Thank you! I am working on smart contracts to make it easier for ICOs to join the platform right now.

My problem with bounties is the low quality. I think that bounties should be organised as contests for best articles, most creative posts, etc., otherwise the quality drops dramatically.


Thanks, butka!

 Did you check my project? I am collecting feedback and looking for ICOs to join the cause.

And what if...those airdrops can help people in need? I believe that ICOs are giving away too much tokens for useless airdrops,instead of supporting meaningful causes...so I am doing a little experiment - I created Noble Airdrops to convince ICOs to support the ones in real need. Projects willing to donate tokens for charity will receive exposure on the platform. Check it out: http://nobleairdrops.org

We are negotiating with 3 ICOs and hopefully we will announce them this week. Meanwhile we are looking for partnering websites and media.

Okay, but are you ready to comment the actual situation? Those freelancers you are mentioning are usually producing extremely low quality content and sharing the project with absolutely irrelevant friends networks. The real freelancers have for long time raised the quality and established real media quoting much more significant sums for producing content. For what I have experienced, the bounty content is pretty useless.

In the beginning bounty programs were really smart "organic" marketing. Incentivising people to promote your project, so that you can grow organically without spending too much, since your project is about collecting funds, not spending.

But for a long time now it has become an endless spending fiasco and results are really poor, since the bounty hunters aren't early project adopters and geeks anymore, but low quality spammers who have no impact on their followers  and have no intentions of supporting and developing the projects they are "promoting".

What do you think - is giving $50,000 - 150,000 worth of tokens for bounties still worth?

Isn't it better to give those coins for charity organisations and support people in real need?

Less likes, more good karma?

Just thinking, curious about your opinion...

Hello, please contact admins on our Telegram group.

In the next 3 hours you have the chance to buy VRN with 40% discount. Hurry up!

https://dashboard.vernam.com

We'll launch one soon

Really important question, tatangas215!

How and why we'll use blockchain?


Given the lack of transparency and the resulting misinformation, or loss of trust between end customers, insurance providers, and intermediaries, such as brokers and agents, we are confident that the decentralized nature of the blockchain technology will help to recover the lost balance and will provide a platform, driven by shared data and mutual trust, while at the same time the clients may benefit from reducing administrative cost of the insurance products.

The blockchain sub-system of Vernam, is system of inter-related smart contracts.

It has two main purposes:

• Create Insurance Smart Contracts as a proof of the issuance of insurance and its details

• Transfer a commission back in the form of VRN Tokens

Read detailed description of the implementation of blockchain on the Vernam platform in our whitepaper.


You can read our FAQ posts on our blog. There you'll find answers on everything important about the Vernam project.

Part 1 - The product





Part 2 - The VRN token

Glad to hear that, it's important that people see how much we really have sacrificed to bring this project live.

By the way, have you seen the video presentation of our CEO Roman?

Hey guys, during the last two months we received tons of questions regarding the Vernam project, so we decided to put together the most asked ones and write series of posts about them.

We are starting with the project-related questions - click on the picture to open the post on our blog:

Thank you, we really appreciate it.


You should check our whitepaper. There's a lot planned even after the ICO. We will set up an insurance broker network and start operating in Europe, depending on how much funds we collect.

Hey Candam.

You can check our whitepaper here - click on the picture:




Have a look at our video too:





Hey, Silasa. You can check our Medium blogpost with the announcement of our main sale dates:

Hello there, ICOBench team.

I'd like to open a topic on the value of ICOBench's experts opinions and whether some of the are not abusing the rights they have.

I am member of Vernam's team - a promising project running for more than two months now, with upcoming token sale in late May.
When we launched our project, of course the first platform we listed ourselves was ICOBench, as the most respected one on the web.

We started getting reviews by experts. Normally some are good, other are bad. The most valuable ones are helping us improve the project with constructive feedback.

Anyway, there are some reviews that worry us. For example this one:




Obviously Mr. Berger didn't like the project and we can't blame him. Anyway, he didn't provide any feedback, just the low scores. I decided to make my own due diligence and I found out that:

1. At the time when he rated our project, Mr. Berger was running an ICO himself, as a CEO - Pecunio.
2. 90% of the projects he rated at that time got really bad scores. See:




This makes me think that Mr. Berger used his expert status to harm competition in a really lame way. How will you comment this?

Hey cattano. The target is the hard cap and, of course, the moon and beyond

These are the three caps and what we are planning to achieve when we reach them: