Only made money on HVC, even while mining and IPO at about 170% investment rate (3400 vs 5900). Some made even more.

Good coin by idea, bad coin by maintenance but I'm not complaining  

173 btc over 5 milion hvc: 0.00003460

I was at 8, W at 64. Windows with 13.12 drivers did get me the 27.something MH/s Thanks for the xintensity advice.

I'm getting around 24.8 from a 290@1125 and 4.3 from a 7750@950
Mem clocks are default. I can't seem to get anywhere near the 28MH reported. Running with 13.12 drivers and 14.3b ocl libs.

@mintpal you can get it back to ~4800 with < 0.05 btc at the moment. Just ppl trying to push it down by creating an artificial dump (which isn't there)

I get around 22000 from a 290 @ 1100MHz and a 7750 @ 3.9 MH/s @ 950MHz

Quite easy to check: Nr of blocks found vs hashrate vs global hashrate. No 'marginal' differences, then no problem. if you do 1/3 of the pool it is noticable if you cheat ...

You are correct, what I meant was the gaps between the blocks found. But to make the comparison 'fair' the strength of the pool has to be normalized over time so you don't get peaks due to rise/fall of the pools total hashrate. Anyway, your conclusion is what I wanted to show so no harm done.

That is exactly the same miner ... the reorder's version of cgmiiner 3.7.3 compiled from source.

Nice graph, but the probability distribution of finding a block with normalized hashrate (e.g. taking changes in pool size into account) is a poisson distribution (or gamma for that matter) with a low lambda and not gaussian over 1 (if it were, the long gaps would correctly be odd). Your graph simply shows the lower end of the distribution with some outlyers (don't know if this is the English word) like the >700% blocks. Nothing weird here, sample size is simply too low to draw conclusions based on the available data about the tail of the distribution.

A decent mathematician can probably calculate the arrival time of blocks to a certain degree of accuracy but its complicated and takes some effort or detailed knowledge of the systems involved. Check out waiting times, Erlang and those kind of things concerning arrival estimation if you want to know more about it.

 

Southern and northern island gpus work. So 79xx and up and most 77xx and 75xx and the R series. R series should be a lot better though due to some enabled operations in the post 1200 build of the ocl compiler for those gpus.

Apparently you are not smart enough to consider the effect of gpu's on ANY algorithm while willing to spend >100K on it. As stated, not smart ...
 

Preferably bad ones: More for us.

Running stable @ 8.8MH/s now on 290. (also doing cpu mining at around 180KH/s just to keep my room warm :p)

Highly likely as the 'anti-parallelism' stuff in the hefty part is far from sufficient. Too little branching and not enough random memory access (which gpu's are very bad at), let alone plain memory usage. All other methods are not sufficient to stop parallelism as the bottleneck is memory access time/bandwidth.

All the other algorithms can (except for Groestl) be easilly put in a opencl/cuda file and run. Some tweaking and we might see some miners in the next weeks (as there are at least two running now).

Despite all the images with weird ppl:

Will the source be available for the modified cpuminer at launch? Makes compiling on linux a lot easier

I would STRONGLY recommend of changing this as -v is the default on unix/linux systems for verbose. --vote looks fine.

See point 3:

IPO details van still be found here:
http://heavycoinforum.com/index.php/topic,2.0.html

With the keygen tool you got a privatekey, a public key and an address. So yes, you can check it.

Can someone explain to me why lots of people around have the following issues:
- no understanding of economics (heavy ipo demand does not dilute the value, it actually confirms the value and raises it. Look at market ipo launches and share value, the difference being the release schedule and trade volume available). Heavy mining at start might drop the value, true, but that is not what a IPO is for. It is (generally) used to strengthen trust in a product, in this case that is definitely needed. If you invest heavy though, you can manipulate the market enough to get an advantage.
- The only problem with the previous statement is the lack of a public trading platform (e.g. exchange). This is needed shortly after start to avoid massive dumps at the start of trade.
- IPO is meant to strengthen a value of a share (in this case coin), not to get in cheap. You will definitely lose a little bit at the start. Depending on trade volumt  you can create more volume and thus have a strong position in the market.
- Use the font and bold options to state something that is either obvious while not in bold or has a high BS value attached to it.

Don't mind reading btc offers, do mind reading crap...



Now to get constructive:

Does any of the devs have a minerd (cpuminer) or other cpu miner source available at launch (I'm definitely going to do some optimizations and finding a lot)?
This is to ease stratum/management support.

Running out of ip's to use to do that ...