Lol tarmo still being most abrasive community manager ever. Network still controlled by one Russian dude. Gbyte at all time low versus BTC. Looks like I didn't miss much in last few months. Keep up the good work fellas

You said the truth that Obyte fell to its all time low (or at least all time low range), because I can not check exactly price of all time low range from given chart on coinmarketcap. However, I don't think pessimistic with all time low of Obyte. There are two things that we should notice and deeply consider: price falls nearly been slow down significantly; and volume decreased to very low level over last one year (mainly due to bitcoin drops in 2018 and long winter of crypto in general). Two things above disclose and give us reasonable hope that Obyte might stop its falls soon because its bottom has been already found or nearly close to hit its bottom range (all time low bottom).
there is no bottom. Obyte just refresh ATL time to time
Out of Obyte control was to know all the other ICO deposit addresses
you are a moon boy, really you can't know what happened before the first distribution. The community knew
all the big ICO addresses, and it is a known fact that bittrex did not distribute bytes to bytes traders.
It's not even GBYTE/USD all time low, it is GBYTE/BTC all time low, which is hard to predict because it totally depends how volatile BTC/USD price is ($4000 to $8200 in 2 months, $7800 to $7000 to $7400 just in last 48 hours). You talk about GBYTE/BTC all time low because it fits your narrative, but when it comes to BTC price then you never compare it with BTC/ETH or some other pair, it's always compared to something more stable like USD.
Well, maybe the community knows all the big ICO addresses right now too, but it doesn't matter if there is no complete list that you can add to a software. Obyte had 10 rounds of distribution before it was cancelled and by that time, the ICO madness was in full swing and there was no complete list of ICO deposit addresses.
Oh, so now you whine that Bittrex was not giving users bytes for bytes. Just like bytes for BTC, it is not possible to know in advance if it was going to their permanent decision or not. There are many thing that could have done differently, but if your idea is that all whales should have been banned from BTC airdrop then that is ridiculous because you don't know in advance if they will distribute the bytes to their users or not. You can see that only as looking back at it when it is already too late to change it because you already gave out the bytes.
Yeah, whatever, I can be a moonboy if you want, I don't really care because it's not true. It is you who is butthurt about the price, not me. It is you who is spreading FUD, not me. It is you who does nothing to help Obyte, not me. It is you who is obsessed about the price, while I am just calling out your FUD. I don't go around trying to pump or dump the price, I just react to those talk sh!t on project I am working on.
The main distribution to Bitcoin addresses occurred in the first round - 10%. The rest of the distribution was insignificant, for the most part it was distribution of bytes on bytes. It is obvious that the main gain went to the bytes received in the first distribution. I have never opposed whales. The only time I actively participated in the discussion about ICO addresses was the first distribution. We knew all the major ICO addresses from the time they were linked to the snapshot. It was enough to remove 4 addresses. The same goes for Bittrex, they did not link Bitcoins, they simply received bytes on the deposits of their users and never distributed them. One such case was enough to remove Bittrex address. But again this was not done. Stop spreading this bullshit that we didn't know the addresses. We knew them all.
you know nothing about history of this coin so shut up and enjoy the flight down. You can be sure that no user who has spent time studying the coin will not be fooled by your bullshit. They all recognize the true distribution situation.