Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 29 results by complang
I always get paid. But it takes a little time. Don't worry.
I like the concept of this, but it needs some improvements. I'm running swichercoin and having a failover-pool so I don't miss any hashrate
I like the concept of this, but it needs some improvements. I'm running swichercoin and having a failover-pool so I don't miss any hashrate
(5s):530.0G (avg):494.4Gh/s | A:108719 R:99 HW:130 WU:6792.2/m
This is performance=) (2 module saturn)
is that 494gh/s for a oct. saturn.This is performance=) (2 module saturn)
I'd say LTC is here to stay as well as the first scrypt currency. If BTC stays LTC will stay.
I still think you should go with 1*120Gh/s SHA and 1200kh/s scrypt!
I still think you should go with 1*120Gh/s SHA and 1200kh/s scrypt!
750 is more than enough! I'd say you would be fine with 500-600W if you let the CPU "idle" (aka. not mining).
I'm running a Dual CPU Quad core (mining FTC = total 7 active cores), 1x5870 (mining LTC) and 1x6450 (also mining LTC). This under a 600W PSU without any problems.
I'm running a Dual CPU Quad core (mining FTC = total 7 active cores), 1x5870 (mining LTC) and 1x6450 (also mining LTC). This under a 600W PSU without any problems.
600 for 120Gh/s is a good price! (Almost no risk imo).
I'd personally go for 2x7950 and that 120Gh/s. You can always buy another card when you got money in a month or two
I'd personally go for 2x7950 and that 120Gh/s. You can always buy another card when you got money in a month or two
I wonder how high it will be able to go. I mean, did KnC underclock those chips or did they take a VERY safe value of clock?
A 100% overclock should not be possible imo
I'm running 295 atm, hashrate bumping between ~380-400 avg 389.
Starting to get a little bit scared for my 700W PSU when Bert reports 375W (thats way lower than actual power usage at wall).
A 100% overclock should not be possible imo
I'm running 295 atm, hashrate bumping between ~380-400 avg 389.
Starting to get a little bit scared for my 700W PSU when Bert reports 375W (thats way lower than actual power usage at wall).
Seems to work pretty well with 265 on nov saturn cgminer 3.9.0. Total output according to bertmod = 351W (+20W from OEM). 25-28A current/VRM.
Hashrate varying between 350-370 but it's for sure a speed increse
So far the temps seems to stabilize around 46c with 0,15% HW. Amazing!
What does the "spi-test" do really? Running it at 50000 right now.
Edit/update: Avg hashing rate stabilizes at 360Gh/s. + 20 000 shares on BTC Guild (+~12-15%)
Stats:
STATUS=S
When=1390166000
Code=11
Msg=Summary
Description=cgminer 3.9.0|SUMMARY
Elapsed=179569
MHS av=360975.24
MHS 5s=361370.11
Found Blocks=0
Getworks=6576
Accepted=60400
Rejected=407
Hardware Errors=28968
Utility=20.18
Discarded=12597
Stale=0
Get Failures=0
Local Work=15590432
Remote Failures=1
Network Blocks=362
Total MH=64820127467.5121
Work Utility=5042.77
Difficulty Accepted=15155066.00000000
Difficulty Rejected=62756.00000000
Difficulty Stale=0.00000000
Best Share=8287478
Device Hardware%=0.1916
Device Rejected%=0.4158
Pool Rejected%=0.4124
Pool Stale%=0.0000|
Hashrate varying between 350-370 but it's for sure a speed increse
So far the temps seems to stabilize around 46c with 0,15% HW. Amazing!
What does the "spi-test" do really? Running it at 50000 right now.
Edit/update: Avg hashing rate stabilizes at 360Gh/s. + 20 000 shares on BTC Guild (+~12-15%)
Stats:
STATUS=S
When=1390166000
Code=11
Msg=Summary
Description=cgminer 3.9.0|SUMMARY
Elapsed=179569
MHS av=360975.24
MHS 5s=361370.11
Found Blocks=0
Getworks=6576
Accepted=60400
Rejected=407
Hardware Errors=28968
Utility=20.18
Discarded=12597
Stale=0
Get Failures=0
Local Work=15590432
Remote Failures=1
Network Blocks=362
Total MH=64820127467.5121
Work Utility=5042.77
Difficulty Accepted=15155066.00000000
Difficulty Rejected=62756.00000000
Difficulty Stale=0.00000000
Best Share=8287478
Device Hardware%=0.1916
Device Rejected%=0.4158
Pool Rejected%=0.4124
Pool Stale%=0.0000|
Re: Bitcoin Miners that will be added to the network Discussion
Great idea!
But we have to remind that knc's neptune will perform better than the advertised hashrate.
I ordered my saturn as a 200Gh/s miner, and it performs 330-340 at the pool.
But we have to remind that knc's neptune will perform better than the advertised hashrate.
I ordered my saturn as a 200Gh/s miner, and it performs 330-340 at the pool.
Thxs to this thread and alittle help on IRC...I turned up my jup. to around 630-650gh/s on poolside thxs tolip great job and my HW errors down to .5%
Not enough information..That doesn't help anyone. What do your config look like? 4/8VRM? Etc. thxs tolip great job and my HW errors down to .5%Why not share information?
Changed the clock to 231 (plenty of how-to above).
Performance is steady 650-670 on pool, have 3 x8-vrm boards and 1x 4-vrm (RMA-d). Temps 43 (intake side boards) to 55 degrees, I lowered the fans for more flow over the boards.
Power usage (bertmod) from 451 W to 644 W (speed from 562 to 678 In cgminer), hw 3.5% (tightened the voltages a bit which increased hw-errot but reduced power/avoid it gets to hot.
Asic chips can handle more if I base it on the heat coming of them but don't know any higher clock frequencies as 231 ( besides that the vrm's are around their 40W limit already). Guess more juice can be pumped out if 8 vrms can be activated again!
I wish there was a firmware with that to the nov as well.
So, has anyone tried this on nov. unit except from me? Those negative results (340+ -> 333Gh/s at best) is making me sad