same here.

I also experienced this randomly with 14.1.0 too.
CUDA 10, 417.71
9 x1070 Ti, 80GB swap file
tried with +0 core +0 mem, didn't help
psu is oversized (I use it around 50%)

Can't mine with bminer I always get this message:

W10, nv 416.34, 12x1070 Ti

edit:
ok, it seems I had too little (80gb) virtual mem. with 85 works fine.

Hi,

I have a problem with a 12 gpu rig.
OS: W10 64bit, driver 398.11, ram 8 GB, virtual 80 GB.
The first 8 cards initialization is very fast, but then slows down. 9., so-so, but the rest seems stuck.

output: http://pastebin.xyz/p?q=UzYyOE8

I did not experience this problem with earlier versions (I mean with ewbf for 200,9). Maybe it was not very fast (the initialization), but it was not that bad.

On some algo (e.g. PHI1612), enemy initialize my cards very slowly ( 10+GPU rigs on W10, 390+ ), I mean minutes.
I have experienced this "issue" with ccminer too, but a "--cuda-schedule 12" command solve my problem without high CPU usage (if I use any other number as 12 my CPU usages go to the moon and the system becomes unmanageable).
In enemy, I tried all options:

--cuda-schedule     set CUDA scheduling option:
  0: BlockingSync (default)
  1: Spin
  2: Yield

but unfortunatelly did not help (max CPU usage, except with 0).

Can you add the "old / original" --cuda-schedule options?

I want to see Darth Vader on the other wall too.  

According to Bittrex

There is a problem with the concept for long term.
There will be no gap for long -> soon, we will not need a bridge.
In places, where is no electric chargers -> there will be very few electric cars -> small market
Anyway, how long does it take to fill a car using household power?

btw nice story bro.

And what happen with this calculation if the net hashrate is low but the difficulty is very high?
The case is: when the difficulty is low miners hop and increasing drastically. At this point (increased, high diff) the same (lovelyNH)miners leave the coin.
This can be experienced with lot of coins. These are waves.
This happened with SIBcoin yesterday:
- SIB difficulty drop to low, 300-400
- NH miners ON
- Difficulty jumped to ~8600
- NH miners OFF
and after loyal miners mined this block (~8640 diff) for 3-4 hours because the net hashrate was very low but the difficulty stucked at very high.

Therefore I think, in general, it is better if you do the calculations using the difficulty, not the nethash.
It works with most coins:

Coins_A_Day = 86400 / (Difficulty * 2^32 / YourHashPerSecond) * BlockReward

Highlighted HashPerSecond, it's your hashrate in H/s, not KH/s or MH/s or GH/s.

As you know, but:
1 KH/s = 1000 H/s
1 MH/s = 1000000 H/s
1 GH/s = 1000000000 H/s

Try it and check the result on WTM.

There are some exception, example KMD:
Coins_A_Day = 86400 / (Difficulty * 2^4 / YourHashPerSecond) * BlockReward

I think around 3-7k sat.
Maybe start higher but in this case will be dumped by fast hands (-> &diff drop).
We'll see.

Thanks for your tip & help reducing intensity helped a lot, my power peaks are gone!
But one of my rig now instant restart (since intensity was reduce to 19), I don't know why, with other algos there are no problems.
(tried with 0 core -500 mem and 50 TDP also)

Need a little update on the first page & pools.

POOLS

https://yiimp.eu - available, global hashrate 80+% here (with highest, 2% fee, smart)
https://mineblocks.co.uk - bad link, available but only with simple http, not https
https://pool.0301.farm - available
https://rapidpools.com - available
https://dpool.io - available but CREA pool doesnt work
https://altmining.org - bad link, available but only with simple http, not https
https://pool.nosekefik.com - available but no CREA pool here.
https://sekop.terrano.id - not available

Google, first result?

https://github.com/KlausT/ccminer/releases

Also 1080 Ti and 1070 Ti rigs here. I think it's not a power supply problem.
E.g.: With 8 1080 Ti the power consumption with max TDP is ~300W * 8 = 2.4 kW.
I'm using 2.4 kW server PSU's (little oversized at "normal" usage) what I tested with 2.8 kW (peak) power and there was no problem.
+ with GRLC, the peaks don't come on every card at the same time. For me the allium algo is a silent killer.
Silent because low power consumption and killer because of the extreme high peaks.

Blockreward 37->15 
There were 25 in the past ..

The low power consumption is great.
But the mining generate very high peaks in power% here (not infrequently 125%, with official ccminer and nVidia cards).
My rigs just shutdown/reset quite often even if I set low core clock and use curve for setting it (and I not set it higher than the factory settings over 900mV).
Also tried with lower mem clock but nothing, my rigs often shutdown.
I using lots of algo and there is no problem with them, but now I'm clueless and don't know how to mine GRLC safely, but efficiently.

Any idea?

Explorer?

. solved, my bad

Bitfinex is public, I think.

1) the main goal is to avoid the inconvenience in the future
2) they started sooner

I'm a "SnowGemmer", but they must be right.
There is no problem with this, let's rebrand