Search content
Sort by

Showing 19 of 19 results by decipher11
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 27/03/2020, 11:29:14 UTC

Quote
Bullshit excuse. What kind of forecast is that - eventually.
Well then you are an idiot also if you think that can be predicted to a specific target date.  

Over45, Martin, fabricated lies as usual, the most interesting thing about Armstrong was his pretended ability using Socraps to predict the future ... period

To support his claim you have to learn to read the infamous ECM and more infamous forecast Arrays.

Over45 have you ever see a forecast array ?




 
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 27/03/2020, 05:14:17 UTC
For people thinking if they should go to any WEC ...

Since MA can not legally give any financial advise - plain fact that he takes care to hide to the plebe, you won't get any advise to manage your money. Reading the free blog is much more interesting than attend his WEC
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 27/03/2020, 05:10:02 UTC
Quote
So basically you're saying if something does happen then he right, but nothing happens then he's not wrong?

Is that what your comprehension is of the ECM statement I just posted?  Seems pretty clear to me what the ECM is -- and isn't.

Martin Armstrong self forged lies

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/the-real-implications-of-forecasting-more-profound-than-you-think/


REPLY: The fact that we can forecast any event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 27/03/2020, 05:08:33 UTC

Blog/Basic Concepts
Posted Feb 10, 2016 by Martin Armstrong

BUY-SELL

COMMENT: Mr. Armstrong, I attended the Berlin Conference and I must say, you told us to expect a move between the Benchmarks in gold, and that the first quarter looked to be a countertrend move. You seem to be able to map out the direction of markets all the time. I am still working out the best way to read the arrays. But I have to ask. Why have you not been given the Noble Prize with such a long track record that is unbeatable?



I was at this WEC, and have evidence of what has been said by MA.

He never said such thing ! It's fabricated answer afterward to make the promotion of the next WEC
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 27/03/2020, 05:05:45 UTC
Martin Armstrong self forged lies

https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/basic-concepts/the-real-implications-of-forecasting-more-profound-than-you-think/


REPLY: The fact that we can forecast any event to the day PROVES that markets are by no means RANDOM.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 20/03/2020, 11:21:35 UTC
If you think Armstrong public blog and his opinion is trading advice you are a complete fool.

Same for Armstrong Private Blog and SOCRAPS since it's purpose is Educational Only not to use for trading. Read carefully the Disclaimer.[/b]

Facing the timing Array You will feel like facing a fake nuclear plan control panel, with colorful lights, gauge, and no one to explain it to you not even it's own creator. He can not explain it because it means nothing. And he can use it any time and say right on target, no one is able to understand it.

As I said previously, I attended a WEC and when came the time, by the end, to explain the mysterious Array, Martin Armstrong left the Stage. For more than a year in the WEC Blog we shared our experience trying to use the Array, even one attendee at some point offered 10000$ for a usable explanation without any success !!!!

This is the best smokescreen have ever seen to trick people. I guess we are all attracted by colorful stuff.

Well done Martin you are same as the one you constantly bash : career Politician, your are a Master, a Master liar.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 20/03/2020, 10:57:32 UTC
As a reminder, no need to buy Socrates subscription to get the infamous numbers, no need for super computer, simple math.

This is the methodology to create easily reversals for any time frame


Every time the market exceeds the previous close high or low, a set of reversals is generated.

There are 4 prices in a set of reversals.

These are determined from the timings 3, 5, 13, 26 for stocks, for the Dow he seems to be using 3, 5, 13, 26.

If a new high is made :
• the low from the previous 3rd session is a bearish reversal,
• the low from the previous 5th session is another bearish reversal,
• the low from the previous 13th session is another bearish reversal,
• and the low from the previous 26th session is another bearish reversal.

If a new low is made :
• the high from the previous 3rd session is a bullish reversal,
• the high from the previous 5th session is another bullish reversal,
• the high from the previous 13th session is another bullish reversal,
• and the high from the previous 26th session is another bullish reversal.

If there is a holiday and the markets were closed, that still counts as a day.

Once a close is above a bullish reversal, it is elected, and when the close is bellow a bearish reversal, it is elected.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 26/02/2020, 12:20:49 UTC
For those interested a pinescript to use in tradingview calculating reversals multi-complex system  Grin

written in 10 min, can be improved with elected reversal not being displayed anymore

//@version=2
//decipher11

study("[RS]Reversal", overlay=true)


Mod = input(true, title="box checked : 3-5-13-23 Reversal (Commodities and Dow) - unchecked 4,8,16,26 Reversals (Ind Stocks)")

r1 = Mod ? 3 : 4
r2 = Mod ? 5 : 8
r3 = Mod ? 13 : 16
r4 = Mod ? 23 : 26

topl1 =  valuewhen ( high >= highest(high,13), low[r1],0)
toph1 = valuewhen ( low <= lowest(low,13), high[r1], 0)
topl12 = valuewhen (high >=highest(high,13), low[r2], 0)
toph12 = valuewhen (low <= lowest(low,13), high[r2], 0)
topl13 = valuewhen (high >=highest(high,13), low[r3], 0)
toph13 = valuewhen (low <= lowest(low,13), high[r3], 0)
topl14 = valuewhen (high >=highest(high,13), low[r4], 0)
toph14 = valuewhen (low <= lowest(low,13), high[r4], 0)



tl1 = plot(topl1, color =topl1 != topl1[100] ? na : red, linewidth=2, style=linebr, offset=0)
th1 = plot(toph1, color =toph1 != toph1[100] ? na : green, linewidth=2, style=line, offset=0)

tl12 = plot(topl12, color =topl12 != topl12[1] ? na : red, linewidth=2, style=linebr, offset=0)
th12 = plot(toph12, color =toph12 != toph12[1] ? na : green, linewidth=2, style=line, offset=0)

tl13 = plot(topl13, color =topl13 != topl13[1] ? na : red, linewidth=2, style=linebr, offset=0)
th13 = plot(toph13, color =toph13 != toph13[1] ? na : green, linewidth=2, style=line, offset=0)

tl14 = plot(topl14, color =topl14 != topl14[1] ? na : red, linewidth=2, style=linebr, offset=0)
th14 = plot(toph14, color =toph14 != toph14[1] ? na : green, linewidth=2, style=line, offset=0)

//


hey Marty, can you imagine, if I had an hour to lose I would have been able to rewrite SOCRAPS !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 26/02/2020, 11:53:57 UTC
still waiting for that chart decipher 11 actually fitting name cos he talks in riddles investing is easy guys its just nth to nth to the nth. claim you have worked out his system show no proof lol

nth to the nth nth

Unlike you Martin I don't spend my day behind a computer trolling and spamming forums, and hunting for fools to get their money.

Since you are still waiting, .... You should spend that time ... to educate yourself, as you did in jail, learn about reading, understanding, and reasoning, obviously your are missing all those basics, 11 years was not enough.

May be this is exactly what you are looking for, go back to jail meeting with your friends, ... and you might achieve this sooner that you think. With what you are regularly posting on your "blog"  - gold graph with buy/sell signal, which is far beyond educational purpose, you are intentionally misleading people into thinking SOCRAPS is trading tools for them to use ! Since, by court order you are bare from advising anyone anymore, you should be sue for this ! "lol"

About your reversal system, my point was for people to know that what you pretend to be "based entirely upon physics with very complex formulas"
https://www.armstrongeconomics.com/armstrongeconomics101/training-tools/reversal-v-technical-analysis/
is a very simple formula using fix numbers that anyone else equipped with a 6 years old brain can understand and replicate.

About their validity - reversals - there is countless testimony here on how useless they are !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 25/02/2020, 00:00:33 UTC
wow 360 pages of hate anybody with a brain can see these people are paid

360 pages of questions / answers / proofs

And here just pops up WHATEVERBABY2 crying for MA being hated ?!?!?

Martin your are the one being paid to earn money on the back of your subscribers selling them BS.

You are the only one here insulting others ... your basic tactic when the king appears as he is .... naked !

I do know you, I do know your products : Socrates SOCRAPS, your reports (100 of pages with historical studies and the last 5 pages with only obfuscated comment about the future), your Conferences where nothing can be learned, just the same stories that anyone can read for free in the blog !

