Search content
Sort by
Showing 18 of 18 results by coinhuddle
The last time I posted to this community, I sold a large set including the Kialara gold 'coins' (see post history).
I have no idea what to ask for this. It is a low number, #31.
Accepting serious offers and price advice. Motivated to sell.
Pictures: https://imgur.com/a/5n3oIu3
Thank you.
I have no idea what to ask for this. It is a low number, #31.
Accepting serious offers and price advice. Motivated to sell.
Pictures: https://imgur.com/a/5n3oIu3
Thank you.
Re: [WTS] Kialara coins - large set including original, the gold edition, more
Current high offer is 5.2 BTC for everything.
I personally (emotionally) lean towards selling the entire lot, but holding back one of the golds. But just communicating the current high offer for now.
I personally (emotionally) lean towards selling the entire lot, but holding back one of the golds. But just communicating the current high offer for now.
Posting to this thread to let those interested know I have #18 and#19 gold for sale, among others.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1701847.0
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1701847.0
Re: [WTS] Kialara coins - large set including original, the gold edition, more
I'd be willing to provide escrow if so desired. Good luck with your sale!
Thank you! I will be in touch if a sale happens
[WTS] Kialara coins - large set including original, the gold edition, more
Hey everyone,
I'm accepting offers (as posts here or private message) on the following Kialara coins. I would prefer to sell them all together, but I understand that the gold ones and the originals from 2014 may be the most valuable and people may want to only purchase those.
Images:
https://i.imgur.com/tjSaRw8.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Ki7aUJT.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/iw862YG.jpg
From left to right, top to bottom:
I am not active on this forum, so I will need an education on how to credibly handle transactions (escrow and what not). Happy to share additional information about myself with buyer if an offer is accepted (social channels, business info, etc.).
I'm accepting offers (as posts here or private message) on the following Kialara coins. I would prefer to sell them all together, but I understand that the gold ones and the originals from 2014 may be the most valuable and people may want to only purchase those.
Images:
https://i.imgur.com/tjSaRw8.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/Ki7aUJT.jpg
https://i.imgur.com/iw862YG.jpg
From left to right, top to bottom:
- Excavatorelevator 1 (limited edition 500 appears to be in stock) http://kialara.com/product/kialara-original-gold-2015-2/
- Excavatorelevator 3 (limited edition 100 and sold out) http://kialara.com/product/signature-series-ricky-allman-excavatorelevator-3/
- Excavatorelevator 2 (limited edition 250 appears to be in stock) http://kialara.com/product/signature-series-ricky-allman-excavatorelevator-2/
- Julia Tourianski Current (appears to be in stock) http://kialara.com/product/signature-series-ricky-allman-excavatorelevator-2/
- 2015 Labyrinth #32 (limited edition 2500, first 700 have silver spheres) http://kialara.com/product/kialara-signature-series-julia-tourianski-current-2015-2/
- 2x 2014 Original .1 BTC #14 and #87 (limited edition 2500) http://kialara.com/product/kialara-signature-series-ricky-allman-excavatorelevator-1-2015-2/
- 2x 2015 Original 1BTC w/Gold #18 and #19 (limited edition 100) http://kialara.com/product/kialara-original-gold-2015/
I am not active on this forum, so I will need an education on how to credibly handle transactions (escrow and what not). Happy to share additional information about myself with buyer if an offer is accepted (social channels, business info, etc.).
Re: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - NEW IPO, NEW HARDWARE, 1,500 TH/S HASH RATE
I understand being unable to stomach a 1-2 year commitment to a mining company. This is a fair perspective to have, and you should sell.
But the selling happening is on the level of people reacting like Cryptx/PETA is Neo&Bee.
But the selling happening is on the level of people reacting like Cryptx/PETA is Neo&Bee.
