Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 1,445 results by dave111223
Re: Artificial Intelligence (AI) trades on my exchange account. +74.1%?
I have been very interested in automatic trading and I have never seen a single algorithm that wins in the long term (Im talking about the crypto market, not traditional market). The crypto market is beginning cycles that are almost unpredictable with panic movements. So unless you constantly adapt your algorithm to the market, I don't see how it can be profitable in the long term... But I'll follow your topic by curiosity !
Re: Will You Trust a Project Announce BY A Legendary Member
Yes, I will. because I believe legendary members are more knowledged and will not want to have bad reputation on there position. But in the same vein it doesn't need to necessarily be a lengendary. I have been involved in some project that are handled by members status and it was making sense. And vice versa.
I have seen junior members having more knowledge than legendary members, better ignore rank and research project before investing, after all, your money is at stake here.Same, most of the "interesting" and really "educated" people in the local part of the forum I frequent are neither heroes nor legendaries. Just passionate people who arrived a little later and didn't necessarily race for messages and ranking. They are the ones who should be merit in priority !
I was never a supporter of stable corners. The idea is good, so as not to come out in fiat in difficult times, but I'm not sure that a stable corner, however solid it may be, can cope with a wave of buying or selling.... The stories about tether and bitfinex have even done a lot of damage to the image of crypto...
Check out the latest google invention.... A processor capable of doing in 3 minutes what summit (the most powerful computer in the world made in IBM) would have done in 10,000 years... It could change a lot of things in the world of crypto, such computing power.... And at the same time it will make it possible to achieve very beautiful things!
No their quantum computer is different to the quantum computers which would be a threat to Bitcoin. However if it were to be used against Bitcoin and we went on with the assumption that it could contribute to the networks processing power. Do you know how much money that quantum computer takes to build? Then you have running costs and maintenance and when considering these which could be used for more beneficial projects I doubt the government would be happy with Google processing some Bitcoin transactions on the network. Then its the problem of there only being one of these quantum computers in existence and looking at the price to both build and maintain the machine there would probably not be very many people who would be able to afford it which means it would have little effect on the difficulty of Bitcoin mining and all of this is assuming its appropriate to mine Bitcoins which it is not.
I totally agree with you. These will clearly not be the priorities. Afterwards, we can also think that with Moore's theory, which will be less and less true, the individual will have easier and easier access to machines capable of breaking these codes. I'm not talking about the next 5 years, but 20 years from now, it doesn't really seem stupid... Just look at the progress that has been made over the past 20 years. Not sure that quantum computers remain the property of big groups for very long...
You can ask here on the marketplace by setting the quantity, price and your location. There may be people who are interested. If your country's tax system is advantageous, why not transfer them directly via SEPA via an exchange that accepts fiat currencies? It's fast and the costs are almost non-existent for some. After that, it's money you have to declare....
Personally, I believe that the matter is not only in big capital, but also in many other factors, such as experience, knowledge, trading skills, etc. It is very easy to lose any amount of money in the cryptocurrency market, so let's be careful.
It's an amateur market, most people came here knowing nothing about it... I think that since the beginning, many more people have lost money than people have earned. Certainly they are not the same amounts, but many people have started without knowing anything about crypto, just thinking of the "easy money"....
For me, it is a certainty that cryptos will never replace fiat currencies. There will be a parallel economy and the btc will become a currency like USD, EUR etc... with a parity for each pair, but not a substitute currency. And that's good, because the global economy would be shaken up, it wouldn't make any sense.
Strangely James Bilal Caan claims that he was the founder of bitcoin.. But lost his hard drive.. Is this possible??
What you guys think about James? Why he use this type of statement.. Specially his explanation about his hard drive?
What you guys think about James? Why he use this type of statement.. Specially his explanation about his hard drive?
Anyone can pretend to be Satoshi Nakamoto but have you ever wonder why he claims that he is satoshi nakamoto yet he is not cautious in his things and he lost important to him. So, I think he is just one of the stupid people who wants to get attention and be fame.
