Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 42 results by daxxog
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
is there a possibility of letting clamd run as service? systemctl tells me fail 
Here is a sorta hacky version I used to set up a clamd service on ubuntu 18: https://gist.github.com/daxxog/a2f5db9cbe5fd02770764ba183dc6504
I also have gotten it working on a raspberry pi before.
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
but why after all this time, clam not have a little exchange like crex24, stex or similar? price for listing are really low, all clam community can pay a little bit and enter in a normal exchange
Don't forget that there's also BTCPOP.co that has CLAM listed. They even stake!
But yeah the biggest difficulty right now is getting an exchange that can get listed on the damn CLAM page on CMC.
If we already had freebitcoins and btcpop that would already give the coin back some legitimacy.
I remember the good times when it was listed on Bittrex and Poloniex
.I guess we could try with crex24 and stex.
kucoin https://coinmarketcap.com/exchanges/kucoin/ also might be a good place to get CLAM listed. I recently saw they are focusing on proof of stake coins and added a staking feature to their exchange (but not sure if orders stake like they do on BTCPOP).
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
⭐ Merited by BayAreaCoins (1)
Hi, guys i have a problem...can't sync my qt wallet, it ctuck on 2097394 block...i downloaded v1.4.17 from official site, downloaded bootstrap.dat from this https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=623147.msg9772191#msg9772191 post and put it in folder where my wallet.dat is....it goes fine till wallet renamed it (bootstrap.dat.old) sync stopped on that block...I made clam.conf and add some nodes but still nothing...on client i see a have 16 active connections... "importing blocks" in lower left corner is gone and it's really annoying because i lost 5-6 hours (in last 4 days) on this... 
Finally, after 10 days i was able to sync my QT wallet...in 5 years of my mining experience i have never seen .....naaaah, it takes to much of my time... never mind. Good luck to all who have this....."coin".
Very slow syncing is a known problem with the CLAM client... unfortunately no one has figured out why, yet. If your client stays open everything works fine, but if you leave things for a few days, the debug log gets filled with errors like "ORPHAN BLOCK 751" and "already have block..."
Just a warning, do NOT use Yobit for CLAM (or anything, really)
If anyone is trying to get CLAM (headless daemon) working on Ubuntu 18.10, Iv'e got a one liner for you:
Code:
curl -L https://gist.githubusercontent.com/daxxog/a2f5db9cbe5fd02770764ba183dc6504/raw/clambuntu.sh | sh
My code works around the ORPHAN BLOCK 751 bug by restarting the daemon if it finds the error in the logs.. Not the most elegant solution, but it works. This script also grabs the latest bootstrap from doog's aws. I also have a version for raspberry pi 3, which is pretty similar since the pi (raspbian) is Debian based (like Ubuntu is).
Feel free to look at the source code (bash):
https://gist.github.com/daxxog/a2f5db9cbe5fd02770764ba183dc6504
Raspberry Pi 3 version: (I haven't updated this to add the "751 fix")
https://gist.github.com/daxxog/8389a1540bb3b69366a892d0a4613257
You don't even need a 3rd party app. A long time ago, I was able to auto-roll by modifying some code on the main page using Firefox. A million rolls. I enjoyed playing that way, but eventually lost.
You can lose 8 times in a row even if you have it set to 90% chance to win.
No one would do million rolls because they know they will busted if they keep playing on any dice sites.You can lose 8 times in a row even if you have it set to 90% chance to win.
Anyway, on yesterday i received an email from Poloniex about they are going to delist CLAM soon, which made CLAN price down a lot because of dumping from people. What will you do dooglus? Once poloniex fully delist CLANM, it's mean there are only 1 exchange for CLAM, thats Yobit. https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/clams/#markets
What about these exchanges?
https://freebitcoins.com/xchange/market/BTC_CLAM
https://btcpop.co/Exchange/CLAM
LLTGC
Edit: I've heard from other CLAM users that yobit is just as trashy as poloniex when it comes to deposits / withdrawals. What's up with these exchanges being incompetent with blockchain tech?
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
Just letting everyone know that I have had a much better Clam exchanging experience at btcpop.co over poloniex. Poloniex always had these random wallet issues, whereas btcpop.co would always process my withdrawals instantly. Hopefully more clam users start using this exchange so there can be more volume / liquidity. There is a really big spread with market making opportunities right now.
Note: I am not affiliated with btcpop in any way besides being a user on their exchange.
PS: I can't wait to try the xploited / BAC exchange when it is up.
LLTGC
Note: I am not affiliated with btcpop in any way besides being a user on their exchange.
PS: I can't wait to try the xploited / BAC exchange when it is up.