Re: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - NEW IPO, NEW HARDWARE, 1,500 TH/S HASH RATE
When I think of the history of mining companies, and just general bitcoin companies on Havelock and other investment platforms... IMO, PETA still rises to the top. There is no disagreement from me that some of the questioning going on here is warranted. I personally find it encouraging how much larger the CryptX group of companies is. I would like to see full transparency on the relationship between the companies to help solidify my investment and potentially invest more. I'm not against a group of companies double or triple dipping (PETA paying sister companies for power and chips), but I just want to better understand the process when it involves a publicly traded one (PETA). There's both positive and negative spin here.. so transparency displayed on peta-mine.co or cryptx.com will help clarify the facts and remove any spin. Overall, the infrastructure that the CryptX group of companies operates is extremely positive as long as we can eliminate the FUD and spin.
I find it exciting learning about how much infrastructure is in place and how much control Cryptx has over their own future.
I find it exciting learning about how much infrastructure is in place and how much control Cryptx has over their own future.
Re: [HAVELOCK] PETAMINE - NEW IPO, NEW HARDWARE, 1,500 TH/S HASH RATE
mikemikemike,
Couldn't one argue that this business is about the deals done behind the scenes? Success is dependent around bulk orders and creating relationships between your mining business and suppliers. This large upcoming purchase reflects that, and is evidence of PETA continuing down that positive direction. 1000 btc is roughly $450,000 and that is buying 1000 TH (1 million GH). 1 million GH for $450,000 is $2.22 per GH.
My primary concern is the lack of transparency around how reinvestment btc is being saved and spent. That needs to be stepped up (maybe it is transparent and I've just missed it).
How much of the reinvestment fund so far is contributing to this large expansion?
One of the easiest tasks imaginable is creating a Google Doc spreadsheet showing weekly revenue, expenses, reinvestment, and dividends. This was started in the "Update" tab at Havelock for part of April. But hasn't been shown the past few weeks.
Why was this discontinued?
Couldn't one argue that this business is about the deals done behind the scenes? Success is dependent around bulk orders and creating relationships between your mining business and suppliers. This large upcoming purchase reflects that, and is evidence of PETA continuing down that positive direction. 1000 btc is roughly $450,000 and that is buying 1000 TH (1 million GH). 1 million GH for $450,000 is $2.22 per GH.
My primary concern is the lack of transparency around how reinvestment btc is being saved and spent. That needs to be stepped up (maybe it is transparent and I've just missed it).
How much of the reinvestment fund so far is contributing to this large expansion?
One of the easiest tasks imaginable is creating a Google Doc spreadsheet showing weekly revenue, expenses, reinvestment, and dividends. This was started in the "Update" tab at Havelock for part of April. But hasn't been shown the past few weeks.
Why was this discontinued?
Re: [HAVELOCK] SCRYPT 10 GH/s hosted scrypt mining project by CRYPTX - IPO 7 MAY
I don't think I understand this 100% yet(maybe a lot less), but don't the current dividends represent 2 IPO batches of hash power paying out to almost 3 IPO batches of shares? Won't the yield be significantly greater after Tuesday when the remaining hashing power arrives. Considering the current price, doesn't that make the potential next week dividend extremely high considering they are already at +70% yearly return(ignoring Havelocks calculations)? The price seems to have gone down since dividend announcement so I think I missed something.
we are at 74% return at current share price of 0.04049999it shouldn't be significantly greater but i guess around 1/3, but they aren't even gonna get the machines up until tuesday minimum
This is roughly in line with where PETA has been.. 70% yield.
I'm happy with Scrypt so far. If Tuesday happen, share price will go up.
https://www.havelockinvestments.com/fund.php?symbol=SCRYPT
It would be nice if havelock could update the yield calculation to be accurate. I don't want current investors to get scared away from a clerical error.
Re: [HAVELOCK] CasinoBitco.in CBTC Official Thread- BIT777/PEERBET ACQUISITION
I'm really torn on this company. It appears the voice of the company is committed to transparent communications with investors. This is really great. The more detail the better. I've personally really enjoyed blackjack and the new video poker games. I'm +.2 btc over the past two months.
