy it?
Developers also need to eat!
I understand where you are coming from but there is already animosity in the air. If the miner released by @claymore is open-sourced there would be no drama. As you know the issue is, the source of the code is open and created by another good developer, used by claymore as admitted by himself, enforced small % as dev fees without acknowledgement of the source. This is just one way to settle the infringement and there can be many others.
To answer your store question: Find money to buy food to eat, but have it the right way. There can be ways other than enforcing dev fee on this one.
One question will ask you to finish comments!
You do not know use foreign software, which is the work of someone to make money from it !!!! Why do it then? Do not use it.
Have you heard of the Copyright Law ....?!?!?
This is where I does not matter, but you think you have entirely mistaken thinking.
Huh!? I certainly did not understand your comment.
I think it would be best to both parties and to all miners if this would just be for free. Without the dev fees.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
?!??!??!?There is no logic in what you want !!
By going to the store if you donate bread or have to buy it?
Developers also need to eat!
I understand where you are coming from but there is already animosity in the air. If the miner released by @claymore is open-sourced there would be no drama. As you know the issue is, the source of the code is open and created by another good developer, used by claymore as admitted by himself, enforced small % as dev fees without acknowledgement of the source. This is just one way to settle the infringement and there can be many others.
To answer your store question: Find money to buy food to eat, but have it the right way. There can be ways other than enforcing dev fee on this one.
I think it would be best to both parties and to all miners if this would just be for free. Without the dev fees.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
Please remove the dev fees in your zcash miner @Claymore. Just let it be for the public and all of us miners will appreciate you more and I think @mrb would have no objection to that.
Please remove the dev fees. Just this once.
Thank you.
Someones trying to make a point. From 17.5 to 25 is not bad. Keep it up. Someone might jump in. Im staying away for a while. 
Good luck to you all.
Now it decline very fast at 21 k it is bad for those who bought at 36 k . it will be fine when the price move over 40 k no matter when that happen . Good luck to you all.To push it past 40 you'll need about 1700 btc on all 3 exchanges. That would mean additional 1m on marketcap.
Garbage. Words like these are garbage. It means, he thinks it has value and do not want coins holders to convert when clearly this coin is going nowhere except the drainage. Pump and dump is over. I pumped it and many others, easy money.
Well even with the profit taking we just gained about 1000% in the last 10 days. Pretty solid in my opinion. This is just the beginning for SDC, and I expect it won't be long before we see another 1000% gain. The weak hands always take early profit. In the case of SDC, they will regret not doing their homework...
As far as coin holders converting SDC to BTC, or other coins, I don't speak for anyone else around here, but I would personally rather see those with your attitude sell their coins to more deserving investors. I have recommended SDC to my family, and close friends, because I have no doubt where we are headed. I wouldn't waste my time helping the fudders.
After you have been around for a while, maybe your opinion will count for something.
https://umbra.shadowproject.io/
I think id been around long enough even before your chain existed to understand that your coin will stale for a long period from now on. This is for those who do not have large holdings who cannot afford to be stuck to this coin. If they are expecting it to go higher, I do not see any indication unless you have some news or a huge btc holder will keep it afloat. And if there is, I can put a large order or even push the price higher. Also, there is no need to label my attitude, I just explained my understanding of your statement has no meaning, and if that offended you accept my apologies. After all I did patronize your coin for a period.
Well that's the basic problem with all you losers/fudders.
You say you have been around for a while, but you have to keep changing your user name because of your poor reputation. I've seen it a thousand times.
At the very least you are stating you have no understanding of the concept that experience and stability = credibility.
The reality with kids like you is success stories (like SDC) bother you, because you are a loser. You're statements are advertising this fact.
I'm not offended in the slightest, but need to say that you can't seem to grasp the most basic logic!!!
If you really felt the way you claim, you would have no reason to be here!!!
BUSTED!So please go spread your FUD somewhere else, NO ONE here is buying it!
It seems you are the one who's fudding. No kid earn north of 200 btc from sdc. That's just earnings alone. Thanks to you and your coin. I looked again at my database, your coin will stale for a period of 4.7 mos with +/-3.7% gain/loss from now on. This is based on your 5th day of listing. I do not count the first 4 days.
Re: [ANN] LADAcoin ΛΑΔΑ (LDC) / Scrypt / PoW/PoS (Start 06/16/2016)
@LADAcoin how do you see this coin in the near future? Are there plans, companies, investors, you would get in touch with? What can Ladacoin offer unique from other coins in the market? If you have, you should fixed the grammar, spelling (specially in your github code) and composition of what you want to express for this coin. It should be in english in general I believe.
If you don't go out and offer it to investors,companies, the less this will get acknowledge and of course less valued. You and your team should reach out, put a roadmap and contact the right person.
Or is this a coin just for fun, come whoever may come. I hope its not. Good luck to you and your team.
If you don't go out and offer it to investors,companies, the less this will get acknowledge and of course less valued. You and your team should reach out, put a roadmap and contact the right person.
Or is this a coin just for fun, come whoever may come. I hope its not. Good luck to you and your team.
Re: [ANN] LADAcoin ΛΑΔΑ (LDC) / Scrypt / PoW/PoS (Start 06/16/2016)
1 block every 2-3 hours at 8khs out of the networks' 25-32khs. This is getting frustrating.
More than sufficient balance on my trial node. I have many running rigs now to be honest, and turned off some old rigs(6gpu's) to be sold, thinking of pointing the cpu to these coin(most likely running a node on each) for months but this result is very frustrating. I am not getting a good response from the dev.
More than sufficient balance on my trial node. I have many running rigs now to be honest, and turned off some old rigs(6gpu's) to be sold, thinking of pointing the cpu to these coin(most likely running a node on each) for months but this result is very frustrating. I am not getting a good response from the dev.
Re: [ANN] LADAcoin ΛΑΔΑ (LDC) / Scrypt / PoW/PoS (Start 06/16/2016)
"BitcoinMiner" in LDC is hell of a saga
I beginnng to understand what you mean. More of a mistake than a saga. lol
Re: [ANN] LADAcoin ΛΑΔΑ (LDC) / Scrypt / PoW/PoS (Start 06/16/2016)
What is this? - Warn in LadacoinMiner : Invalid zero amount on balance - unable for fast mining!
Need minimal balance for fast.
Quote
LadacoinMiner : Alowed balance: 8285.10
Or mining with long pause after every blocksI see. I will be needing that minimal amount then for fast mining. Do you share ladacoins just in case?
128UrMxtHMNAz5ZG2LHLR1Vs6FE1kvxmWJ
it's crypto pal, always check the source, it's far more interesting:
https://github.com/ladaco/ladacoin/blob/master-0.10.4.6/src/main.cpp#L1278
https://github.com/ladaco/ladacoin/blob/master-0.10.4.6/src/miner.cpp#L410
"BitcoinMiner" in LDC is hell of a saga
Thanks but i did look at that after my post. What i wanted to know is the logic from the op behind that line. Btw, I put an order on 22sat. can someone fill it up? 2 SAT higher. Thanks
Re: [ANN] LADAcoin ΛΑΔΑ (LDC) / Scrypt / PoW/PoS (Start 06/16/2016)
What is this? - Warn in LadacoinMiner : Invalid zero amount on balance - unable for fast mining!
Need minimal balance for fast.
Quote
LadacoinMiner : Alowed balance: 8285.10
Or mining with long pause after every blocksI see. I will be needing that minimal amount then for fast mining. Do you share ladacoins just in case?
128UrMxtHMNAz5ZG2LHLR1Vs6FE1kvxmWJ