LLTGC
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
The polo delist looks like the end for clam
Still listed on https://btcpop.co/
This isn't the end for CLAM, it is only the beginning.
Looking to swap some LTC for CLAM . Any idea when your swap exchange is going to have more available? Also looking forward to having another non-poloniex market for CLAM. The more reliable / trustworthy CLAM services the better IMHO.
It appears as though both block explorers are offline. Both http://clamsight.com/ and http://www.presstab.pw/phpexplorer/CLAM/ are offline right now 9:06 PM UTC Wednesday, October 25, 2017. If CLAM ever want's to be a successful project with more mainstream adoption, I suggest that there be a working block explorer that is running 24/7. Maybe something like https://github.com/iquidus/explorer or https://github.com/bitpay/insight running on AWS? Maybe using advertising to offset hosting costs?
EDIT: I just read the post above mine, please update the main post to include http://khashier.com/
EDIT: I just read the post above mine, please update the main post to include http://khashier.com/
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
Hey guys. I just posted a suggestion on freewallet.org for the developer to integrate CLAM into their wallet service. I think this would be excellent for the CLAM comunity as we are in need of a mobile wallet, and it also would spread awareness about the CLAM project. Please for "CLAM Wallet" at: https://freewallet.org/vote
A couple of things:1) I read here that freewallet.org holds user private keys, so you have to trust them not to exit-scam. I'm not sure that's a good idea. Most wallets let the user have exclusive control of their own private keys.
2) I don't see any way of voting on the page you linked to. Do I need to make an account or something first? Edit: oh, it was because I had javascript disabled. Never mind...
Ewww...
Edit:
I think this is pertinent - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F12lpqnug-0
Yes I am aware of that, and I personally would approach such a service with caution. You must trust the holder of your private keys (as a trust doog with my CLAMs). I still encourage CLAM users to vote to spread awareness of the project, even if they don't intend on using the wallet personally.
Re: [ANN][CLAM] CLAMs, Proof-Of-Chain, Proof-Of-Working-Stake, a.k.a. "Clamcoin"
Hey guys. I just posted a suggestion on freewallet.org for the developer to integrate CLAM into their wallet service. I think this would be excellent for the CLAM comunity as we are in need of a mobile wallet, and it also would spread awareness about the CLAM project. Please for "CLAM Wallet" at: https://freewallet.org/vote . Thank you for your support.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | VM | POBS | J-D wager | Looking for more devs.
XCP Issue #775 has been closed. https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterwallet/issues/775
Thus I was finally able to lock the XCP asset! https://counterpartychain.io/asset/DARKCLAM
Truth. Trust. Peace. Happiness.
Thus I was finally able to lock the XCP asset! https://counterpartychain.io/asset/DARKCLAM
Truth. Trust. Peace. Happiness.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | VM CHAIN| POBS | J-D wager | VOTE NOW!
Remaining DC has been burnt. Currently attempting to lock the token, but encountering an error with the XCP system. I'll keep you guys updated. If for some reason I can't lock it, I will just "transfer ownership" to a burn address which will have a similar effect.
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterwallet/issues/775
https://github.com/CounterpartyXCP/counterwallet/issues/775
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | VOTE NOW!
For my darkclam followers and believers:
I have been very busy studying the ethereum VM and creating rough draft ideas and concepts for darkclam. No this doesn't mean darkclam is going to be an eth asset or on the ether blockchain in any way. It simply means I am "borrowing" some technology from them and putting it in my project. With all eyes on eth at the moment, using this technology also gives some credibility to darkclam since it is using a VM already published open source in another project. I currently have the VM figured out to the point where I can call certain functions in a smart contract (essential in the darkclam system). You can check all my progress at: https://github.com/daxxog/darkclam
Here is an excerpt from commit:42a56e8404f1977540c8abd6b1491d9fb562cabc for my programmers out there (maybe it will help you understand it better):
For all the haters out there: fuck all of you.