You are the king of liars ! ready to steal money from small people to quench your thirst for revenge and past fame !


Martin Armstrong preferred quote

“I know you think you understand what you thought I said but I'm not sure you realize that what you heard is not what I meant” A. Greenspan

Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 24/02/2020, 23:32:26 UTC
decipher 11 maybe you could give me an example of what you mean via a chart. as a trader to me a tick is the smallest possible timeframe so im unclear what you mean put up a chart as an example. your in danger of making an interesting statement which is rare in this forum

Sure Martin I can explain in Details how reversals are generated,

Since your system generates previsions after a market has close, to be clear a tick is the close of a timeframe

yearly reversals are generated using nth previous yearly close,
quarterly reversals are generated using nth previous quarter close,
monthly reversals are generated using nth previous months close

..... let me know if you need more details on any other time frame Martin !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 24/02/2020, 14:54:07 UTC
REVERSAL

You don't need supercomputer to replicate Martin Armstrong Reversal system :

This is how REVERSAL are calculated - this can be done with pinescript in 15 min


"There are 4 prices in a set of reversals.

These are determined from the timings 3, 5, 13, 26. (for stocks he seems to use 4, 8, 16, 23, however for the Dow he seems to be using 3, 5, 13, 26).

So if a new high is made :
- the low from the previous 3rd tick is a bearish reversal,
- the low from the previous 5th tick is another bearish reversal,
- the low from the previous 13th tick is another bearish reversal,
- and the low from the previous 26th tick is another bearish reversal.
 
The same is true if a new low is made, in this case the previous nth high is used."
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 24/02/2020, 14:39:27 UTC
wow 360 pages of hate anybody with a brain can see these people are paid

360 pages of questions / answers / proofs

And here just pops up WHATEVERBABY2 crying for MA being hated ?!?!?

Martin your are the one being paid to earn money on the back of your subscribers selling them BS.

You are the only one here insulting others ... your basic tactic when the king appears as he is .... naked !

I do know you, I do know your products : Socrates SOCRAPS, your reports (100 of pages with historical studies and the last 5 pages with only obfuscated comment about the future), your Conferences where nothing can be learned, just the same stories that anyone can read for free in the blog !

You are the king of liars ! ready to steal money from small people to quench your thirst for revenge and past fame !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 24/02/2020, 14:20:21 UTC

https://d33wjekvz3zs1a.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2020/02/GCNYNF-D-trading-2-22-2020.jpg

Socrates has been buying gold on the rally for the numbers are the numbers.


Of course, these trades were never posted in real-time...
But now in hindsight, he's nailing it. Can't lose a single trade.

So we're just gonna have to trust him on that one. Or that bad trades are not hidden from that chart.

Reminder

I did have access to Socrates, and believe me you will never find any graph like this one with buy and sell signal.

Martin Armstrong is again totally misleading his readers pretending his system can be use for trading with buy/sell signals.
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 31/12/2019, 03:25:31 UTC
Since MA is trolling this blog to try to bury any information demonstrating that Socrates is a fraud and the product of his megalomania !

This is how reversals are created - far from quantum physic as stated by Martin Armstrong - since just human intelligence can generate them quite easily


Every time the market exceeds the previous tick's high or low, a set of reversals is generated. If that new high or low is not exceeded for the next tick, that reversal stays.

There are 4 prices in a set of reversals.

These are determined from the timings 3, 5, 13, 26. (for stocks he seems to use 4, 8, 16, 23, however for the Dow he seems to be using 3, 5, 13, 26).

So if a new high is made, the low from the previous 3rd tick is a bearish reversal, the low from the previous 5th tick is another bearish reversal, the low from the previous 13th tick is another bearish reversal, and the low from the previous 26th tick is another bearish reversal.

The same is true if a new low is made, in this case the previous nth high is used.
If there is a holiday and the markets were closed, that still counts as a day.

You can generate reversals yourself at all levels of time.


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


MA constantly says that the plebe (useful idiot) doesn't connect the dot as his system does, meaning no market move alone, everything is correlated.

Which is a cleaver observation.

