Oh shit.. now is Investors fault    

I'm really sorry if I posted my concerns here.. Sorry Waves Team.
I will stop ask any kind of clarification and I'll let Sasha taking his time to properly reply to all our concerns.
I shouldn't even think to bother you, only because I gave you my BTCs -together with all the other ICO Investors- to fund your project (without Waves Project would never been existed) and you are randomly spending these BTCs for who know what. These are your BTCs now. You can buy whatever you want.
Sorry again.

I'll come back in about 2-3 years to read your answers.
Hopefully that will give you enough time.

There shouldn't even be any need for anymore fud since everyone is aware we are below ico  prices, ,with the amount of money the team has to spend though this project should be one with a great amount of potential and definitely one to keep an eye o.   

I agree.
And that's what we called Robbing people.
This is basically what Sasha did to initial Investors.
Building up a fake ICO final amount to decrease the investors Quotes,  giving them much less..  That means earning more and spending less.
2 ways bargain for them.
But unfortunately is illegal.

If someone contributed 100 btc it now offers him the same incentive as someone who only buys in and receives the same amount for almost half of that principal amount while at the same time this person reaps double the benefits while contributing nothing while the original contributor is rewarded by having his units cut through negative equity by the depreciation of market value.Is this fair.Is this project fair to those who contributed?Yes or no?

The real issue with people here is this. "Why did anyone even bother funding this project if you can now buy waves tokens for almost half of its ICO price?" There is NO logical reason for anyone to be content with what way the investors who funded this project and gave it its ability to develop have been treated.They have been shit on due to this very fact "Anyone who did not contribute is now rewarded while those who sacrificed their liquidity(mainly smaller investors who put their last cent in)have had their investment decimated"

These are the facts and this is the reality.

Yeah LISK seriously has raised the bar on how to run a proper ICO and post-launch.  Max has done a stellar job.  I don't hold any LISK any more (sold at 3x ICO on launch day), but seriously respect what he has done, regardless of whether he just re-marketed Crypti or not - he's made a great effort.  

The sad thing is, so many people were bashing LISK as they invested in Waves.  Sasha was saying how he's going to prevent the problems with the LISK launch by changing the way Waves are distributed at launch.  Not making it automatic.  How ass-backwards is that?  To prevent DDOS, he's going back to 1995 and doing things manually on a 29,634 BTC funded project.  It's like saying because XYZ company failed at handling email, we'll revert to paper mail and responding to messages by handwriting.  Real smart.  But it is sneaky, in that this method of manual distribution slows down investors from dumping while insiders dump.  LISK never went below ICO price and is still roughly 4x depending on when you got into the ICO.  It went up to 8x for some.  The DDOS on LISK never lost money for anyone, and it was very short-lived.  And yet, Sasha was telling Uncle Tai how he would prevent all the problems with LISK's launch.  

Looking back, I was fooled.  But in retrospect, LISK is operated way more professionally, and as an investor, I don't care if the tech in Waves is better or not (it's non-existent at this point)... as an investor you want ROI or at least not lose 50% ... you want to be comforted when you lose money, and Waves is doing none of that PR comforting.  And I am upset that Sasha criticized LISK so much early on, yet fared considerably worse, and seems to not only not care, but enjoys trolling investors and blaming them for having weak hands.  Pretty disgusting to say the least.

Ethereum got down from about 800.000 sats (august 15) to prices below 200.000 sats (october 15) when trading started.
the price started to grow above the 200.000 sat in january 16.
so a little patience is advisable.