I have been very busy studying the ethereum VM and creating rough draft ideas and concepts for darkclam. No this doesn't mean darkclam is going to be an eth asset or on the ether blockchain in any way. It simply means I am "borrowing" some technology from them and putting it in my project. With all eyes on eth at the moment, using this technology also gives some credibility to darkclam since it is using a VM already published open source in another project. I currently have the VM figured out to the point where I can call certain functions in a smart contract (essential in the darkclam system). You can check all my progress at: https://github.com/daxxog/darkclam
Here is an excerpt from commit:42a56e8404f1977540c8abd6b1491d9fb562cabc for my programmers out there (maybe it will help you understand it better):
Code:
npm install -g ethereumjs-codesim
ethereumjs-codesim -C -f echo-test.sol --use-contract 'Echo' --callmethod 'Test(bytes32)' 'echo'
TODO: translate this into a system for the CLAM blockchain
The darkclam hypervisor manages:
* storage/memory management
* checkpoints / history
* magnet system
* eXtended/abi/cmd/json/system xajs
* gas management
* rpc system
* extended ABI system (new types)
Input -
Magnet - magnet links as data input
Output -
Function - an specially encoded function call, can be used to call code in other VMs
* dependencies
* x-vm communication
where new DCVM(Buffer bytecode, Buffer trie, Object abi)
(note, this constructor is ussually called from the Hypervisor)
bytecode - The VM bytecode, loaded from the [package-name].vm file
trie - The previous VM state, a Patricia Merkle Tree expressed as a Buffer
abi - The abi definition as a JavaScript Object, loaded from the [package-name].json file
DCVM.run(Object block, Integer index, Array args, Function cb(Buffer trie, Error err, Buffer return, Integer gasUsed, Array logs), Integer value)
(note, uses automatic ABI system, to make functions more dynamic)
block - the Block containing this transaction (encoded and sent to the Function)
index - the index of this transaction in the block (encoded and sent to the Function)
args[0] - The function name (entry point)
args[1 - ARG_LIMIT] - The arguments for the function (automatically encoded)
cb -
trie - The next VM state (hypervisor manages confirmations with a run/rewind system backed by the checkpoint system), a Patricia Merkle Tree expressed as a Buffer; if err return lastState :)
err - Graceful failing for VMs
return - Buffer data to return to the Hypervisor (for x-vm communication and direct function calling)
gasused - Amount of gas used running the selected function, passed back to Hypervisor for x-vm communication
logs - An Array of logs spit out by the function code
value - The value transacted (default 0)
ethereumjs-codesim -C -f echo-test.sol --use-contract 'Echo' --callmethod 'Test(bytes32)' 'echo'
TODO: translate this into a system for the CLAM blockchain
The darkclam hypervisor manages:
* storage/memory management
* checkpoints / history
* magnet system
* eXtended/abi/cmd/json/system xajs
* gas management
* rpc system
* extended ABI system (new types)
Input -
Magnet - magnet links as data input
Output -
Function - an specially encoded function call, can be used to call code in other VMs
* dependencies
* x-vm communication
where new DCVM(Buffer bytecode, Buffer trie, Object abi)
(note, this constructor is ussually called from the Hypervisor)
bytecode - The VM bytecode, loaded from the [package-name].vm file
trie - The previous VM state, a Patricia Merkle Tree expressed as a Buffer
abi - The abi definition as a JavaScript Object, loaded from the [package-name].json file
DCVM.run(Object block, Integer index, Array args, Function cb(Buffer trie, Error err, Buffer return, Integer gasUsed, Array logs), Integer value)
(note, uses automatic ABI system, to make functions more dynamic)
block - the Block containing this transaction (encoded and sent to the Function)
index - the index of this transaction in the block (encoded and sent to the Function)
args[0] - The function name (entry point)
args[1 - ARG_LIMIT] - The arguments for the function (automatically encoded)
cb -
trie - The next VM state (hypervisor manages confirmations with a run/rewind system backed by the checkpoint system), a Patricia Merkle Tree expressed as a Buffer; if err return lastState :)
err - Graceful failing for VMs
return - Buffer data to return to the Hypervisor (for x-vm communication and direct function calling)
gasused - Amount of gas used running the selected function, passed back to Hypervisor for x-vm communication
logs - An Array of logs spit out by the function code
value - The value transacted (default 0)
For all the haters out there: fuck all of you.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | VOTE NOW!
Heh, 5 claimers with 6,538. DC has same voice as 5 with 2,512,788. Wager, there is no fairness there cjmapope?
hee hee
honestly it was just my own opinion that basically rewarding those who have gambled the most was unfair
in the end it's your coin, but in the end it's also my choice to not advocate gambling and/or being rewarded for gambling
i will still support how i can, but only so much as my conscience allows ;p
But i do see that they hold the same weight voting wise, and i do like seeing that
(which was your initial point, but atlas my basic understanding of counterparty voting mislead me ;p)
try not be so wound up, i know it's hard with people not shitting straight rainbows on this idea, but it will be ok ;;
)))To be clear, voting is based on token amounts not number of transactions. If this system was based on number of transactions, someone could send 1 vote token to a million addresses and sabotage the vote.
as of block 401489:
1DARKCLAMxDooGXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZPbYip has 0.05843282% of the vote with 6,538.03037584 tokens.
1DARKCLAMxBURNXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVvbpkg has 22.45772632% of the vote with 2,512,788.27224520 tokens.
