These guys are aware of this post and are talking on slack about trying to debunk that nexus is profitable because they're worried about the influx of new miners will hurt their profitability
Look at date on miner 9/20/17 then go check price of nexus on that day. 1 rig. 111 nexus. Times that by nexus price on that day. >300 usd I believe
Watch out for guys trying to say it's not profitable, they're just trying to stay greedy and keep it for themselves.
But anyways at 936MHS - 4.2 blocks in 1 day 15 hours (2nd screenshot) is not 8-9 blocks a day as you said. If you make 8-9 blocks a day with 900-950MHS a single 1080 can make 1.8 - 2 blocks a day and it's not possible on average.
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: $100 USD/day with one 6x1080 Rig [Best kept secret]
by
dhaern
on 20/10/2017, 05:31:42 UTC
I finished all configs with my 2x1060 and it's running now. 180MHS, I will report profits in a few days. Thanks again.
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: $100 USD/day with one 6x1080 Rig [Best kept secret]
by
dhaern
on 20/10/2017, 03:51:20 UTC
Can you post a link from this SKminer mod Github?
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: $100 USD/day with one 6x1080 Rig [Best kept secret]
by
dhaern
on 20/10/2017, 02:56:35 UTC
thanks for the info, I will try this anyways because dual mining ETH/SC is only giving me low profits with 2x1060
Post
Topic
BoardMining (Altcoins)
Re: $100 USD/day with one 6x1080 Rig [Best kept secret]
by
dhaern
on 20/10/2017, 02:27:53 UTC
Can I try this method with 2x1060 6gb or better stay with Ethereum? I have around 46MHS in Ethereum with Claymore dual mining
I have found no evidence of virus activity in the code and no evidence for the strange redirection to the private stratum-server IP I reported. It could be a result of using the nicehash-software for some time, in between (I use it as auto-fallback, if the main poolmining has a problem). BUT it has a random redirection to the authors mining-address 0x78.. build in. After I patched the software, all DevFee arrives at my own account, without exception. The following submitted-shares numbers are broken down for a 100MHs mining rig for easy comparision.
Unpatched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 176 shares per hour Patched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 182 shares per hour
That makes an average of 6 shares per hour mined to the authors purse.
So, dear @Millenium Falcon, thank your for programming this software, but could you please remove the undocumented mining-redirection to your purse? Or, at least, add a note to your posting regarding this topic?
How do you patching the .exe? with x64dbg? Could you add a little guide for do it please?
Disassembler and debugger - use them.
I know... but again WHAT disassembler and a what edit in disassembler?? I use x64dbg for 64bits .exe or ollydbg/x32dbg for 32bits .exe...
I have found no evidence of virus activity in the code and no evidence for the strange redirection to the private stratum-server IP I reported. It could be a result of using the nicehash-software for some time, in between (I use it as auto-fallback, if the main poolmining has a problem). BUT it has a random redirection to the authors mining-address 0x78.. build in. After I patched the software, all DevFee arrives at my own account, without exception. The following submitted-shares numbers are broken down for a 100MHs mining rig for easy comparision.
Unpatched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 176 shares per hour Patched NoDevFee (24h run): mean value 182 shares per hour
That makes an average of 6 shares per hour mined to the authors purse.
So, dear @Millenium Falcon, thank your for programming this software, but could you please remove the undocumented mining-redirection to your purse? Or, at least, add a note to your posting regarding this topic?
How do you patching the .exe? with x64dbg? Could you add a little guide for do it please?