BUT using Socrates you will never find any correlation, all markets are "analyzed" separately from each other .... not dot connection, no correlation

Socrates is everything except Artificial Intelligence !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Merits 1 from 1 user
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 29/12/2019, 05:30:54 UTC
⭐ Merited by AnonymousCoder (1)
For people still living in the cult, Something else worth considering before subscribing to Socrates ...


MA constantly says that the plebe (useful idiot) doesn't connect the dot as his system does, meaning no market move alone, everything is correlated.

Which is a cleaver observation.

BUT using Socrates you will never find any correlation, all markets are "analyzed" separately from each other .... not dot connection, no correlation

Socrates is everything except Artificial Intelligence !

Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 11/12/2019, 13:47:03 UTC
sometime reversal work, sometime it doesn't.
Most of the time they are irrelevant.
On my experience all Socrates information are useless especially Socrates reports which are totally unusable for trading. Reading those reports make you completely confuse and unable to enter any trade. Socrates is everything except AI as claimed by its seller. No buy signal/or sell signal nor direction. Buy/sell signal always appeared, miraculously, afterwards in MA blog 

Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 11/12/2019, 04:53:09 UTC
As a WEC attendee i witnessed that MA is unable to give any clue how to use his famous array that are supposedly predicting everything.

After a day of empty speech and common knowledge, repeating the same stuff anyone can read in his blog, time came to present his Array ....
at this time MA went off stage !!!! to be replaced by another guy who for 20" pretended giving insight on how to read it.

Can you imagine that .... the creator of the "perfect" predicting tool hiding behind someone else to give a quick glimpse of is major achievement !!!

We talk for more than a year trying to read the array ... no one ... no one get into it !! those array are total BS

It is just the perfect tool to trick people and for him to show up afterward and tell you "right on time"

And if you dare question him, you will get insulted directly in his blog without any possibility to respond.

Martin Armstrong is a Master of lie !
Post
Topic
Board Economics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
decipher11
on 11/12/2019, 03:40:22 UTC
According to MA reversals are generated using advance AI.

Well ... just human intelligence can generate them quite easily

Reversals methodology deciphered by Arthur another deceived Princeton Attendees in April 2016

"I'm interested in discussing how the reversals are generated. I'll start with what I have
observed. It's better to use the actual numbers from the charts provided Socrates, that way it's
much more precise.

Every time the market exceeds the previous tick's high or low, a set of reversals is generated. If
that new high or low is not exceeded for the next tick, that reversal stays. I think this is what MA
is referring to when he talks about the "What-If" models.

There are 4 prices in a set of reversals.

These are determined from the timings 3, 5, 13, 26. (for stocks he seems to use 4, 8, 16, 23, however for the Dow he seems to be using 3, 5, 13, 26).

So if a new high is made, the low from the previous 3rd tick is a bearish reversal, the low from the
previous 5th tick is another bearish reversal, the low from the previous 13th tick is another
bearish reversal, and the low from the previous 26th tick is another bearish reversal. The same is
true if a new low is made, in this case the previous nth high is used.
If there is a holiday and the markets were closed, that still counts as a day.

For example, looking at the NY Gold Nearest Futures on the daily level, from the 128780 high on
March 11, the reaction low so far was 120600 on March 28. The 4 reversals generated were:
123530 (26, high from Feb 19)
124980 (3, high from Mar 23)
125670 (5, high from Mar 21)
126570 (13, high from Mar 9)

MA talks about how 1266 is the key bullish reversal, perhaps it is because it is the 4th reversal
from the reaction low, once all 4 of those reversals are taken out, the market moves to the next
level of trading.

Another example with the NY Gold Nearest Futures on the quarterly level, the low in Q4 2015
was 104540. MA wrote that this generated a minor quarterly bullish reversal at 993, while at the
same time we elected a bearish reversal at 1112. Here are the set of 4 reversals from that low:
99210 (26, high from Q2 2009)
130780 (3, high from Q1 2015)
134680 (5, high from Q3 2014)
179000 (13, high from Q3 2012)
So the 993 reversal seem to be more precisely 99210. Sometimes the reversal that is generated is
already below or above the market, like in this case.

You can generate reversals at all levels of time. Sometimes the market will bounce off a reversal,
sometimes the market will blast through a whole cluster of reversals."

Thanks to him for debunking the Socrates fraud