Such a system wouldn't be fair given each person could have created as many addresses as they wanted before the drop. So one person could end up voting more than once, skewing the results. Voting proportional to distribution (and by definition, personal risk taken on) is the only fair way to vote.
I agree, you already see on the burn vote that some people with major amounts voted to burn, 5 votes for giving it to doog and 5 to burn a difference of 21% in tokens.
So if itś based on the amount of tokens, you could burn them already and move on to the next step.
Just my opinion...
Proportional to stake in the currency (see clamour for a similar system) is the only fair way. What about people that have spent real BTC on this currency? If someone didn't risk much to obtain dc, their vote should be weighted accordingly. Also there is no way of telling that someone didn't make a bunch of random addresses / accounts before the drop. Voting on bitcointalk is pointless, because people who don't even have any stake in this currency can vote (same problem).
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | VOTE NOW!
Heh, 5 claimers with 6,538. DC has same voice as 5 with 2,512,788. Wager, there is no fairness there cjmapope?
hee hee
honestly it was just my own opinion that basically rewarding those who have gambled the most was unfair
in the end it's your coin, but in the end it's also my choice to not advocate gambling and/or being rewarded for gambling
i will still support how i can, but only so much as my conscience allows ;p
But i do see that they hold the same weight voting wise, and i do like seeing that
(which was your initial point, but atlas my basic understanding of counterparty voting mislead me ;p)
try not be so wound up, i know it's hard with people not shitting straight rainbows on this idea, but it will be ok ;;
)))To be clear, voting is based on token amounts not number of transactions. If this system was based on number of transactions, someone could send 1 vote token to a million addresses and sabotage the vote.
as of block 401489:
1DARKCLAMxDooGXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZPbYip has 0.05843282% of the vote with 6,538.03037584 tokens.
1DARKCLAMxBURNXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVvbpkg has 22.45772632% of the vote with 2,512,788.27224520 tokens.
Such a system wouldn't be fair given each person could have created as many addresses as they wanted before the drop. So one person could end up voting more than once, skewing the results. Voting proportional to distribution (and by definition, personal risk taken on) is the only fair way to vote.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | VOTE NOW!
Heh, 5 claimers with 6,538. DC has same voice as 5 with 2,512,788. Wager, there is no fairness there cjmapope?
hee hee
honestly it was just my own opinion that basically rewarding those who have gambled the most was unfair
in the end it's your coin, but in the end it's also my choice to not advocate gambling and/or being rewarded for gambling
i will still support how i can, but only so much as my conscience allows ;p
But i do see that they hold the same weight voting wise, and i do like seeing that
(which was your initial point, but atlas my basic understanding of counterparty voting mislead me ;p)
try not be so wound up, i know it's hard with people not shitting straight rainbows on this idea, but it will be ok ;;
)))To be clear, voting is based on token amounts not number of transactions. If this system was based on number of transactions, someone could send 1 vote token to a million addresses and sabotage the vote.
as of block 401489:
1DARKCLAMxDooGXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZPbYip has 0.05843282% of the vote with 6,538.03037584 tokens.
1DARKCLAMxBURNXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVvbpkg has 22.45772632% of the vote with 2,512,788.27224520 tokens.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | DROP SOON.
Well, I guess I'll finally make this information public before more people get sucked into this DarkClam bullshit.
First off, DarkClam is nothing more than an unlocked unlimited XCP asset, Meaning that the developers can essentially create more whenever.
Promises to have an actual crypto done up have been flying around, but not a single member of the darkclam team seems capable of such work.
The OP of this post (andu) deliberately deceived people initially stating DarkClam was not an XCP asset, However later it was found out to be.
I know of more than a few occurrences where JD users have been sucked in by this shit and traded BTC for these essentially worthless unlimited XCP assets...
Now wait a second...
These guys are claiming that this darkclam may have some value in the future all the while being able to create as many coins as they want..
The problem that this creates is that is it impossible to tell exactly how many DarkClam they've created from nothing.. and also how many they may claim to have distributed while stuffing them in their own pockets. Far too many points of trust failure here, and given that andu already has been caught deceiving people initially about what this "coin" really is do you honestly think that he doesn't have a hidden stash or premine set aside?
So OP (andu) already has been caught spreading mis-information about the project from the get go.. And now we are going to trust him to have not filled his own pockets with these limitless assets which are essentially IOU's for some clone coin that they *may* be creating (which, given the design of this "coin" MUST be premined in order to supply the users that claimed the XCP asset with the "actual coin")
Next comes my favourite part, The vote they have going currently for march 16th basically allows you to either vote for them to be "burned" (why would you have to burn anything if no premine as stated in thread title?) or to have them all transferred to JD owner dooglus to further distribute...