My concern with this company is entirely around user experience and the overlap this has with SEO. I also think a proper investment ($10-$25k) into a well done design and front-end development would have been a better investment than purchasing the Peer/bit777 casino properties. The following statement is entirely speculation, but I'm concerned that the desire to grow fast may have resulted in purchasing sinking ships. I don't know this for certain, and I apologize if I'm way off. I hope I am wrong, and that bit777/peerdice/etc. provide great immediate profits. If they require re-working to become profitable, it may have been a poor purchase given their lack of credibility in Google.
The slight upgraded design that was applied to casinobitco.in a month or two ago was in fact a downgrade. While the design philosophy of having all of your content above the fold is dated, the practice of prioritizing content above the fold still remains. The shift in thinking (a few years established now) it that users will scroll vertically, and scrolling should be encouraged. It can be further encouraged by applying 'big design' principles to help instantly communicate to the user that they will be scrolling. In fact, it has been made clear by Google that their robots pay attention to your content above the fold, and some of their recent tools (e.g. pagespeed) are starting to objectively measure user experience factors; starting with mobile first.
Taking just the home page into consideration, which is the most important page to compete in Google for "bitcoin casino", the design is very bad. The large image/tout area pushes the most important content down without any important context. I understand design styles like this were popular a few years ago, but it is standard now to provide context with large images. At a minimum, the games should be over-layed on top of the large roulette wheel image.
I generally approve of your and tag decisions.<br><br>I'm also generally concerned with the new purchased properties not ranking anywhere in Google for the top generic terms associated with the business (e.g. "bitcoin dice", "bitcoin casino").<br><br>These thoughts are all over the place, but I think it's important to call out the design decisions. They are absolutely critical to this business, especially in the 2014 world of SEO.<br><br>tl;dr - The user experience and design decisions feel lazy and this is a huge concern given the convergence of UX and SEO.
My concern with this company is entirely around user experience and the overlap this has with SEO. I also think a proper investment ($10-$25k) into a well done design and front-end development would have been a better investment than purchasing the Peer/bit777 casino properties. The following statement is entirely speculation, but I'm concerned that the desire to grow fast may have resulted in purchasing sinking ships. I don't know this for certain, and I apologize if I'm way off. I hope I am wrong, and that bit777/peerdice/etc. provide great immediate profits. If they require re-working to become profitable, it may have been a poor purchase given their lack of credibility in Google.
The slight upgraded design that was applied to casinobitco.in a month or two ago was in fact a downgrade. While the design philosophy of having all of your content above the fold is dated, the practice of prioritizing content above the fold still remains. The shift in thinking (a few years established now) it that users will scroll vertically, and scrolling should be encouraged. It can be further encouraged by applying 'big design' principles to help instantly communicate to the user that they will be scrolling. In fact, it has been made clear by Google that their robots pay attention to your content above the fold, and some of their recent tools (e.g. pagespeed) are starting to objectively measure user experience factors; starting with mobile first.
Taking just the home page into consideration, which is the most important page to compete in Google for "bitcoin casino", the design is very bad. The large image/tout area pushes the most important content down without any important context. I understand design styles like this were popular a few years ago, but it is standard now to provide context with large images. At a minimum, the games should be over-layed on top of the large roulette wheel image.
I generally approve of your and
Re: [Minershare.net] KnC Neptune Miner #1 batch shares, $4/GHs, No hidden fees
What concerns me about these opportunities is the combining hundreds or thousands of people investing throwaway money, which ends with the potential scammer making tons of money. Each individual didn't lose much and can write it off as a high risk experiment, but that's what makes the scam so great. I'm not accusing you of a scammer, but I wish these mining businesses had minimum commitments of $2-$5k from each investor with the mining business having complete transparency.
