That pretty much sums it up that OP is desperately trying to get me tagged for something that was done years ago.
Tell him to post any recent suspicious activity and I bet he won't find any. All he wants is to get me tagged which is why he is keeping on bumping this thread every now and then.

Cheater detector, stop wasting everyone's time and bringing up old posts which was already reported.

If the basis for rule-following is just obeying the forum rules, then the default state of the forum would be nothing more than a bunch of polite scammers that refuse to copy each other's scam techniques.

I would probably say that the act of using your own clandestine alt isn't the most trustworthy way to do things, especially if you could simply manage the campaign and advertise it in your signature at the same time. The incentive of being paid according to one's post quality in a limited campaign makes it easy for a manager to judge their posts in a biased manner - where one might be less inclined to spam in other campaigns, someone who both runs and participates in a campaign could effectively reward themselves for spam to maximize their time. This is especially important if they had multiple accounts and had to create a constant slew of posts.

I can't help but wonder why the OP would gather up multiple posts by user morvillz7z post them in one new thread and stress out that nothing is being done to those who've been identified as alts?

Why not contact the Campaign Managers directly and send them links?  Have you tried this?  What was their response?

Why these two?  Why now?

I say that if there's another link between the set of users crptotrader, nikjain, Sahyadri and the pawanjain/hasmukh_rawal group then you can conclude decisively that they are, in fact, connected.

Shenanigans have appeared enough in the past for me to hesitate on fully committing to the A->B link from crptotrader007 taking on the reputation of hasmukh_rawal - this is a very thin thread to follow and if you are willing to compromise rigor and affirm the consequent instead of creating a tautological A<->B link with multiple posts connecting the two, then you are free to do so. However, operating under such a system opens up the opportunity for malicious agents to fabricate links.

I know how that sounds but I was only managing the signature campaign at that time. All the rules and guidelines were from the owner of Yutu.co.in
There was no such rule that Signature campaign cannot have alt accounts and besides that I had already conveyed to the campaign owner that I will be promoting the campaign myself with whatever way possible.

I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:


This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.

I don't know why is everyone pretending not to see, how many facts you want to ignore to save this person!

Dear @hulla, I think your memory is not very keen and you shouldn't have to trust your memory next time.
Actually, you are caught by your own words.
Neither it was a newly generated wallet nor you used it mistakenly later. In fact, you have been using it for a long time before.

Used by @hulla on April 12, 2019
Used by @hulla on April 19, 2019

Used by @posi on January 25, 2020

[moderator's note: consecutive posts merged]

maybe it's because those cases that you reported on this thread are cases from the past. do you have any recent complaints? because all I saw are things that happened in the past years and I don't see why someone would be leaving negative feedback because of something that happened 1 year or more years ago. My point is that people can change and we have to make judgments based on the present and not the past when we leave negative feedback and about why the manager accepts him to participate in the signature campaign I think the answer is quite simple:

each manager can accept anyone he wants, even if that person had a hundred alt accounts, a hundred negative feedbaks, the manager can still accept him.

The rules for each signature campaign were created by the managers, this means that they can change or simply ignore the rule and accept whoever they want

How will you ?
You were not there when I was going through the situation.
The story is true whether you believe it or not. But over the years I have learnt a lot thanks to bitcointalk. You can also see through my progress and my contributions towards the forum. Rest is upto you guys.

The mistake I did was not to read the campaign rules clearly.

Wow, feeling sorry for someone who has abused signature campaigns with multiple high-ranked accounts. Really? I wonder where does all this empathy come from? 

BTC connection:



ETH connection:



And most importantly joining the same campaign with your alt account:

Signature Campaign

General Rules:

Payouts will be distributed weekly.
The first week of the campaign will start on Thursday, 03 May 2018.
We reserve the right to increase or decrease the proportion of coins allocated to this campaign.
All participants are required to join our Telegram channel here: Telegram Channel
We reserve the right to eliminate you if we think you haven't been honest with your work or spamming.
We reserve the right to change our signature campaign rules.
Participants with negative trust on bitcointalk.org forum are not allowed to participate in this campaign.
Enrolling with multiple accounts is not permitted.

Nobody is perfect bud. I have made mistakes in my past but what matters is how you learn from the mistakes and improve yourself. I had faced time when I had no job and my financial status was so low that I had to walk miles to save a few bucks.Signature campaigns helped me a lot in handling my expenses and I thank the forum for that with all my heart. It was during those times when I committed this mistake. The mistake I did was not to read the campaign rules clearly. Although I did apply for it at the same time, once I read the rules clearly, I decided not to go against the rules and I left the campaign not only with one but both of my accounts. You can also see this in the spreadsheet (post count is same) of that campaign.
Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1FKIXSX7mdYykkF29Ls0_vP1y54IraFvExAyNvWciJ2w/edit#gid=0

While the forum rule is that alt accounts are accepted and few of the trusted members here have alt accounts too, I have tried not to spam/shitpost/or any activity which is against the forum rules. I respect the forum for whatever it is. After that incident I have tried not to commit such mistakes again. Do you still think I have done anything wrong or something that is against the forum, if yes please let me know before anybody flags my account. Flagging an account doesn't take much time but building it while complying the rules does take a lot of hardwork and time.

P.S: I have tried to contribute much towards the forum and the crypto community in general. Besides that I have also encouraged people to use crypto and provided them crypto knowledge whatever I had.
When I had no job, I have also educated other people to learn about crypto and this was one of the ways I started earning money through crypto.

The crypto market will usually increase in value with Bitcoin, and before investing, you should analyze this coin to know exactly what is happening. I think this month or next month the whole market will have a huge correction and that will be an opportunity for you to buy some potential coins in this market. However, that is just my prediction and depends on your investment strategy.

In my opinion if there could be a way to lessen or remove all the scam bounty campaign so bounty hunter could promote legit and promising project, So investor and bounty hunter would not be fooled by the any scam project. I don't blame Bounty hunter spamming and advertising any project there are just a victim of scam bounty campaign  which they believe that the project they are promoting will be successful in the future.

Hello my all Traders Friend,  anyone can tell me the Best Trading coin of Binance Exchange? You can comment Daily or Long time base trading coin of Binance exchange.