I'd like to ask dooglus why he's even risking his trust getting involved with a project that basically from the start was designed to allow the developers to create unlimited amounts of coins with no sure way of telling if they've properly distributed or burned them all. (Again, why do you need to burn coins if their is no premine as stated in thread title?). Personally dooglus if I was you I would stay as far removed from this project as possible. Why create more work for yourself while risking your reputation on something that wasn't properly thought out from the get go.
When it's proven that this was all an elaborate scheme cooked up by the developers to fuck people out of their hard earned BTC you're probably not going to want any involvement at all.
This project as it is laid out currently has far to many points of failure, Taking the developers word that the distribution was done fairly doesn't fucking fly in crypto land and given that OP has already been caught trying to deceive people about the true nature of this project I would highly advise you skip over this scam in the making and not waste your BTC or CLAM supporting a project solely intended to pad the pockets of the developers via embezzled premined assets.. Dark Clam's scam potential is undeniable and andu doesn't want you to know this info.
Don't buy into bullshit dark clam hype. Adding dark to a coins name and making an unlimited XCP asset with the promise to fairly distribute and burn is absolutely fucking absurd considering you claim no premine but the entire idea behind this cannot work without said premine.
TL:DR; Andu lied about what DarkClam was initially, has been trading unlocked XCP assets while promising users they will have value (they won't) all under the promise that it will be fairly distributed (unlikely) all while trying to drag dooglus into it to give this scam in the making credibility.
"Don't worry we'll make sure it's distributed fairly, trust us, we totally didn't make this "coin" so we could embezzle a fair chunk" -Andu's expected response.
P.S. Great idea, terrible execution. If you want your projects to be successful do not allow andu's PR anywhere near it. Any credibility this "coin" may have had is absolutely smashed now given the fact your public relations guy can't even keep his fucking story straight.
First off, DarkClam is nothing more than an unlocked unlimited XCP asset, Meaning that the developers can essentially create more whenever.
Promises to have an actual crypto done up have been flying around, but not a single member of the darkclam team seems capable of such work.
The OP of this post (andu) deliberately deceived people initially stating DarkClam was not an XCP asset, However later it was found out to be.
I know of more than a few occurrences where JD users have been sucked in by this shit and traded BTC for these essentially worthless unlimited XCP assets...
Now wait a second...
These guys are claiming that this darkclam may have some value in the future all the while being able to create as many coins as they want..
The problem that this creates is that is it impossible to tell exactly how many DarkClam they've created from nothing.. and also how many they may claim to have distributed while stuffing them in their own pockets. Far too many points of trust failure here, and given that andu already has been caught deceiving people initially about what this "coin" really is do you honestly think that he doesn't have a hidden stash or premine set aside?
So OP (andu) already has been caught spreading mis-information about the project from the get go.. And now we are going to trust him to have not filled his own pockets with these limitless assets which are essentially IOU's for some clone coin that they *may* be creating (which, given the design of this "coin" MUST be premined in order to supply the users that claimed the XCP asset with the "actual coin")
Next comes my favourite part, The vote they have going currently for march 16th basically allows you to either vote for them to be "burned" (why would you have to burn anything if no premine as stated in thread title?) or to have them all transferred to JD owner dooglus to further distribute...
I'd like to ask dooglus why he's even risking his trust getting involved with a project that basically from the start was designed to allow the developers to create unlimited amounts of coins with no sure way of telling if they've properly distributed or burned them all. (Again, why do you need to burn coins if their is no premine as stated in thread title?). Personally dooglus if I was you I would stay as far removed from this project as possible. Why create more work for yourself while risking your reputation on something that wasn't properly thought out from the get go.
When it's proven that this was all an elaborate scheme cooked up by the developers to fuck people out of their hard earned BTC you're probably not going to want any involvement at all.
This project as it is laid out currently has far to many points of failure, Taking the developers word that the distribution was done fairly doesn't fucking fly in crypto land and given that OP has already been caught trying to deceive people about the true nature of this project I would highly advise you skip over this scam in the making and not waste your BTC or CLAM supporting a project solely intended to pad the pockets of the developers via embezzled premined assets.. Dark Clam's scam potential is undeniable and andu doesn't want you to know this info.
Don't buy into bullshit dark clam hype. Adding dark to a coins name and making an unlimited XCP asset with the promise to fairly distribute and burn is absolutely fucking absurd considering you claim no premine but the entire idea behind this cannot work without said premine.
TL:DR; Andu lied about what DarkClam was initially, has been trading unlocked XCP assets while promising users they will have value (they won't) all under the promise that it will be fairly distributed (unlikely) all while trying to drag dooglus into it to give this scam in the making credibility.