I have no problem buying 1 or 2 of the $120 shares, but I'd much rather throw you a few bitcoins for 20-30% of a single miner.
I have no problem buying 1 or 2 of the $120 shares, but I'd much rather throw you a few bitcoins for 20-30% of a single miner.
Re: Neo EasyCoin Official - Buy BTC With Cash [UK,USA,Russia,Denmark,Sweden,Norway]
Hello! Long time lurker and new member of the forum. Finally registered due to serious interest in easyco.in and the ZipZap partnership.
Regarding easyco.in specifically, how likely is the December 31st/Jan 1st launch?
As someone involved with Internet business development and strategy, launch dates on holidays, EOD Fridays, over the weekends, beginning of a new year, etc. rarely work out as intended.
What are the web development, design and user experience plans for easyco.in?
I don't intend to be rude, but the Neo sites are not designed very well from either an artistic or user-friendly perspective. Given the stakes and the audience being targeted, easyco.in should reflect a more serious investment in design and UX. Then, in the future, maybe your other products can follow suit.
How soon can an official press release be posted about the partnership with ZipZap?
A Dec 31/January launch date has been posted in multiple locations, including the official updates seen through your Havelock profile. However, I have not seen any official updates from Neo's web portals or ZipZap's website/blog regarding easyco.in's partnership with ZipZap. How soon can we expect to see this?
Thank you for any additional information you can provide.
EDIT:
I want to add that it may be smart to move to a different domain ccTLD/gTLD. Given the recent raids in India, they may decide to confiscate or terminate bitcoin businesses on .in. I understand the .in usage is purely for the clever domain branding, but I don't think it's worth the risk given India's current reaction.
All the best.
Regarding easyco.in specifically, how likely is the December 31st/Jan 1st launch?
As someone involved with Internet business development and strategy, launch dates on holidays, EOD Fridays, over the weekends, beginning of a new year, etc. rarely work out as intended.
What are the web development, design and user experience plans for easyco.in?
I don't intend to be rude, but the Neo sites are not designed very well from either an artistic or user-friendly perspective. Given the stakes and the audience being targeted, easyco.in should reflect a more serious investment in design and UX. Then, in the future, maybe your other products can follow suit.
How soon can an official press release be posted about the partnership with ZipZap?
A Dec 31/January launch date has been posted in multiple locations, including the official updates seen through your Havelock profile. However, I have not seen any official updates from Neo's web portals or ZipZap's website/blog regarding easyco.in's partnership with ZipZap. How soon can we expect to see this?
Thank you for any additional information you can provide.
EDIT:
I want to add that it may be smart to move to a different domain ccTLD/gTLD. Given the recent raids in India, they may decide to confiscate or terminate bitcoin businesses on .in. I understand the .in usage is purely for the clever domain branding, but I don't think it's worth the risk given India's current reaction.
All the best.
Welcome Coinhuddle, absolutely thrilled to see your interest.
1) Save some operational hiccup we haven't spotted yet we expect to be online in at least beta mode by Dec 31st. Our Dev team has been working very hard to multiple deadlines including easyco.in with more than one of the team working xmas day to keep us on track.
2) Sorry to hear you haven't been pleased with the current Neo sites, presumably you mean the shareholders website? We have used a Web designer in the development of easycoin but the UI has been in house. Based on its user demographic a lot more time has been invested in the layout and user experience, hopefully this will show. Based on any feedback we receive we are open to change but I'm confident we have made a great site in easyco.in
3)We are working closely with ZipZap to push this out in the form of an official press release when it suits us both best. So far we ourselves have officially announced it to shareholders via the Neo and Bee thread and to the rest of the Bitcoin community in a thread in service announcements as well as reddit. We will be holding off any mass marketing until we have had a chance to fully test easycoin during the beta period. Although we don't expect any bugs or snags, we are well aware how important the project is and we want it to run like clockwork before we attempt to bring thousands of customers into the equation.
