And I don‘t call you not trustworthy because of your code but because of the way you behave and the fact that you mention specs here which are not implemented

But ad hominem fallacy perfectly describes what you did when I mentioned the halving cycle of 4200000 blocks that you had previously. Instead admitting it you referred to the mistake I did before and called me brain dead and id*ot.

You mean people who don‘t blindly trust you and try to understand your blockchain? I admit I made one mistake reading your code but that‘s not a reason to make fun of me and call me brain dead and id*ot. Especially after the other critics were true. It just shows that I was right with my suspicion. You behaviour is clearly a sign that you are not trustworthy.

No thanks, I  think this discussion showed me enough of your blockchain and your team

So if it was 4200000 blocks then why are you insulting me when I question you half baked blockchain?These are clearly open points and you can‘t get personal every time someone is asking questions

Yes maybe I read it wrong but please don‘t insult me. I just try to learn. This was the reward function from before:

Maybe you can explain me the mechanics behind it

I am well aware that other  blockchains  can also change their reward functions.
The point is that you promote your blockchain here with completely different tokenomics than you have implemented. You didn‘t implemented a max supply and your halving cycle was 4200000 blocks if i am correct. With a block time of 120 seconds it would take 15 years to reach the first halving and 42 million coins would have been mined.
And with your new half baked reward function you will also still get more than 21 million coins.

Ah ok I admit I haven‘ t thought about it. But the way you behave and the fact that you haven‘t implemented the basic tokenomics is just a red flag. Again please don‘t get emotional I just try to do my DYOR.

You see that‘s why I found your code highly suspicious. What else haven‘t you yet implemented?
And why is your premine 10 trillion:

No I mean where in you code is it defined. I couldn‘t find it

I am sorry if I wrongly accused you but your github just looks suspicious to me and you can‘t be careful enough these days. Could you maybe guide me to where you specify the max supply and the halving cycle. And please don‘t get to emotional, it wasn‘t my intention to attack you personally.

It seems to be a fork from pokiachain which has completely different tokenomics than you describe. But I couldnt find your tokenomics anywhere in your code wich is actually a red flag. Also your github account was created just 5 days ago.

Ah I see  your genesis allocation is 20 million of 30 million max supply

You started on 5th July and already emitted 67%?

Where is the source code? The repository is empty

I mean the source code! Nothing is published yet

Why is your repository empty?

Repository is empty and github account was created just one day ago. Be careful binaries could contain malware!

Potential malware since the repository is empty and the github user was just created

Repository is also empty and github account has just been created. So the binaries are probably malware