Search content
Sort by
Showing 13 of 13 results by coinzzzman
Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.8.2 - native algo switching
thinking of bios modification to my ref vegas 56. Can someone please (that has done it) tells me a good stable config and the pros/cons of all this? does it worth it? already stable 56's with 1880h/s each
You cannot mod the BIOS of a Vega 56, you can only modify PowerPlay tables for Vega. Alternatively, you can use Win10 and the latest beta version of OverdriveNTool 0.2.8beta1. Also, you can swap the Vega 56 BIOS with the Vega 64 BIOS. But you cannot mod a Vega BIOS.
HEllo thanks for your reply, yes i meant swapping bios..do you know any drawbacks like high temperatures etc or all just the same, my problems is that im living in a country with high ambient temps so i cant bear to set the fans any higher already i have a vega fan headache.already using overdrive (older version) to config vegas everything seted up via vega mining guide and powertable
IMO, temps are a big problem for vegas. If you don't maintain the HBM2 temps BELOW 70 C, you will lose hashrate. I didn't not notice a huge increase in temps when swapping 56 BIOS with 64. Greater range for clocks and memory frequency increases temps proportionally. Before messing with swapping BIOS, I'd solve your temp problem first. In other words, why increase the clocks and frequency capability when it is simply going to throttle back?
Totally agree; I've found success with keeping core volts below 950, memory to 800, fans set to 3200 min with a 4900 max, and set target temperature to 66 (you can even try lower if you don't mind the loud noise of the fans).
I've also had cases where the cards run much hotter for no apparent reason and my only guess its a radeon software or driver issue whereby it's ignoring my minimum core volts, driving more volts through the card and making them hotter. A reboot and disable/enable in device manager for each card has fixed this, and then they run 10c cooler until it mysteriously happens again.
I'm on a mixed rig of nvidia and amd, and often wonder if that's not causing me some weird issues.
Cheers
Re: GMiner v1.36 Equihash(BEAM, BTG)/CuckooCycle(AE, SWAP, GRIN29, GRIN31)
When 1.37?
1.37 Beta: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerBetaRelease/releases/tag/1.37(seems amd kernels works only on rx580/570 and vega gpus, we will fix it in release build)
Is there a way to use a fail over pool directly from the command line, without using a config file? Can we simply use:
--server server1 --user whatever -p whatever --server server2 --user whatever -p whatever --server server3 --user whatever -p whatever
I'd use a config file, but there's no way to pass in %computername% for each worker name.
thanks
I'll answer myself, yes you can
Intuitive and simple gminer, thanks!
Re: GMiner v1.36 Equihash(BEAM, BTG)/CuckooCycle(AE, SWAP, GRIN29, GRIN31)
When 1.37?
1.37 Beta: https://github.com/develsoftware/GMinerBetaRelease/releases/tag/1.37(seems amd kernels works only on rx580/570 and vega gpus, we will fix it in release build)
Is there a way to use a fail over pool directly from the command line, without using a config file? Can we simply use:
--server server1 --user whatever -p whatever --server server2 --user whatever -p whatever --server server3 --user whatever -p whatever
I'd use a config file, but there's no way to pass in %computername% for each worker name.
thanks
Re: SRBMiner Cryptonight AMD GPU Miner V1.8.2 - native algo switching
new version is great
6xvega64 GPU@1447/memory@1100 (-+1300w)
drivers 18.5.1
hashrate ~12,4KH/s (2.5% rejected shares on nanopool)
looks rock solid after 12 hours of running (last version run hardly 4 hours)
great work doc!!!
6xvega64 GPU@1447/memory@1100 (-+1300w)
drivers 18.5.1
hashrate ~12,4KH/s (2.5% rejected shares on nanopool)
looks rock solid after 12 hours of running (last version run hardly 4 hours)
great work doc!!!
What MV you using for your core? I'm assuming memory is at 800mv to get 1100
Been solid for me too. Just one restart in 24 hours and the miner handled it gracefully itself.
Cheers mate
Re: GMiner v1.36 Equihash(BEAM, BTG)/CuckooCycle(AE, SWAP, GRIN29 on AMD, GRIN31)
Actually I'll let it run for a few hours before making a negative comment
Update: Hashrate is good
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 14.2.0
Grin31 with 1080ti version 14.2.0 give me errors
Insufficient memory 9171,7 MB available on device (#0). unable to run the solver
Miner died!
Insufficient memory 9171,7 MB available on device (#0). unable to run the solver
Miner died!
Me too.. same error
same for me; I tried reducing memory usage by desktop without success. I also checked available RAM for the GPU and it was well over 10.5GB
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 12.1.0
MWgrinpool the best pool, 0 rejected shares in one day !!!
Tomorrow i ask payout to hotbit
Tomorrow i ask payout to hotbit
It must not be reporting them then because 0 rejects is virtually impossible.
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 13.0.0
Reject share rate on new version is like 15% or more when mining Grin on sparkpool :<. Please check and fix it. Bug with fetching device status (error code 999) as well.
bminer only works well with f2pool - but f2pool only allows you to withdraw to the lowest price exchanges. Those same exchanges don't allow you to withdrawal Grin. Scammy? Yes.
Re: [ANN]Bminer: a fast Equihash/Ethash/CuckooCycle miner for AMD/NVIDIA GPUs 13.0.0
When mine grin with AMD?
You can mine using AMD cards (8MB versions) using GGM_Mainnet_Win64_2_8b_stable
Re: [ANN] Ravencoin [RVN] PoW GPU Mining | Asset Transfer Blockchain (Updated ANN)
Time to put the 3i pool fiasco to bed.
After getting paid some I am also writing off around 250 coins. The pool has nothing to do with the coin itself, it's still the same project as before. RVN consistently remains one of the best coins to mine currently even after bit of a price sell off. It is still one of the most promising projects with an incredible community and astounding growth given the complete lack of promotion.
Once the pool fell over I still mined another 18 hours before I made the jump to another one. Let it go now, next time a pool looks like it's falling over GTFO and join somewhere else.
After getting paid some I am also writing off around 250 coins. The pool has nothing to do with the coin itself, it's still the same project as before. RVN consistently remains one of the best coins to mine currently even after bit of a price sell off. It is still one of the most promising projects with an incredible community and astounding growth given the complete lack of promotion.
Once the pool fell over I still mined another 18 hours before I made the jump to another one. Let it go now, next time a pool looks like it's falling over GTFO and join somewhere else.
Like you and many others, I received some coins finally but it was approximately 700 less coins than what the ThreeEyed mining website stated as my immature balance. I gambled staying with the pool even though I knew payouts had stopped and possible trouble was looming.
I gambled and lost around 700 raven; for all the others like me, live and learn and like ltlfish said, just got to let it go and learn from the experience.
Re: I do not understand about the payment of Bitcoin Gold (BTG) system.
I'm having the same issue with this pool so I'm considering leaving asap.
The calculator shows I should be getting 0.05 per day, and after three days I have 0.075 between all balances (confirmed and unconfirmed).
The pool fee says 0% but my math puts it at 50%
The calculator shows I should be getting 0.05 per day, and after three days I have 0.075 between all balances (confirmed and unconfirmed).
The pool fee says 0% but my math puts it at 50%