4) Your raise a very good point here. I don't expect that we would be of any interest since we don't run any operations there but the hardline stance of the Indian government certainly doesn't bode well. We are discussing this internally on how best to proceed.
Tom
What an excellent and quick response. Thank you! I will respond in the future with more constructive critiques of design and UX once there's something to comment on!
There are a lot of established bitcoin businesses and startups using the .in ccTLD (see: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/INRegistry, appointed by the government of India).
.in provides a clever way to end your domain brand with "co.in". However, given the latest developments in India, it may be wise to rebrand or, at the very least, have a clear transition strategy in place in case your .in domains are confiscated.
Being forced to change your domain name isn't the end of the world, but it could result in extremely negative press.
.in provides a clever way to end your domain brand with "co.in". However, given the latest developments in India, it may be wise to rebrand or, at the very least, have a clear transition strategy in place in case your .in domains are confiscated.
Being forced to change your domain name isn't the end of the world, but it could result in extremely negative press.
Re: Neo EasyCoin Official - Buy BTC With Cash [UK,USA,Russia,Denmark,Sweden,Norway]
Hello! Long time lurker and new member of the forum. Finally registered due to serious interest in easyco.in and the ZipZap partnership.
Regarding easyco.in specifically, how likely is the December 31st/Jan 1st launch?
As someone involved with Internet business development and strategy, launch dates on holidays, EOD Fridays, over the weekends, beginning of a new year, etc. rarely work out as intended.
What are the web development, design and user experience plans for easyco.in?
I don't intend to be rude, but the Neo sites are not designed very well from either an artistic or user-friendly perspective. Given the stakes and the audience being targeted, easyco.in should reflect a more serious investment in design and UX. Then, in the future, maybe your other products can follow suit.
How soon can an official press release be posted about the partnership with ZipZap?
A Dec 31/January launch date has been posted in multiple locations, including the official updates seen through your Havelock profile. However, I have not seen any official updates from Neo's web portals or ZipZap's website/blog regarding easyco.in's partnership with ZipZap. How soon can we expect to see this?
Thank you for any additional information you can provide.
EDIT:
I want to add that it may be smart to move to a different domain ccTLD/gTLD. Given the recent raids in India, they may decide to confiscate or terminate bitcoin businesses on .in. I understand the .in usage is purely for the clever domain branding, but I don't think it's worth the risk given India's current reaction.
All the best.
Regarding easyco.in specifically, how likely is the December 31st/Jan 1st launch?
As someone involved with Internet business development and strategy, launch dates on holidays, EOD Fridays, over the weekends, beginning of a new year, etc. rarely work out as intended.
What are the web development, design and user experience plans for easyco.in?
I don't intend to be rude, but the Neo sites are not designed very well from either an artistic or user-friendly perspective. Given the stakes and the audience being targeted, easyco.in should reflect a more serious investment in design and UX. Then, in the future, maybe your other products can follow suit.
How soon can an official press release be posted about the partnership with ZipZap?
A Dec 31/January launch date has been posted in multiple locations, including the official updates seen through your Havelock profile. However, I have not seen any official updates from Neo's web portals or ZipZap's website/blog regarding easyco.in's partnership with ZipZap. How soon can we expect to see this?
Thank you for any additional information you can provide.
EDIT:
I want to add that it may be smart to move to a different domain ccTLD/gTLD. Given the recent raids in India, they may decide to confiscate or terminate bitcoin businesses on .in. I understand the .in usage is purely for the clever domain branding, but I don't think it's worth the risk given India's current reaction.
All the best.
Long time lurker, finally deciding to register. It has been a couple of weeks since this thread was updated (https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=364485.0), and so I'm registering to inquire about it. Maybe now I'll start to be active here. A multi-country cash deposit for bitcoins is a huge deal. I can't imagine they'll make their Jan 1 launch date, but my curiosity is definitely spiking after 16 days of silence on that thread.