Dear "Real" Zoin team, at least please listen to wise men.

“Those who know do not speak. Those who speak do not know.”
                                                   ― Lao Tsu, Tao Teh Ching

Is it just me who feels L. Sunshine character's english is pretty bad for a native speaker? The record is becoming a bit old now, repeating the same thing all the time.

Fascinating how this young man has so much knowledge that feels like he almost single-handedly managed to code all the necessary changes in BTG. The responsibility is immense. The whole worlds is looking at him now. There is a reason why all this is happening. We just don't know or will never know the full extent of this BTG endeavour.

Ok, here's one outdated list to start with on page 4

Hi,

With so much "cutlery" a.k.a. forks around, has anyone even tried to create a list of cryptocurrency hard forks to keep track of things?
I was wondering how many of us don't really even know that there has been another chain split. The reason for this is quite obvious - if you had funds on the forked chain then you may have some funds in limbo.

Cheers

Dealing with supply charge 0.75 cents per day, electricity charge 0.21 cents per kW unit.

Worth checking if motherboard chipset drivers are up-to-date or any system related driver in that matter. Manufacturer website should provide the right files for download.
Apply UEFI (BIOS) update, if available.

Your miner is set to mine SIGT, pool receives shares for SIGT, you get paid SIGT in the background, pool bot continuously moves your earnings (let's say accumulated earnings every 15min) to supported exchange, automatically sell SIGT/buy BTC and nominate transacted BTC to your account. Now the SIGT/BTC rate for that particular transaction may not be the most favourable. I assume this is what you were asking...
What has been pointed out is you accumulate SIGT, then move SIGT to exchange and make the transaction yourself when candle chart has some nice green bars in the higher ranges. Though, writing about it is always easier than applying the theory in real situations.

Leass, have you tested (very likely though) all these cards side-by-side with default settings? I've been wondering how big of a difference there is between them. Would anyone spend that extra money if the cards actually hash at the same rate with stock factory settings.
One of the reasonings for spending extra is relying on the resale price in the future. For example, buying second hand Galax/KFA2 or Gigabyte Aorus 18 months later? It's like, Galax who, but costs less for sure and could earn you the same money while crunching bits.

Based on simple empirical approach, pointing 1080Ti towards XZC, got me into believing that accumulating this coin is actually worth it. lyra2z algo stresses GPU a lot less - temperatures are lower more than 10C° @100% TDP (default settings) compared to ZEC statistics. Power graph shows ~2.4kW for XZC and 2.7kW when hashing ZEC. All about marginal gains these days ...

Or from an other perspective - it's so confusing when there are too many choices a.k.a. The paralyzing problem of too many choices which was introduced in '70's.

General consensus earlier seemed to agree that any recent driver version is equal in performance. Have kept version 384.76
EWBF's Zcash CUDA miner 0.3.4b, +100 Core, 95% TDP (does this categorise as stock or overclock, not sure).

It's been pretty confusing for the most part to keep up with the so called most-profitable-coin movement. As universalresonance pointed out it really is easy to set and forget at first but after a while simple human curiosity takes over which may end up losing money.
1080Ti for ZEC has been not too bad recently and looking at the current price pump rewards some of those patient miners.

I've been mucking around with different coins in MPH to yield more bling and seem to default back to XZC for CPU. Although the recent jump in difficulty was not the most interesting things to see. Turned out a group of individuals found a way to manipulate with Amazon AWS service. Go figure!

So with current 5-5.5k difficulty and 2.3 MH/s, MPH is rewarding the user with 0.25 XZC/Day (which at the time of writing is 2.29 USD).

To compare the above with others while having the same CPU setup:
Grosetlcoin: 200-500 difficulty, 3.5 GRS/Day, 0.43 USD
Zclassic: ~40k dificulty, 0.18 ZCL/Day, 0.24 USD
Granite: so bad ... wrong algo
and so on...

Even without patiently waiting for larger statistics/data sets to analyse XZC is a good option. Zcoin is officially deemed as CPU-friendly anyway.

If you are now wondering is mining with CPU profitable - no.