"Don't worry we'll make sure it's distributed fairly, trust us, we totally didn't make this "coin" so we could embezzle a fair chunk" -Andu's expected response.
P.S. Great idea, terrible execution. If you want your projects to be successful do not allow andu's PR anywhere near it. Any credibility this "coin" may have had is absolutely smashed now given the fact your public relations guy can't even keep his fucking story straight.
RIP DARKSCAM
I would burn the remaining darkclam supply right now. But, we also have the option to just give the remaining DC to doog (and control of the coin). So why not let the users decide the fate of this coin?
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | DROP SOON.
sooo questions here.
all remaining darkclams to DOOGLUS and TRANSFER CONTROL of the token to him
how many remaining dcs would be going to dooglus?
and what does transfer control of the token mean exactly?
Don't get me wrong I am all for having doog in our fun project. I think he is honest and a great asset to the coin. But I think a more thorough explanation would help others with their vote. I like to be an informed voter. But congrats on getting doog into dcs. Really nice move. Now if we can get some type of partnership with his dice site we could really grow this project. Congrats
all remaining darkclams to DOOGLUS and TRANSFER CONTROL of the token to him
how many remaining dcs would be going to dooglus?
and what does transfer control of the token mean exactly?
Don't get me wrong I am all for having doog in our fun project. I think he is honest and a great asset to the coin. But I think a more thorough explanation would help others with their vote. I like to be an informed voter. But congrats on getting doog into dcs. Really nice move. Now if we can get some type of partnership with his dice site we could really grow this project. Congrats
13,153,520.94786813 or 54.03522979% will go to dooglas. "Transferring control" of the asset to doog means he can update the token information, create unlimited new tokens, or "lock" the token in to prevent more coins from being created.
I currently control the token (and don't want to), which is why we are holding this vote.
can this be minable after the drop or at the launch or whatever?
darkclam will NEVER be "mineable". However it will be "obtainable" down the road via a fair staking system.Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | DROP SOON.
VOTING IS NOW READY!
Official vote token:
A11025294652163217000
If you want to send all remaining darkclams to DOOGLUS and TRANSFER CONTROL of the token to him (for more distribution), send your vote tokens here:
1DARKCLAMxDooGXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZPbYip
If you want to BURN all remaining darkclams and lock the token so NO MORE CAN BE CREATED, send your vote tokens here:
1DARKCLAMxBURNXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVvbpkg
MAJORITY WINS, VOTING ENDS MARCH16.
Official vote token:
A11025294652163217000
If you want to send all remaining darkclams to DOOGLUS and TRANSFER CONTROL of the token to him (for more distribution), send your vote tokens here:
1DARKCLAMxDooGXXXXXXXXXXXXXXZPbYip
If you want to BURN all remaining darkclams and lock the token so NO MORE CAN BE CREATED, send your vote tokens here:
1DARKCLAMxBURNXXXXXXXXXXXXXXVvbpkg
MAJORITY WINS, VOTING ENDS MARCH16.
Re: [ANN] [DC] Dark Clam | NO ICO | NO PREMINE | POBS | J-D wager | DROP SOON.
zazarb, address can't be wrong cus I just sign up for counterwallet and got it from there.
As it gos for msg back I don't remember if I did. Could be I didn't could be I did.
just check or you sign in "right " counterwallet(first time I sign in testnet counerwallet and also not got confirmation from bot) As it gos for msg back I don't remember if I did. Could be I didn't could be I did.
In top of My Account Balance is written:
"How to Buy XCP Provided that it is legal in your jurisdiction, the easiest way to buy XCP is from one of the centralized exchanges listed here."
So I assume its right place.
Well anyhow on 24'th I asked andu (clamdu) in JD chat is my registration ok. He told me to type !dc on chat and if I get respond I'm OK.
I did type !dc on chat and got bot respond with amount of coins written in bold text.
Can't explain better then that.
You missed it, unless the votes say that distribution will continue you wont be able to claim. Sorry.
Well I don't know what els I can say or do. You could have take care it before when we chat in JD MSG's few days ago and fix it like you told you gonna do. It's obvious you don't wanna do it nor care. Pope could svear I made on time with claim but I don't think it would matter.
I don't know what or where got screwd up.
May be this couple of lines can share light on it?
21:44:20 (51) My dealer always ALWAYS comes lste
21:44:37 (51) Atleast he speaks spanish and lends the weed to me lol.
P.S Sorry to be bit harsh with this post. Readers discretion is advised.
the bumps are nice, but shit man if it will stop your bitchiing ill give you some DC. ;P
tbh, currently they are worthless so idk what the butthurt so on about ;\
buy some on the market
its like u lost a dat file with 100btc in it haha shit
zazarb, address can't be wrong cus I just sign up for counterwallet and got it from there.
