Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 41 results by cameloid
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bittawm Trust Review - Goldshell BYTE - A Unique Hobbyist Home Miner
by
cameloid
on 04/08/2025, 04:35:45 UTC
if they dropped in a scrypt board option it would be a nice solo miner.

There is a scrypt board. I actually run the unit with two of them installed. The total hash rate is approximately 160 MH/s, which isn't particularly high, but it's still 14 times better than the Lucky Miner LG07, which costs only slightly less. The Byte would be a decent choice for solo LTC/DOGE mining if not for its software and hardware reliability issues.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Bittawm Trust Review - Goldshell BYTE - A Unique Hobbyist Home Miner
by
cameloid
on 23/07/2025, 15:40:55 UTC
The Goldshell Byte is a solid choice for home mining enthusiasts, but the reliability and firmware quality leave a lot to be desired.

The stock PSU died on me after just one week of hashing. To Goldshell's credit, they immediately shipped out a replacement unit without any hassle. However, both the PSU and the miner itself run extremely hot, so I'm honestly not sure how long this new PSU (and the Byte as a whole) will last, especially when running at the HIGH power setting.

Then today, my Byte randomly lost its WiFi connection and switched back to access point mode for no apparent reason. I had to manually connect to it and reconfigure the WiFi settings before it would work normally again. No other WiFi devices in my network ever experienced anything like that. This isn't exactly what you'd expect from a device that's supposed to run 24/7 without any babysitting.

The web interface sort of works, but it still feels like a beta version if you know what I mean? It gets the job done but feels unpolished (FW ver 3.1.2).

Overall, I love the concept and it's great for hobbyist solo mining, but the execution isn't quite there yet. Really hoping for some firmware updates to fix at least the software issues.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon Nano 3 [unofficial thread]
by
cameloid
on 26/05/2025, 04:04:16 UTC
for nano3s
use

Code:
8c6976e5b5410415bde908bd4dee15dfb167a9c873fc4bb8a81f6f2ab448a918

after that should work.

Hey, could you provide a bit more details on exploiting the Nano 3S? Its web UI is quite different from the Nano 3, so the timezone hack isn't applicable here.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [∞ YH] solo.ckpool.org 2% fee solo mining 299 blocks solved!
by
cameloid
on 23/05/2025, 03:30:52 UTC
It looks like eusolo.ckpool.org is down:

Code:
₿ (15980) stratum_task: Socket created, connecting to 57.129.83.51:3333
₿ (16170) stratum_task: Socket unable to connect to eusolo.ckpool.org:3333 (errno 104: Connection reset by peer)
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: New review coming up soon. It is a mystery for now. A beagle!
by
cameloid
on 13/05/2025, 11:23:24 UTC
 Good to hear it. BTC is really wonderful investment asset recently.

  BTW, we accept NotFuzzyWarm's suggestion to let users turn ON/OFF backlight at the main page. Philip, do you want to upgrade the firmware for this function? If yes, I will send the firmware and update guide to your mail box.

Hey cyc22, why don’t you make firmware updates available on your website?

As a side note, it would be great to have an option to choose between 12 and 24-hour time formats. Would it be possible to implement this (or, preferably, just publish the source code, as your firmware is clearly based on AxeOS)?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Avalon Nano 3 [unofficial thread]
by
cameloid
on 01/05/2025, 02:40:19 UTC
They patched up some security holes in the latest firmware 24071801_42c628d. So that exploit from earlier doesn't work anymore, bummer!
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Official Thread] Beagle miner as cute as Snoopy
by
cameloid
on 21/04/2025, 10:30:38 UTC
I recently received this compact Bitcoin mining device and can confirm it delivers a smooth and stable performance at approximately 100 GH/s. Note that it ships without a power supply unit, so you'll need to purchase a high-quality PSU (15W+) separately, as the device is quite sensitive to good power source. While it incorporates a fan, operation is practically silent.

The unit does have a somewhat beta version feel - the settings interface lacks many timezone/location options, the display fonts appear rough, there's no option for 24-hour time format or alternative date formats, and the screen surface scratches easily. Despite these shortcomings, the overall experience is satisfactory, and customer support has been very responsive, promising a firmware update soon.

