Search content
Sort by
Showing 15 of 15 results by coelto
Re: Crypti | XCR | Ͼ | 3 PoS algorithms | Ed25519 | 2nd Gen Source
Look at http://live.crypti.me/. There are no new bloks since height 33950 2014/09/24 13:53:41. And in whitepaper block time is 1 min, but in average it is 2-3 min by this time. Bug? And online wallet http://wallet.crypti.me/ does not work.
Re: [ANN] Crypti | XCR | Launch August | 100% POS | New Source | Trading has begun!
Some technical question. If i have 1 computer with crypti client, but 2 internet accesses with 2 different IPs. So, will i have 2 nodes and forge twice better?
Re: [ANN] [ICB] IcebergCoin ❄︎ FIRST NIST5 POW/POS ❄︎ NOW 100% POS ❄︎
Why one address has ~1.2M ICB (0.27%)? http://icb.coinzone.info/RichList
It seems to be unfair distribution...
It seems to be unfair distribution...
this is the ico adress on bittrex
Ok. Why the ammount of coins on this address does not change since block #5319? I mean there is one received and zero sent. Nobody (who invest while ICO) withdraw ICB from Bittrex?
Re: [ANN] [ICB] IcebergCoin ❄︎ FIRST NIST5 POW/POS ❄︎ NOW 100% POS ❄︎
Why one address has ~1.2M ICB (0.27%)? http://icb.coinzone.info/RichList
It seems to be unfair distribution...
It seems to be unfair distribution...
Re: [ANN] [ICB] IcebergCoin | FIRST NIST5 POW/POS █ █ LAST CHANCE FOR MINING █ █
How many bloks is POS coin maturity?
And POW ends on 15 098 block. So due to some of POS solved blocks 5,101-15,098 total amount of coins will be less than 6.250.000. I'm right here?
And POW ends on 15 098 block. So due to some of POS solved blocks 5,101-15,098 total amount of coins will be less than 6.250.000. I'm right here?
Can someone please help me?
I'm trying to compile the bot but I keep getting this error:
Edit 1: I now have reason to believe the problem is in my Makefile. Checking it out now...
Edit 2: I still have no idea what to do.
I'm trying to compile the bot but I keep getting this error:
Code:
/usr/include/c++/4.7/bits/c++0x_warning.h:32:2: error: #error This file requires compiler and library support for the ISO C++ 2011 standard. This support is currently experimental, and must be enabled with the -std=c++11 or -std=gnu++11 compiler options.
init.cpp: In function void* upd(void*):
init.cpp:472:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
make: *** [obj/init.o] Error 1
I tried adding "-std=c++11" to the "make -f makefile.unix USE_UPNP=-" command but it isn't a valid thing.init.cpp: In function void* upd(void*):
init.cpp:472:1: warning: no return statement in function returning non-void [-Wreturn-type]
make: *** [obj/init.o] Error 1
Edit 1: I now have reason to believe the problem is in my Makefile. Checking it out now...
Edit 2: I still have no idea what to do.
1) Find in /src/makefile.unix line 106:
# CXXFLAGS can be specified on the make command line, so we use xCXXFLAGS that only
# adds some defaults in front. Unfortunately, CXXFLAGS=... $(CXXFLAGS) does not work.
xCXXFLAGS=-O2 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \
$(DEBUGFLAGS) $(DEFS) $(HARDENING) $(CXXFLAGS)
2) Add -std=c++11 so:
xCXXFLAGS=-O2 -std=c++11 -pthread -Wall -Wextra -Wformat -Wformat-security -Wno-unused-parameter \
$(DEBUGFLAGS) $(DEFS) $(HARDENING) $(CXXFLAGS)
3) make -f makefile.unix
If devs sold all of their coins how can you explain this http://moto-explorer.fvds.ru/address.php?address=MoLnCJGJXBGLkPjFfJ9sRXVv7nEvwwEuZck. There is one transaction from address, which received 150k in #0 block http://moto-explorer.fvds.ru/transaction.php?transaction=a05b6e6a99468edf9f4b3833b63857e686e2d55de3239cd3e05a783a2defacb8. Only one transaction for this address, and it is 150k. It seems transaction to yourself. There is something unclear here...
Anybody mining now? (without bots, manually)? Price seems to be healing bit by bit, atleast its in old digits now. Glad I bought some when it crashed but if only I had decent volumes there would be some serious profit right now.
Yes, and it is not so hard right now (25 sec levels). Some my of friends mining to, but they mine just for fun. But 3-4 June it was very-very hard.
Re: [ANN][MOTO] Motocoin | Proof-of-Play | First exclusively human-minable coin
Main reason why this was botted is because of these fall-thru maps. Bots probably just find these maps and then play them looking several seconds into the future and choose actions that will move them closer to the coin. I believe, it is much harder to complete usual map with bot because sometimes you need to actually move in opposite dirrection from the coin.
What can we do to prevent bots?
1. Change level generation algorithm to prevent fall-thru maps. This is the main countermeasure against bots.
2. Increase map size.
3. Use some sort of Scrypt/X11 in map generation to prevent fast map enumeration.
This will definitely take some time to implement.
What can we do to prevent bots?
1. Change level generation algorithm to prevent fall-thru maps. This is the main countermeasure against bots.
2. Increase map size.
3. Use some sort of Scrypt/X11 in map generation to prevent fast map enumeration.
This will definitely take some time to implement.
Will it be a restart of the coin or just fix?