Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 113 results by coolfish
Anyone know an exchange which will add Qora soon?
sharexcoin
ETA?
Re: [ANN+IPO]Next ColoredCoin-Next generation asset exchange system Based on Nxt
[NXT] Nxt - Official Thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=587007.0
https://nxtforum.org
nxt.org
nxt.org news:
the domain name nxt.org have been auctioned with 1,3537 USD recently on Sedo platform .
http://news.domain.cn/html/yumingzixun/2014/0207/31292.html
bougt by Nxt community?
the domain name nxt.org have been auctioned with 1,3537 USD recently on Sedo platform .
http://news.domain.cn/html/yumingzixun/2014/0207/31292.html
bougt by Nxt community?
Great job.
with 0.7.0e
any suggestion?
TKS.
Code:
[2014-02-07 12:57:56.176] DEBUG: Database cache size set to 126720 kB
[2014-02-07 12:57:58.927] Database is at level 6
[2014-02-07 12:57:58.928] Updated database is at level 6
[2014-02-07 12:57:59.077] Scanning blockchain...
stick the above for a moment ,then the cmd window disappear.[2014-02-07 12:57:58.927] Database is at level 6
[2014-02-07 12:57:58.928] Updated database is at level 6
[2014-02-07 12:57:59.077] Scanning blockchain...
any suggestion?
TKS.
me too...!
Whether to publish a simple client first? Then gradually add features
we have two clients!
trie minusbalancer or marcus03, I did they are awesome!
Pin
I like to double click to start the client
Hm... eMunie announced OB1 on 1 February
Quote
Following is a list of components not enabled for OB1:
Distributed P2P exchange (OB2 scheduled)
Distributed market place (OB2 scheduled)
Final economic model
API calls for the above
Remote admin panel for clients
Distributed P2P exchange (OB2 scheduled)
Distributed market place (OB2 scheduled)
Final economic model
API calls for the above
Remote admin panel for clients
much wow - so they finally designed the economic model? - as an economist I am really anxious to see it. fixing exchange rates is serious hard business if not impossible. the rest lets see in ob2
on 1 February?
Client released earlier than NXT?
NXT is not the first 2nd generation?
All =1000000000 nxt; //10b
Ab =account balance;
Case two: Similar 1 account = 1 vote , No matter how much the amount, fixed amount of voting.
In this case, the account count is limited, because each must have nxt amount over 1000.
Maximum number of accounts is 1,000,000,000/1000 =1,000,000 vote
Ab =account balance;
Case two: Similar 1 account = 1 vote , No matter how much the amount, fixed amount of voting.
Quote
if Ab<1000; {1 account = 0 vote; fee=1 nxt} //acct less than 1000, no the vote right.
if Ab>1000 and Ab<=10000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
if Ab>10000 and Ab<=100000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
....
.....
if Ab>100000000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
if Ab>1000 and Ab<=10000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
if Ab>10000 and Ab<=100000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
....
.....
if Ab>100000000; {1 account = 1 vote; fee=1 nxt}
In this case, the account count is limited, because each must have nxt amount over 1000.
Maximum number of accounts is 1,000,000,000/1000 =1,000,000 vote
The best poll!
I think each voting member required to have a minimum 1000 Nxt is a fair idea. You have to make at least a little investment to have a say so. People can't be given more votes simply because they have more NXT. But a limit - like 1000 NXT or 5000 NXT would lessen manipulation.
why do you want to keep the price low? I'm not saying you are wrong or anything to want that. Just curious.
Lower price makes big stakeholders to sell more.
sorry to be a pain but could you elaborate on your thought process here.
@CFB:
Maybe we should set up a fund, contact the original stakeholders, buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders at price 0.0001 BTC, and then use the fund defines each person can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC. (No matter market prices change)
And The sold part of NXT not to intervene in the market, the market should be allowed to return to freedom. Because this is buyer property, you cannot be too much intervention.
E.g:
Creat a Funds (buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders)
Nxt market prices :0.0002 BTC
New Nxt user (e.g: Each bitcointalk user) can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC from Funds.
If this Nxt user wanted to buy more, he will join the market exchange price 0.0002 BTC.
So the new user can afford the price. and does not interfere with other early investors.
Now Your team intervention in the market, ineffective and too blind.
U should try.
I don't know the initial stakeholder willing to do?
Distribution of original, It is not scientific. really bad...
why do you want to keep the price low? I'm not saying you are wrong or anything to want that. Just curious.
Lower price makes big stakeholders to sell more.
sorry to be a pain but could you elaborate on your thought process here.
@CFB:
Maybe should set up a fund, contact the original stakeholders, buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders at price 0.0001 BTC, and then use the fund defines each person can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC. (No matter market prices change)
And The sold part of NXT not to intervene in the market, the market should be allowed to return to freedom.
E.g:
Creat a Funds (buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders)
Nxt market prices :0.0002 BTC
New Nxt user (e.g: Each bitcointalk user) can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC from Funds.
If this Nxt user want to buy more, he will join the market exchange price 0.0002 BTC.
So the new user can afford the price. and does not interfere with other early investors.
Now Your team intervention in the market, ineffective and too blind.
@CFB:
Maybe we should set up a fund, buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders at price 0.0001 BTC, and then use the fund defines each person can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC. (No matter market prices change)
And The sold part of NXT not to intervene in the market, the market should be allowed to return to freedom. Because this is buyer property, you cannot be too much intervention.
E.g:
Creat a Funds (buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders)
Nxt market prices :0.0002 BTC
New Nxt user (Each bitcointalk user) can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC from Funds.
If this Nxt user wanted to buy more, he will join the market exchange price 0.0002 BTC.
So the new user can afford the price. and does not interfere with other early investors.
Maybe we should set up a fund, buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders at price 0.0001 BTC, and then use the fund defines each person can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC. (No matter market prices change)
And The sold part of NXT not to intervene in the market, the market should be allowed to return to freedom. Because this is buyer property, you cannot be too much intervention.
E.g:
Creat a Funds (buy part of NXT back from the original stakeholders)
Nxt market prices :0.0002 BTC
New Nxt user (Each bitcointalk user) can only buy 10000 NXT @0.00012 BTC from Funds.
If this Nxt user wanted to buy more, he will join the market exchange price 0.0002 BTC.
So the new user can afford the price. and does not interfere with other early investors.
why do you want to keep the price low? I'm not saying you are wrong or anything to want that. Just curious.
Lower price makes big stakeholders to sell more.
sorry to be a pain but could you elaborate on your thought process here.
Maybe it should be acquired to stakeholders, buy back a portion of the NXT, used to Technology Development Award.
Let the market return to freedom?
Otherwise, this may cause the market intervention, and stakeholders can exchange to hold more through market