Same thought and I think it's a shame. Well after that it's all about Bitcoin, but all those so-called "satoshi nakamoto" who wake up when the BTC becomes popular and who have no way of proving it, I don't believe it and will never believe it. It goes against the philosophy of decentralization itself
Très intéressante ton analyse Yogg, je n'avais jamais réfléchis à ce double système NP. Cela dit, il me semble avoir vu passer un article récemment sur le dernier bijoux made in google... Une sorte de supercalculateur capable de faire en 3.2 minutes, ce que Summit (lgtps considéré comme l'ordi le plus puissant du monde crée par IBM) aurait fait en 10.000 ans (les chiffres ne sont peut-être plus exacte, mais c'était cet ordre de grandeur)... Donc bon...
To be honest, CMC has been accused of manipulating prices and display fake volume several times so i wouldn't be surprised if they messed with something yesterday.
I had read about it, was it true at the end? I don't really see the kind of manipulation that can be done by changing prices on CMC,
CoinMarketCaps Fake Data Problem; Facebooks Libra Scams
Fake Trading Volume on Exchanges and Coinmarketcap
Thank you very much for your answer and for your links. Such news does not necessarily do much good for crypto.... Anyway, I never go on it except to see the total capitalization of the market or to take a quick look at the general trend. The rest of the time, I have my favorites and alarms on TV!
CMC takes into account several prices from different exchanges and then gets an average price so you shouldn't expect the btc price on this site to 100% match with other exchanges. With that in mind, perhaps yesterday one of the exchanges glitched or something else happened which made CMC show a higher price (?).
To be honest, CMC has been accused of manipulating prices and display fake volume several times so i wouldn't be surprised if they messed with something yesterday.
To be honest, CMC has been accused of manipulating prices and display fake volume several times so i wouldn't be surprised if they messed with something yesterday.
I had read about it, was it true at the end? I don't really see the kind of manipulation that can be done by changing prices on CMC, as long as the real price is the one displayed on the exchange, where the trading is done... Wasn't it just the misunderstanding of some in the functioning of an exchange?
I didn't look in detail at what you say, but you have to know that a price is specific to an exchange, right? It depends on bid and ask. There may be price differences from one exchange to another and playing on this is called arbitrage. But quickly prices still end up converging towards each other, if liquidity is present...
Check out the latest google invention.... A processor capable of doing in 3 minutes what summit (the most powerful computer in the world made in IBM) would have done in 10,000 years... It could change a lot of things in the world of crypto, such computing power.... And at the same time it will make it possible to achieve very beautiful things!
Re: Bitcoin vs Gold? Which one you would choose to invest for long term? Why ?
Even if the physical aspect of gold is very satisfying and numismatics is a very beautiful science that allows us to understand a little better the history of our country, I think that progress is forcing us to invest in Bitcoin, whose advantages over gold are undeniable... And then, apart from speculation, nobody invests in gold anymore today, the growth potential is ridiculous!
Re: 3 Years Ago I Lost 5 BTCs from a Scam Sent From BitcoinTalk.org Official Email
Everyone has similar stories of loss of bitcoins for one reason or another. It seems to me that the bitcointalk database was hacked a few years ago and that encrypted accounts are now recoverable on the deep. You always have to be very suspicious, especially when people contact you directly...
There have already been charities financed in crypto. We can't really talk about the future for Bitcoin or the purpose of use, since it's a currency.... On the other hand, we can expect that adoption by the general public will increase and that more and more of our payments will be made in crypto ! More and more good causes and less and less bad causes !
Re: Are you still excited when there is news about the real Satoshi coming up
No excitement. I hope and think we'll never know who is satoshi. The philosophy on which the creation of Bitcoin is based would go against that. Any guy who claims to be satoshi is necessarily a usurper. This would mean centralizing his creation on one man and that is absolutely not the purpose of his creation...