As it gos for msg back I don't remember if I did. Could be I didn't could be I did.
just check or you sign in "right " counterwallet(first time I sign in testnet counerwallet and also not got confirmation from bot) As it gos for msg back I don't remember if I did. Could be I didn't could be I did.
In top of My Account Balance is written:
"How to Buy XCP Provided that it is legal in your jurisdiction, the easiest way to buy XCP is from one of the centralized exchanges listed here."
So I assume its right place.
Well anyhow on 24'th I asked andu (clamdu) in JD chat is my registration ok. He told me to type !dc on chat and if I get respond I'm OK.
I did type !dc on chat and got bot respond with amount of coins written in bold text.
Can't explain better then that.
You missed it, unless the votes say that distribution will continue you wont be able to claim. Sorry.
Well I don't know what els I can say or do. You could have take care it before when we chat in JD MSG's few days ago and fix it like you told you gonna do. It's obvious you don't wanna do it nor care. Pope could svear I made on time with claim but I don't think it would matter.
I don't know what or where got screwd up.
May be this couple of lines can share light on it?
21:44:20 (51) My dealer always ALWAYS comes lste
21:44:37 (51) Atleast he speaks spanish and lends the weed to me lol.
P.S Sorry to be bit harsh with this post. Readers discretion is advised.
I don't generally have problem with it I'm all for libertys but if you regret your things and I'm in other side then I might have.
Do joint or what ever you do it's between your self, your doctor and law enforcement agencies.
Here is a log in of PM's without any alteration so don't give any more BS I didn't make on time or whatever and tell I'm hm-hmm lying in forum.
----
2016-02-23 14:53:22 [ (1213144) → (51) ] !darkclam
2016-02-23 14:53:22 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 1) type /public; create a wallet https://counterwallet.io/; then /msg 51 [ADDY]
2016-02-23 14:53:25 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 1) type /public; create a wallet https://counterwallet.io/; then /msg 51 [ADDY]
2016-02-23 14:53:28 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 1) type /public; create a wallet https://counterwallet.io/; then /msg 51 [ADDY]
2016-02-23 14:53:31 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 1) type /public; create a wallet https://counterwallet.io/; then /msg 51 [ADDY]
2016-02-23 15:03:47 [ (1213144) → (51) ] [16M5y64zQ5yticJgH318c85W9YA28G2u5g]
2016-02-24 20:04:10 [ (1213144) → (51) ] (1213144) !dc 1213144; unclaimed = 4902.653603 !darkclam
2016-02-24 20:04:46 [ (1213144) → (51) ] unclaimed = 4902.653603
2016-02-26 15:39:13 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 1 week is too long
2016-02-26 15:39:18 [ (1213144) → (51) ] ok lets do it private
2016-02-26 15:39:20 [ (51) → (1213144) ] ot had to be there aftwr 24h
2016-02-26 15:39:31 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you probably claimed wrong... we need to look into it
2016-02-26 15:39:40 [ (51) → (1213144) ] how moch you had/have?
2016-02-26 15:40:38 [ (1213144) → (51) ] yesterday when it give me bold text when I put !dc in was 4900+somethig
2016-02-26 15:40:59 [ (51) → (1213144) ] then its all good
2016-02-26 15:41:07 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you should have testcoins in XCP
2016-02-26 15:41:13 [ (51) → (1213144) ] do not trade them
2016-02-26 15:41:15 [ (1213144) → (51) ] 4903 or 4906 something like that
2016-02-26 15:41:26 [ (51) → (1213144) ] unless you went /private
2016-02-26 15:41:29 [ (51) → (1213144) ] let me check
2016-02-26 15:41:32 [ (1213144) → (51) ] thats the thing I don't
2016-02-26 15:41:49 [ (51) → (1213144) ] 5036 you should have
2016-02-26 15:41:56 [ (51) → (1213144) ] if yday was showing that then it should be good
2016-02-26 15:42:42 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you not in the list
2016-02-26 15:43:25 [ (51) → (1213144) ] ill speak with daxx
2016-02-26 15:43:33 [ (51) → (1213144) ] worst case scenario we manually add you we dhall see
2016-02-26 15:43:37 [ (1213144) → (51) ] ok thanks
2016-02-26 15:43:46 [ (51) → (1213144) ] but ill just guess you didnt claimed well.
2016-02-26 15:44:00 [ (51) → (1213144) ] i mean i had this worry many times
2016-02-26 15:44:18 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I did exactly what instruction told
2016-02-26 15:44:21 [ (51) → (1213144) ] and it all resulted in people doing it wrong, yet if you were gettung the messsge then :/
2016-02-26 15:44:37 [ (51) → (1213144) ] when you were pming me your address did it said pending?
