Omega Genomics Corp is raising $50,000,000 on a $400,000,000 valuation.

Go ahead and invest in Bitcoin 2.0. Bitcointalk has been modifying and deleting my posts to alter reality - especially my last post because they don’t want to believe it.

Bitcoin 2.0 is the best of all protocols only I can do. If you don’t believe me just look at my pedigree.

Eventually there will be an upgrade site.

Send BTC to

1HsZmv1jSu6JsmkMt84oDwhKVc7bWeD2Qx

Comment below with how much BTC you sent with what address and a signature so everyone knows.

We’ll see how it goes. In life everything boils down to trust. Just listen to your gut at how much money you could make.

Thanks,
Datz

Crypto is fucked without me. I have the final protocol. Sucks for you all. All crypto is worth zero. I have been in it from the beginning studying my ass off. Until you all message me all your private keys for all crypto you have I’ll let you starve out. Thanks.

Here is a podcast in which I speak on per request monetization middleware.

I will make an offer if English speaking individuals participate in funding first.

I am scared of the XRP for one reason: programmed deflation.

Ripple Labs claims to have signed partnerships with big banks around the world. To my understanding, banks will have internal ledgers and may do settlements between each other on the Ripple Consensus Ledger using the Interledger Protocol. From my experience, Ripple Labs has made marketing claims with little technical infrastructure before: i.e. Codius. So, I'm not sure how it will all play out. I do know there is a possibility to capture mainstream adaption from consumer banking.

Yes. I am a programmer and engineer. Matthew raided Peercover. Jack left Peercover with him. I developed the Peercover platform and intellectual property used by Augur (model). I did not agree with its use and conversion to an ICO. I think the Augur Foundation (Canadian) is a bad cloak for business that is not legal under U.S. law since the project's founders are American.

I have some features in mind for Bitcoin 2.0 and a rough architecture.

Since Ripple Labs never granted me when it was the company's best interest to do so, hurt Peercover several times, and discriminated against me, I decided to fork three Ripple gits for Bitcoin 2.0.

I don't actually care that much about Bitcoin 2.0 but I know the ideal in terms of features and functionality.

I could spec Bitcoin 2.0 in the gits and hope some developers show up.

I don't know how much the original Ripple code base will help, only suspect we could transform it into what Bitcoin needs. I do believe I have a role here since I have some intellectual property and legal indicators that Ripple Labs owes me money. Who knows, they might pay me first and annul this proposition, or I could raise enough money to sue properly instead.

Why are people still falling for this? It's the same formula over and over again. Vitalik Buterin is committing theft and fraud.

And wtf is up with this? Why does Augur think it's legitimate?

My skills are sharp enough that I can produce a standalone platform with many functions. I have backing. I need funding here. Regardless of my protocol views, I can return definitely for investors by law alone. Again, this is the only legitimate offering in cryptocurrency right now. Last time I got strung along and mined because I did not have proper funding.

I have received several criticisms about my tone, intentions, and ability.

I used "I" statements in the founder's story for a reason. A founder's story indicates connection, and, in this case, legal capital. An employee from Ripple Labs decided my legal capital disqualifies me from a forum. Legal capital is the greatest predictor of success of an enterprise. I have stated facts, not adjusted my tone to suit the offering.

My intentions are not to be good or bad for Bitcoin. My intentions are to produce long term returns for investors of this specific enterprise.

My abilities are adequate for producing a platform that will suit the needs of adapters for several years. I don't pretend to know what people should or should not do. I put my assets on the table. That is all.

You are right. I need to hone in. My work got left on the table and I need to compile it into one platform.

I received a reply. They said I could start pushing to fix issues in the issues section. I don't do open source and already have a code base for a final product.

I'm going to let Bitcoin ride and step in with a new git if need be.

The problem now is cash. This fundraise has to be successful. It's the only legitimate offering out right now.

Thanks for the advice. Done.

The core team needs to acknowledge my existence.

I will continue to entertain the discussion here, but it should not affect the offering.

This offering does not destroy bitcoins.

This is a Regulation S offering for an enterprise of high capability.

Ripple Labs has a plan to destroy Bitcoin. I have a plan to save Bitcoin. If you are my friend, then believe in me.