Value-wise, the hashrate-to-price ratio ovisously isn't competitive (the Bitaxe Gamma offers 10x the performance at the same price). The unit's specifications (100 GH/s @ 8.5W @ 425 MHz) suggest older technology similar to the BM1387 chip from the Antminer S9 era, though the manufacturer claims it uses their proprietary new ASIC manufactured by TSMC. Regardless of its modest performance, it's an interesting and unique gadget that makes for a nice addition to my home collection.

It's encouraging to see new competition in this space, and I look forward to future offerings from this emerging company.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: [Official Thread] Beagle miner as cute as Snoopy
by
cameloid
on 07/04/2025, 06:37:10 UTC
Cute device indeed! Can you ship to Singapore by any chance? I tried to make an order, but the website said "Unfortunately we do not ship to SG. Please enter an alternative shipping address."
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: Lucky Miner LV07 - Firmware wanted
by
cameloid
on 01/01/2025, 07:08:28 UTC
Great work, unpainted, much appreciated.

Are you planning to synchronize your codebase with skot/ESP-Miner:master?
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Deutsch)
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Lucky Miner LV07 - Firmware gesucht
by
cameloid
on 31/12/2024, 08:25:11 UTC
⭐ Merited by unpainted (1)
Flashed my LV07 (proprietary firmware 1.0.0) with unpainted's firmware today. No issues so far. Great work!
Post
Topic
Board Computer hardware
Re: [PRE-ORDER] FutureBit Apollo LTC Official Order Thread
by
cameloid
on 04/09/2018, 14:10:01 UTC
I have a couple of Moonlanders, but one of them was bought from Eyeboot, and another one directly from you on Ebay. How can a get a coupon?
Post
Topic
Board Digital goods
Re: Start mining with USB miner. it should be your first rig
by
cameloid
on 26/04/2018, 17:47:03 UTC
chip? price? how to order?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: GekkoScience Terminus R808 Miner Official Support Thread
by
cameloid
on 15/04/2018, 13:15:56 UTC
Got some minor problem with Terminus. After a couple months of normal work, it now only gives me a steady while light (instead of base blue and blinking white with returned share). At the same time, the device itself hashes just fine at a pretty normal rate. A faulty LED?
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Who likes pod miners?
by
cameloid
on 11/03/2018, 14:00:12 UTC
Just got my Terminus, works just fine so far. Just wanted to say thanks for an excellent product and a great collectible to sidehack! Can't wait for your Bitfury developments.
Post
Topic
Board Hardware
Re: Who likes pod miners?
by
cameloid
on 28/02/2018, 10:48:23 UTC
No response at all, or no response about placing an order? Because if there's no response at all, she probably didn't get your message.

I got response, placed the order, paid it in full via PayPal (4 days ago). No communication from Laura since then.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Official FutureBit Moonlander 2 Driver and Support Thread
by
cameloid
on 12/01/2018, 09:21:50 UTC
I have had similar issues, and the 2.6Mh/s sounds all too familiar (several ppl reported similar effects throughout this thread). What clockfrequency are you using? Did you twiddle with the potmeters? Also, when it starts up, that is right after bfgminer starts up, is the MLD behaving normal, do you get the expected hashrate before the first restart? Make sure to check, and that it only drops down to 2.6 after it starts restarting.

When connected directly on the PC, go back to at least 600Mhz or (even) less, until the problem completely disappears. Then scale up from there and see where it starts.

For me it is definitively seems power supply issue, and I seem to have it under control now on my external hub, but I have been struggling with the same error messages and one MLD stopping and restarting all the time too. There is a debugoutput option on bfgminer and the futurebit-driver has a lot of debugoutput (see corresponding .c file in the source code), but it didn't get me much wiser other than understanding how this thing really works under the hood, which is fascinating in itself...



I'm using default frequency (600 MHz), and I never touched anything on the board. Also tried 500 Mhz setting just now, same difference.

It reads about 3.6 MH/s initially, but restarts begin almost immediately, so it's really hard to tell what the accurate hash rate is.

