Qureno Block Explorer
https://explorer.qureno.com

QRN listed on bitsails
https://www.bitsails.com/market?MarketName=BTC-QRN

Qureno Poker
Soon in all monitors of the world!
https://i.ibb.co/zGsYkqn/4e73d870b7.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/McbhNqf/19f71c7cfc.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/PmJDNRV/a1eef9ef69.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/hgpSGxF/cb10d86f21.jpg


Wallet:
https://github.com/Qureno-project/Qureno/releases/download/v0.1.3.0/Qureno-wallet.zip


NO PREMINE!!!

The minimum issue of coins is 20,000 for the launch of the first masternodes that ensure the launch of the network.

Qureno - An honest cryptocurrency that will be developed by the community!

All wallets will be laid out one day before the start, and the start of accepting blocks will be started at a certain time and date.

Decentralized funding system of the projects
The Qureno block reward allocates 10% into a community-governed "Fund for Financing of Projects".
This fund is fully open to audit by the public, providing assurance of the fund’s intended use.
Any owner of the masternode of Qureno platform will be able to put their projects for voting, in order to get financing through the Qureno platform.
This can be either proposals of improving the platform, or their own projects that can cause interest in the community and get the necessary number of votes.
 
Reward system
Proof-of-Work, Proof-of-Stake and Masternodes are all ways that various cryptocurrencies reward workers.
These reward systems contribute to the creation and confirmation of the Blockchain and each new block distributes the reward among those who perform jobs.
Our team has developed a new formula of reward distribution. Currently the reward for the mined block will be dynamic and paid with an accuracy of eight decimal places.

The reward will be calculated according to the following formula:
Reward = (19.500009 - (0.000009 * nPrevHeight));

The reward will smoothly decrease from 21 to 2 coins per block during nine years. Then it will remain 2 coins per block until the end of the issue.

The Qureno block reward is split such that 72% of rewards are allocated to masternodes, 18% of rewards are allocated to miners and 10% are allocated to a community-governed "Fund for Financing of Projects".
Qureno includes a unique lucky block system called Lucky Proof-of-Work. This system rewards both miners and masternodes owners who find a specific block, introducing an element of luck and excitement to the Qureno community.
 
Reward calculation for masternodes
The Qureno code base dictates that masternode rewards fluctuate based on the current number of masternodes.

To calculate daily masternode payouts, one can use the following formula:
Reward MN (per day) = ( n / t ) * r * b * 0.72
n = number of masternodes owned
t = total active masternodes
r = current block reward
b = blocks per day

Qureno specifications
Ticker: QRN
Max Coin Supply: 25,000,000 QRN
Algorithm: X33 / PoW+Masternode
Block Reward: Smoothly decrease rewards from 19 to 2 coins per block, for 9 years.

Block Reward Distribution
Masternodes: 72%
Miners: 18%
Governance and funding: 10%

P2P Port: 9799
Difficulty Algorithm: Dark Gravity Wave 3.0
Block Size: 2 MB
Block Time: 120 sec.
Masternode Confirmation: 15 blocks
Masternode Collateral: 10000 QRN
Governance Fee: 5 QRN
Governance Minimum Quorum: 10 votes
Premine: 0 QRN

The unique mining algorithm will only be available through the wallet.

=================

UPDATE:
We implemented 17 unique algorithms inside the blockchain.
The kernel will choose which algorithm to use for the future block.
Random selection of one of the unique algorithms: x33, x34, x35, x36, x37, x38, x39, x40, x41, x42, x43, x44, x45, x46, x47, x48, x49

=================

I told you what has been told in this 3d nearly 2-3 weeks ago as a comment on your youtube channel where you answered that you're gonna check it out for yourself :-)
Didn't get an answer btw, however, where you able to sort this problem out on your A10 (which you reviewed)?

It looks like your experience is worse than mine... good to know, btw, that I'm not the only complaining about them.

Let me explain this furthermore:

This is not a poolside problem. This is a firmware related problem. If you take a gpu-rig and set claymore as your miner you have the variable of choosing your wallet number and when checking the webstats you do it using your wallet.
This is not possible with the A10. They don’t allow you to mine based on a wallet number. You MUST set a username (not a walletnumber). That means that you MUST mine based on the few pools that allow registering on their website where they give you the username based on your walletnumber.

I’ll take this to give you also a few updates:

1.) I was in huge disadvantage using F2Pool because of high rejected shares... but that sorted itself out with their newest european pool. I need to say that their customer service (on telegram) was great. I didn’t expect them to help me as much as they did. Kudos to them!

2.) No, i’m not talking about solo-mining as I am greatly far away from having enough hashing power that would give me the reason to go solo-mining. Would love to have that power btw

3.) I wrote at least another dozen mails to Innosilicon technical department and they are NOT helping at all regarding this matter. The only answer I am constantly getting is “they are apologizing” and they do not have a solution for the moment. I am pretty sure they will never release a firmware update. They just don’t give a shit about it. Innosilicon does not have a solution to that? That is a fucking joke, that is simply ridicolous.

I’m mining now using F2Pool but i will never ever anymore buy anything from Innosilicon. They are a shady company with a nonexistent customer care and i warmly suggest you to do your research before buying anything from them.

Never heard of that pool. I'ts a good start as an alternative. Thank you. What really would be good is a firmware Update from Innosilicon. 


Never heard of any alternative firmware to load up. I did my research on Google and there's nothing, no 3d's talking about anything less than the simple presentation of tha miner. Until now it's not popular at all.

So.. finally I've decided to buy 2 of those A10 Ethmaster which should make 485MH/s consuming only 750Watts @wall.
Stats are that both of them are using 910 Watts each on efficiency++ mode (which is the one that should consume less) and in fact they mine with an average of 450-460 MH/s. So far.. so good. No problem with that.

What is making me freaking angry is following:

There is no goddamn way to mine using a wallet or mining address as your worker. Yes, exactly, you got it. That's freaking stupid! That restricts you from using any pool (like ethermine.. nanopool.... etc. etc..) and so far.. the only pool where I was able to mine is F2POOL where you have to register to their website and they give a username, which is then related to your wallet registered on the website when you login. That's freaking username mining and not wallet based mining.  Very useful for US.. or EUROPEAN miners that have to live with a good 5-10% rejected shares due to very high pings. You know.. china is geographically far away and i'm forced to use F2POOl since that's the only pool which I am able to connect. And yeah... there's also the 2,5% fee to the pool! (I mean.. that's still 1,5% more than ethermine or nanopool!!).

WTF!?!?! Really, was it so difficult to specify on the website that there's no wallet mining?!
BTW, after several mails to Innosilicon asking for a quick firmware update they gained some time by writing.. "I checked with our engineers but sorry to get back with no positive response. Apologize for the inconvenience."
That's all. No solution available.

So, all in all, don't buy it until this issue is considered history.

P.S: Anyone who wants to see facts.. no worry. I can post screenshots.
P.P.S: Anyone who's in my same situation.. start making some pressure on Innosilicon.. maybe there will be a firmware update to solve this matter.
P.P.P.S: Made several edits.. i was actually too nervous to write it down correctly.

Did it... i'm hovering between 108 - 112 watts per gpu. (Hashrate 31.3Mh/s) I'f i try to go under 0.881v it simply makes no changes. (even if, for example, i'll try to set 780mV, it makes no real difference).

Checked it on hwinfo64... you were right. it says 1.131v. So, how do i lower that on bios? There should be something i did completely wrong...

Any ideas?

Undervolt made with SRBeditor.

Mem Controller:

300   @ 875mV
1000 @ 875mV
2100 @ 875mV

What could be wrong?

Tried undervolting up to 875mv. On that value i got -10 watts @ wall. Not much... 

Thank you for your reply.

I will try to undervolt it by SRBeditor to 900mv. (Shouldn't be that much..) and let you know the readings on the wall.

my strap:

999000000000000022559D0010DE5B44A0551312B74C450A00400600750414206A8900A00200312 011112E36A42A3816

I've left voltage stock on bios. (means 1000mv on SRBeditor).
never used cvddc/mvddc on claymore , as i thought that reducing power consumption can be made by bios modifications.

Thank you for your specification.

At the moment with my RX570 sapphire nitro+ on hynix memory I'm reaching following hashrates:

1200 - 2150 Oscillating between 31.8 - 32.2. But with a power consumption that is far too high. (165 watts on wall).
1150 - 2050 Oscillating between 30.3 - 30.7. But with a power consumption that is still too high. (135 watts on wall).

I've talked to someone who shared a video proofing that on the same card with the same memory in a 6x rig he's making 31,3 stable for weeks and months with a consumption of 100-103watts per card. I'm hardly trying to reach that level.. but'm still far away.

Any hints on how to solve this?

Thank you in advance!

I'm reading into this for a while and wanna give to all the experts here big kudos for the huge amount of data that this thread produced. Thank you!

It took me a while to read through the 60 pages and lots of effort and even more trial and error to get some decent hashrate with the strap editor on SRB Editor. (btw, never used Excel so much ... to compare and edit the decoded straps).

My small but important request is:

I wanna find the sweetspot between power consumption and hashrate on, for example on one of the sapphire rx 570 4gb (hynix), but although I read (as far as I can.. there are many points that i do not understand.. on GDDR5 datasheets found through google) the decoded straps, i don't get it where to reduce significantly the power usage. (Sometimes it's quite frustrating )  Is it the strap in its complexity that makes the power usage or is it one specific point that makes the difference?

Thank you in advance!