Stop panicking, stupid moronic sellers.......... Delisted from a shit exchange is not a big deal! We have Zapple now, which seem to have great growth potential and have a great dude who is actually hearing our voices! XpoolX is working on his one! You will regret selling at less than 500 sat!!

Difficulty hardly crashed with the bad news, so there is still as many miners and people supporting the project. Time to earn an easy 10 x return by buying RIC now at these outrageously low prices and hold them patiently before it returns to the already scandalous 500 sat level. RIC market cap must at least match XPM's.

Some people might already doubled their fortune by buying RIC at 71 sat... Who knows if it was just a dump & pumper...

Guytp, can you contact cryptoid and CoinMarketCap so they add your exchange?

@guytp - when I click on "2" to see the next page of buy orders for RIC on your exchange, ... nothing happens.

I may be holding it wrong, I admit.

(can't page through the sell orders either).

Chrome, MacOS, nothing else weird.

Kudos for the continued improvements to your exchange!

Hi all. I've been mining Riecoin since January. It is good to see some interest in new exchanges and updating the wallet.

As much as I like Riecoin I have to say I'm a bit bored with finding 6-tuples at half the current record difficulty. If a major effort is going to be made to upgrade the wallet would you consider also changing the algorithm to make finding large clusters a lot easier? It is really a shame that 6-tuples were chosen. A 6-tuple cannot be part of a 7-tuple or any larger constellation. A 7-tuple on the other hand can be part of every constellation up to 15-tuple. lf we switched to looking for 7-tuple blocks then several blocks a day would also be 8-tuples. These would probably be in the range of the current 8-tuple record. Every couple weeks one of the 7-tuples would also be a 9-tuple. This would smash the current record. If the goal is to find large constellations then why stick with an algorithm that guarantees we never find one?

I think I would also add a second chain that looked for 10 or 11-tuples. This would be a GPU friendly chain that could bring in a lot of new interest in Riecoin.

There are several other things we could consider as well. If this was implemented properly we could probably break most of the records from 7 to 13 or 14. I could probably write this part of the code. I'm also willing to help out with the upgrade but I'm much less familiar with the wallet core. Let me know what you think.

now riecoin price 784 sats. very bad. why why why you dont do anything for your coin.  I say to GATRA. Where will use your coin and what is your aim?. why you dont do any update. For many coins creators  they sold coins to investors and run away. Very good world take million dollars and run away and only 0.5 BTC will give for update. I will give you 0.5 btc. please go and dont come anytime.

All buy orders now disappear as "Price must be at least 0.00001"

This is a bug, please fix.

I think riecoin dead. Gatra only gives 0.5 BTC. I think it is anything. Gatra must do everything and merge from bitcoin. Gatra says that he didnt any time for riecoin. Why poloniex has disabled wallet. I think somebody dont want other riecoins on poloniex. Because they sell their coins. I dont beleive Gatra.

I'm time short so can't do this myself but may be able to give some pointers.  What's your technical level in terms of development (none, some, already looked at Bitcoin source, etc.) and in terms of the process of merging/managing source code in Git?

Yes.  There is no formal how-to documentation but a fairly basic test UI detailing calls.

API itself is self-described at https://zapple.io/exchange/1/_md/index

To call any authenticated call you need to first login by making a call to our authentication API:

PUT https://lts-api.com/auth/1/

Body:
{
  "Username": "XXX",
  "Password": "YYY",
  "TwoFactorAuthenticationCode": null
}

If you have 2FA enabled replace null with your current 2FA code.

In your response will be something like this:

{
"JsonWebToken":"XXXXX",
... other fields
}

Capture the "JsonWebToken" value (XXXXX here) and then in authenticated calls pass it in as authorization header

BEARER XXXXX

Tokens have a validity once issued, you can call a renew endpoint or log back in upon expiry.  You must renew prior to expiry.

What we don't have yet is a single API token that is long-life - so if you have 2FA you'll need to supply the 2FA code when you first start your application and then renew the token every 15 minutes or so.  Dedicated API tokens with long-life are planned.

Thanks for raising this.  I'll get this looked into on Monday.  If you want to empty out remaining balance raise a support message on Zapple and I'll get the transaction processed manually with us absorbing the fee.


With regards to BTC fees minimum deposit is now 0.001 and withdrawal fee is 0.0002.

Hi dear community!

First, kudos and thank you guytp for supporting RIC.

I can't promise anything at the moment but I'm working with getting other exchanges to support RIC.

Now, I have received some justified complains that I'm not active on Riecoin anymore. When I started this amazing project, I had little money to invest but I did have some time I decided to devote to its development. Now things have changed, and while I'm very short on time, I'm lucky enough to be able to commit some money on the project.
So, I'm offering a 0.5 BTC bounty to the person or team that can merge the Bitcoin Core 0.16.0 codebase with RIC and make an updated client that can work with RIC's current protocol and network.
Rules:
- I will review the code and make it the new official Riecoin client
- I decide if the code is ok and worthy of the bounty
- It has to support deterministic builds
- It's not necessary to update all unit tests, but it would be nice
- I decide when the bounty is over

I wish you luck and I'll be available for help with specific questions regarding the code.

Thank you all and let's keep RIC'ing!

Gatra

It was filled, but it turns out I didn't have enough BTC to meet the minimum withdrawal.  I'll go sell some more in a bit and report back!

OK, thank you. 0.0002 BTC withdrawal fee is reasonable (if you actually forgot a 0 in the first paragraph). I am sure that you are doing your best to find the optimal fees after all. Keep the good work up.

DGA, was your order filled and is BTC withdrawal working well?

Deposit Fee: 0
Taker Fee: 0.2%
Maker Fee: 0.1%
Withdrawal Fee: 0.01 RIC
Minimum Deposit: 0.01
Minimum Withdrawal: 0.01
Minimum Order: 0.00000001

Yes, and I'm happy to deal with getting it all going with no formal submission - I've just got to get a RIC node up and synced to the network.

I can aim for this to be live paired against BTC by the end of the week.  I could pair against any of the other bases but I have a feeling BTC will be best for this.

Awesome, Ziiip and DGA! Thank you so much.

Anyone interested in the Isoetes' offer? Currently, if we could list Riecoin in any other exchange, no matter how small is it, it would be great (as long as the exchange does not suck like Poloniex).

Isoetes, you exchange seems to be very small currently, and there is like 5-10 BTC average daily volume on Poloniex. I think that most of it will migrate to your echange if you list it now, this would be a great boost for your exchange. So, I encourage you to add Riecoin, is should be as easy as coins like Litecoin.

And seriously Gatra... Even if you are busy, just take like 1 hour to support your Riecoin community man!

I talked with gatra briefly and asked if we could delegate a member of the community to talk with exchanges but he has not responded to that request.

I propose that we create a community fund to help with exchange listing fees.

I would like to allocate all pool donations for that purpose but that doesn't help the current situation since I will be unable to exchange them.

I Will commit at least 0.5 btc to this fund for starters.

yes,Deposits and withdrawals have been enabled, but my 19270 ric deposit has not been updated.

Any news on Poloniex deposit/withdraw issue? Their statement indicates they may require update from RIC team.