2016-02-26 15:44:47 [ (1213144) → (51) ] no
2016-02-26 15:45:05 [ (51) → (1213144) ] then you didnt claimed
2016-02-26 15:45:08 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you are public
2016-02-26 15:45:10 [ (1213144) → (51) ] but not 100% sure
2016-02-26 15:45:20 [ (51) → (1213144) ] did you do /msg 51 ADDRESS?
2016-02-26 15:45:25 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I don't remember
2016-02-26 15:45:26 [ (51) → (1213144) ] countetparty.io address
2016-02-26 15:45:31 [ (1213144) → (51) ] yes
2016-02-26 15:46:04 [ (51) → (1213144) ] have you done /private after the /public?
2016-02-26 15:46:11 [ (1213144) → (51) ] right after I made addy
2016-02-26 15:46:24 [ (1213144) → (51) ] no I have not
2016-02-26 15:47:03 [ (51) → (1213144) ] just in case ill say that first you had to be public then write address but eitherway ill get you done today
2016-02-26 15:48:05 [ (1213144) → (51) ] yes I made it public as first step
2016-02-26 15:50:00 [ (1213144) → (51) ] ok thanks
2016-02-26 19:17:01 [ (1213144) → (51) ] Do you also need me give you my dc addy here again or you find my original msg?
2016-02-27 14:32:41 [ (1213144) → (51) ] hey, I forgot to ask did you dot my DC address?
2016-02-27 14:32:57 [ (51) → (1213144) ] hmm`?
2016-02-27 14:33:44 [ (1213144) → (51) ] *got
2016-02-27 14:34:37 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I have been thinking what may be gone wrong and only 1 thing I can think up
2016-02-27 14:34:53 [ (51) → (1213144) ] i dont have your dc address
2016-02-27 14:35:03 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you probably missed it or nailed the bot down.
2016-02-27 14:35:22 [ (1213144) → (51) ] no I did in on time I'm sure of it
2016-02-27 14:35:57 [ (1213144) → (51) ] last step was in claiming send msg to you with wallet addy
2016-02-27 14:36:10 [ (51) → (1213144) ] i mean there was few hours that the bot was down, you got an message back when you sent me the addy?
2016-02-27 14:37:13 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I don't remeber that if I got message back but I don't think I did
2016-02-27 14:38:12 [ (1213144) → (51) ] could be I sent it when bot was down
2016-02-27 14:38:47 [ (1213144) → (51) ] or when I sent you addy I put it as was in instruction
2016-02-27 14:39:18 [ (1213144) → (51) ] [16M5y64zQ5yticJgH318c85W9YA28G2u5g]
2016-02-27 14:39:46 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I had address in []
2016-02-27 14:40:52 [ (1213144) → (51) ] the addy was in parenthesis
2016-02-28 18:17:31 [ (1213144) → (51) ] hey, was there a drop of DC?
2016-02-28 21:12:51 [ (1213144) → (51) ] hey was there a DC drop?
2016-02-28 21:14:33 [ (51) → (1213144) ] yes
2016-02-28 21:15:10 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I see I hope you didn't forget about me
2016-02-28 21:15:36 [ (1213144) → (51) ] you told you gonna take care of this
2016-02-28 21:16:03 [ (51) → (1213144) ] you.done.somerhing wrong and you were lying, there.is not much i can do.
2016-02-28 21:16:30 [ (1213144) → (51) ] me lying???
2016-02-28 21:16:41 [ (51) → (1213144) ] in the thread
2016-02-28 21:16:49 [ (1213144) → (51) ] no I haven't told a word that isn't true
2016-02-28 21:17:05 [ (1213144) → (51) ] what I lied about?
2016-02-28 21:17:15 [ (51) → (1213144) ] go resd
2016-02-28 21:17:18 [ (51) → (1213144) ] read
2016-02-28 21:18:33 [ (1213144) → (51) ] my first post was February 23, 2016, 03:12:03 PM Telling I joined darj side
2016-02-28 21:19:04 [ (1213144) → (51) ] after I did all steps
2016-02-28 21:20:36 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I did
2016-02-28 21:20:56 [ (1213144) → (51) ] last one was sent PM to you with wallet addy
2016-02-28 21:22:48 [ (1213144) → (51) ] I don't know how I can proof it but I did
END
-----
Ps: remember that you had to write the address only without parenthesis.
Well thats explains whay you didn't get it. I didn't know address only. I did like instruction said [addy] and I put my address between parenthesis and PM'd it to you.
I did got bit carried away cus you told I lied. I followed instructions to the dot. Well parenthesis on this case. LOL
Chill out and smoke some weed guys :p