Search content
Sort by
Showing 2 of 2 results by crankycrypto
And yes, I might be a bit upset there as well, sorry, next time I'll be more precise and "nice" 
Great stuff. I normally pass on drama but wow that was fun to read.
Ocminer, you have the cyrpto spirit and what is right about crypto.
98% of these folks are money first. Money would have a developer to sweep sh t under the rug and keep running while the issue is fixed.
this woudl reduce the greatest fraud and loss to the end users. But true integrity would make an announcement, stop the system, fix and start again. Yes this would/could give negative press, yes this could lower your coin price, yes you could get delisted. yes it is a bad day. But if integrity is greater than profits you will make the right choice.
Corporations and greed for profit has all but destroyed the human race. It's time to grow up.
It seems making a million a year is alot of money, till most make it. Then a million a month, then a week. When does it end?
Wealth is good, feels great but without integrity it is worthless, it becomes a means of distraction rather than wealth.
BTW, yes you got a little childish and very mean in your chat... but I loved it. lol
I really wanted to invest in this ICO.
But IF this post was truly the CEO of VIT I will not be investing. Infact I have no way to determine if this is the CEO but I will take this as the red flag that made me run.
If this person, 'CEO' was offended it could have been said in 1 sly insult. But this person had to keep going time and time again. Reminds me of the personality of the CEO of Groupon.
I get the fact that the SEC will require you to register (can restrict USA and Canada investors) if you claim your investors will make a profit, SO some ICO will try to play word games and not call it an ICO and also RUN when/if folks ask if they will make a profit or will it 'be listed on an exchange'.
The professional response is "we cannont comment on the expected actions of exchanges or other corporations." And when a prospective investor asks that question 100 times your response is the same. This is not fun but if you have ever been to court you will see this often. Ask the same question 100 ways and the response should be the same. I know it is not a fun way to WASTE time but when you stick to the law and act professionally it can be dull and seem like a waste of time.
I AM PASSING ON THIS crowdsource/ICO.
EIGHT Insults, an adult would make one direct and maybe a implication and then attempt to show credit. But instead this 'CEO' is trying to say, "IF you talk about that we will be in violation of SEC requirements for not registering as a secruity."
IF they were smart enough to say this in a legal and professional manner i would be sending ETH today. But that failed to happen. PASS
But IF this post was truly the CEO of VIT I will not be investing. Infact I have no way to determine if this is the CEO but I will take this as the red flag that made me run.
If this person, 'CEO' was offended it could have been said in 1 sly insult. But this person had to keep going time and time again. Reminds me of the personality of the CEO of Groupon.
I get the fact that the SEC will require you to register (can restrict USA and Canada investors) if you claim your investors will make a profit, SO some ICO will try to play word games and not call it an ICO and also RUN when/if folks ask if they will make a profit or will it 'be listed on an exchange'.
The professional response is "we cannont comment on the expected actions of exchanges or other corporations." And when a prospective investor asks that question 100 times your response is the same. This is not fun but if you have ever been to court you will see this often. Ask the same question 100 ways and the response should be the same. I know it is not a fun way to WASTE time but when you stick to the law and act professionally it can be dull and seem like a waste of time.
I AM PASSING ON THIS crowdsource/ICO.
EIGHT Insults, an adult would make one direct and maybe a implication and then attempt to show credit. But instead this 'CEO' is trying to say, "IF you talk about that we will be in violation of SEC requirements for not registering as a secruity."
IF they were smart enough to say this in a legal and professional manner i would be sending ETH today. But that failed to happen. PASS
Hi. Im VITCEO
While you may find enjoyment in denigrating (ONE) our excellent team, the industry we are in and the value we are bringing to our community and to Steem, I can not emphasize more than I have that WE WILL NOT ENGAGE OR PROMOTE USELESS, LOOSE UNEDUCATED (TWO) CHATTER CONCERNING ANY TYPES OF SPECULATION AND DISCUSSION OF EXCHANGES AS THIS WOULD HARM OUR CROWDSALE.
Rather than act like petulant children (THREE) with a desire to do harm and whatever you please to anyone you please, and ignoring our regulatory constraints, why dont you take the time to educate yourselves (FOUR But accurate) on the limitations of a crowdsale. If you can help yourselves and collectively stop,engaging in a shared lack of common sense, please try to act like adults (FIVE) and not gossiping children (SIX) who may or may not like the fact they were banned from Telegram because - again - you refused to educate yourselves (SEVEN) and instead chose to childishly (EIGHT) spread rumors, untruths an innuendo.
Carry on.
VITCEO
While you may find enjoyment in denigrating (ONE) our excellent team, the industry we are in and the value we are bringing to our community and to Steem, I can not emphasize more than I have that WE WILL NOT ENGAGE OR PROMOTE USELESS, LOOSE UNEDUCATED (TWO) CHATTER CONCERNING ANY TYPES OF SPECULATION AND DISCUSSION OF EXCHANGES AS THIS WOULD HARM OUR CROWDSALE.
Rather than act like petulant children (THREE) with a desire to do harm and whatever you please to anyone you please, and ignoring our regulatory constraints, why dont you take the time to educate yourselves (FOUR But accurate) on the limitations of a crowdsale. If you can help yourselves and collectively stop,engaging in a shared lack of common sense, please try to act like adults (FIVE) and not gossiping children (SIX) who may or may not like the fact they were banned from Telegram because - again - you refused to educate yourselves (SEVEN) and instead chose to childishly (EIGHT) spread rumors, untruths an innuendo.
Carry on.
VITCEO