I'm 99.99% sure that this is not a power issue. Tried to connect the stick directly to different machines, tried two powered hubs, tried Lenovo dock station with 40W power supply and USB 3.0 ports - no changes. And, as I said, it all began just a few days ago - before that I had no issues at all in exactly the same configuration.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Official FutureBit Moonlander 2 Driver and Support Thread
by
cameloid
on 12/01/2018, 03:33:43 UTC
I was running the stick for a while without any problem, but recently all of a sudden the bfgminer log started to look like this:

 [2018-01-10 19:41:27] Accepted 005114ba MLD 0  Diff 12m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:33] Accepted 002be7f3 MLD 0  Diff 22m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:48] MLD 0: ASIC has stopped hashing, attempting to restart
 [2018-01-10 19:41:49] Accepted 0038776b MLD 0  Diff 17m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:50] New best share: 73m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:51] Accepted 000d96a3 MLD 0  Diff 73m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:51] New best share: 115m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:52] Accepted 0008abcc MLD 0  Diff 115m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:56] Accepted 002f34f2 MLD 0  Diff 21m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:57] Accepted 006701af MLD 0  Diff 9m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:16] Accepted 0045588e MLD 0  Diff 14m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:17] Accepted 00256d79 ZUS 0aq Diff 26m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:17] MLD 0: Unrecognized response
 [2018-01-10 19:42:19] Accepted 00798f2c ZUS 0bs Diff 8m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:29] MLD 0: ASIC has stopped hashing, attempting to restart
 [2018-01-10 19:42:32] New block: ...a64ee3d1e95b8290 diff 3.66M (26.21T)
 [2018-01-10 19:42:32] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2018-01-10 19:42:42] Accepted 00592a2d MLD 0  Diff 11m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:43] Accepted 00180ccc ZUS 0bk Diff 41m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:47] Accepted 006127ac MLD 0  Diff 10m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:53] Accepted 005c4df2 MLD 0  Diff 10m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:55] MLD 0: Unrecognized response

etc

So it still hashes, but with frequent errors and at degraded hash rate.

All settings are default, I never overclocked the miner. No configuration changes (which I know about) were made. Powered USB hub.

What could it be?

Looks like something weird is going on there, you got shares coming from a Zeus board? Did you custom compile the driver and try and run both at the same time? That is most likely the issue as Zeus commands could be messing up the Moonlander.

Yes, I run Zeus board as well on the same machine (never had any issues with this setup before). I'm using bfgminer-5.4.2-futurebit2-beta2 from this thread built from the source code, and the host OS is Linux.

However, I'm pretty sure that the problem is not related to this bfgminer build, possible interference with Zeus and/or hub power issues, as I just tried to run this Moonlander 2 under Windows on a completely separate machine (using "official" bfgminer binary from you) without any USB hub involved, and got exactly the same result. The stick hashes at about 2.6 Mh/s, but the driver spits out "Unrecognized respose" every few seconds.

Seems that the device itself is faulty (even though it used to work just fine for about a month before this issue came out). Should I send it to you for further investigation/warranty exchange, or you want some more debug info?
Post
Topic
Board Exchanges
Re: CRXzone - The Next Singapore Cryptocurrency Exchange
by
cameloid
on 11/01/2018, 03:45:39 UTC
I would NOT recommend this exchange to anyone, please see my review: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2641122.0
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Official FutureBit Moonlander 2 Driver and Support Thread
by
cameloid
on 10/01/2018, 19:48:33 UTC
I was running the stick for a while without any problem, but recently all of a sudden the bfgminer log started to look like this:

 [2018-01-10 19:41:27] Accepted 005114ba MLD 0  Diff 12m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:33] Accepted 002be7f3 MLD 0  Diff 22m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:48] MLD 0: ASIC has stopped hashing, attempting to restart
 [2018-01-10 19:41:49] Accepted 0038776b MLD 0  Diff 17m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:50] New best share: 73m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:51] Accepted 000d96a3 MLD 0  Diff 73m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:51] New best share: 115m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:52] Accepted 0008abcc MLD 0  Diff 115m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:56] Accepted 002f34f2 MLD 0  Diff 21m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:41:57] Accepted 006701af MLD 0  Diff 9m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:16] Accepted 0045588e MLD 0  Diff 14m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:17] Accepted 00256d79 ZUS 0aq Diff 26m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:17] MLD 0: Unrecognized response
 [2018-01-10 19:42:19] Accepted 00798f2c ZUS 0bs Diff 8m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:29] MLD 0: ASIC has stopped hashing, attempting to restart
 [2018-01-10 19:42:32] New block: ...a64ee3d1e95b8290 diff 3.66M (26.21T)
 [2018-01-10 19:42:32] Stratum from pool 0 detected new block
 [2018-01-10 19:42:42] Accepted 00592a2d MLD 0  Diff 11m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:43] Accepted 00180ccc ZUS 0bk Diff 41m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:47] Accepted 006127ac MLD 0  Diff 10m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:53] Accepted 005c4df2 MLD 0  Diff 10m/7m
 [2018-01-10 19:42:55] MLD 0: Unrecognized response

etc

So it still hashes, but with frequent errors and at degraded hash rate.

All settings are default, I never overclocked the miner. No configuration changes (which I know about) were made. Powered USB hub.

What could it be?
Post
Topic
Board Other languages/locations
Re: Singapore
by
cameloid
on 24/12/2017, 14:54:40 UTC
Hi all,

I would like to share my experience of using CRXZone with you.

I was looking for reliable bitcoin/altcoin trading service in Singapore, and as the choice was not rich, I quickly came across CRXZone. I tested it on a couple of relatively small transactions, everything was more or less fine, so I decided to give it a chance with bigger funds. The operation was quite simple: deposit SGD, exchange SGD to BTC, withdraw BTC to some external wallet. Unfortunately, this experience wasn't that good. Below are my thoughts about it.

1. Waiting times.

It took 2 hours from the moment I made FAST (Fast And Secure Transfers) transfer from my DBS account to exchange's UOB account before the money showed up. Phone support wasn't helpful at all, and the only thing that they offered was to wait because of "so many transfers today". Given that FAST transfer normally takes seconds, this is an inadequately long waiting time.

Really, from user standpoint, an option to make FAST transactions instead of slow wire transfers makes the most sense of using local Singaporean exchanges for Singapore-based customers. But it seems that CRXZone does not benefit from this at all. By the way, it takes their competitor, FYB-SG, just minutes to credit user account in similar situation.

Another, even more stranger issue, is crypto withdrawal waiting time. Apparently, some (all?) crypto transactions require MANUAL approval from staff as well, so I had to wait around 40 minutes (!) before my BTC withdrawal operation was actually executed (i.e. broadcasted over Bitcoin network).

In that way, the most simple and typical scenario (deposit money, exchange, transfer) took more than 3 hours to complete, which is way too much when you need to pay somebody in crypto real quick.

2. Transaction fee.

The most painful issue. When my transaction was finally broadcasted, I quickly noticed that transaction fee set by the robot (staff?) was way too small for the given period of time/network load (200.738 sat/B). No surprise that transaction didn't go through, and I was able to get it confirmed only after 6 days of waiting, and only because I was lucky enough get it "accelerated" by one of the miners.

I lost a lot because of high exchange rate volatility within that period of time, and I also lost a contract for which I initially was transferring the funds.

I was a little shocked with all this, because transaction fee estimation is not a rocket science, and if they're unable to manage it themselves, there are plenty of services with public API around. I never experienced anything like this with any of exchanges that I ever used in last 4 years.

3. User support.

Of course, I tried to address this issue to their user support (as there are different ways to deal with this situation, like re-sending the transaction with higher fee, accelerating transaction via miners, etc). However, I didn't get any productive output except for a great advice to stop using the service if I was not pleased by the way the company runs it (literally). They never said sorry, nor admitted their liability or offered any help. I also tried to contact their management directly - got no reply.

Bottom line is - CRXzone is a baby exchange with fails the most simple, basic operations, shifts all responsibility to a customer, and provides zero user support. AVOID it!