Search content
Sort by

Showing 7 of 7 results by dolor
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 20:44:53 UTC
Quote
Dolor - there is no way you are Eastern European with that level of written English.
Let's play a game. I'll start.

Dolor = Mr LorenzoMoney
thepostman = VE
reloaded = crumbs
Mabsark = Mabsark




Feel free to doubt.   In the meantime, here's another challenging puzzle for you:  See how many workers you can find working on Ken's assembly line Smiley

http://s8.postimg.org/b5lbdv751/product.jpg

Feel free to post your answer below.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 18:35:36 UTC
Mabsark, people have explained to you why your dates are so off.  The thought that you are correct because Ken didn't instantly set you straight is as ludicrous as your belief that the introduction of Intellihash means the entire process must start again from scratch.

The reason his dates are off is simple -- Ken never gives you any dates.
Ken has learned that his being oblique and engaging in childish wordplay allows his "investors" to spin elaborate fantasies and justifications for verifiable facts -- no product.  Some here imagined that hashrate spikes in November resulted from Ken's testing of 24TH megaminers.  Lulz.

Keep doing what you're doing, and you will be rewarded accordingly.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 18:28:58 UTC
...
Mabs, can you at least try to understand what's going on before posting? The Intellihash update is software (RTL/HDL) level code changing1. Software level changes are a far cry from a complete chip redesign. So your estimated time frame is not realistic at all.
...

Ken stated the chips were late.  He attributed this to needing to redesign the chips, making them "up to 20% more efficient" (cue 20% Cooler FIM FTW!).  Delayed chip production can not be attributed to software, learn to SHA256 ASIC.  If the mysterious Intellihash is indeed software capable of being run on top of any chips, Ken's explanation of delayed chips is clearly a lie.  Delayed chips is hardware, not software.  Learn to difference.
There's simply too much fail in this thread.

Quote
Intellihash is our new trademark for our new Bitcoin mining software which gives up to a 20% increase in hashing speed and has the possibility to increase the speed of our mining machines as the difficulty goes up.  We have had to modify the software in our chips to make it work with our new software.  The chips are going to be late; however, our new Intellihash software could be a game changer for the company.

Changing the RTL code will result in a delay, albeit much less then a full redesign.

It would behoove you to do some research into how KnC got their speed boost. Wink (Hint: it wasn't a chip redesign!)

tl;dr Software.

Quote
We have had to modify the software in our chips to make it work with our new software.

The above quote is nonsensical to anyone familiar with SHA256 ASIC design.  Such ASICS have no more software than your CPU, which is none.
Any changes to the RTL code, no matter how minor, require a new mask set & a new foundry run.  Fact.

TL;DR:  Stop repeating nonsense.

I take it you didn't look into KnC? Wink

You are right, there is delays in the process, but it is less than a full redesign - which is all that I stated. If you are just going to ignore test cases like KnC, who DID receive a significant speed boost via software optimization, (some at the hardware level) then we have nothing more to discuss.

KNC's software optimisation did not require silicon redesign.  Ken claims that his Intellihash, while making his chips 20% Cooler(tm) Hasbro, required silicon redesign & was responsible for the delays.  This is nonsense -- either he botched the RTL code or he didn't.  Discovering that the chips could have been 20% Cooler(tm) Hasbro after tapeout is a sure sign of incompetence.  So is delaying the product by months to achieve 20% higher hashrate -- during which time the difficulty climbed over 100%.

None of this makes any sense.  Time to wake up.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 18:00:31 UTC
...
Mabs, can you at least try to understand what's going on before posting? The Intellihash update is software (RTL/HDL) level code changing1. Software level changes are a far cry from a complete chip redesign. So your estimated time frame is not realistic at all.
...

Ken stated the chips were late.  He attributed this to needing to redesign the chips, making them "up to 20% more efficient" (cue 20% Cooler FIM FTW!).  Delayed chip production can not be attributed to software, learn to SHA256 ASIC.  If the mysterious Intellihash is indeed software capable of being run on top of any chips, Ken's explanation of delayed chips is clearly a lie.  Delayed chips is hardware, not software.  Learn to difference.
There's simply too much fail in this thread.

Quote
Intellihash is our new trademark for our new Bitcoin mining software which gives up to a 20% increase in hashing speed and has the possibility to increase the speed of our mining machines as the difficulty goes up.  We have had to modify the software in our chips to make it work with our new software.  The chips are going to be late; however, our new Intellihash software could be a game changer for the company.

Changing the RTL code will result in a delay, albeit much less then a full redesign.

It would behoove you to do some research into how KnC got their speed boost. Wink (Hint: it wasn't a chip redesign!)

tl;dr Software.

Quote
We have had to modify the software in our chips to make it work with our new software.

The above quote is nonsensical to anyone familiar with SHA256 ASIC design.  Such ASICS have no more software than your CPU, which is none.
Any changes to the RTL code, no matter how minor, require a new mask set & a new foundry run.  Fact.

TL;DR:  Stop repeating nonsense.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [ActiveMining] The Official Active Mining Discussion Thread [Self-Moderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 17:35:03 UTC
...
Mabs, can you at least try to understand what's going on before posting? The Intellihash update is software (RTL/HDL) level code changing1. Software level changes are a far cry from a complete chip redesign. So your estimated time frame is not realistic at all.
...

Ken stated the chips were late.  He attributed this to needing to redesign the chips, making them "up to 20% more efficient" (cue 20% Cooler FIM FTW!).  Delayed chip production can not be attributed to software, learn to SHA256 ASIC.  If the mysterious Intellihash is indeed software capable of being run on top of any chips, Ken's explanation of delayed chips is clearly a lie.  Delayed chips is hardware, not software.  Learn to difference.
There's simply too much fail in this thread.
Post
Topic
Board Securities
Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated]
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 14:11:13 UTC
Active Miners!

I welcome you into the land where group hugs and delirium tremens have ousted common sense.  Where sulfurous stench is never-ending, and Madness festers on the face of Despair, the wretched harlot who birthed you the bastard Poverty!

Crumbs, Stuartuk, zumzero have worked tirelessly together to ouster logic and critical thought.  And now also the axe is laid unto the root of the trees: therefore every tree which bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down , and cast into the fire.

The dark reign of Ken, whose name is Legion, is upon you!
Abandon hope, all ye who enter here, for Now You're Thinking With Portals!

https://images.weserv.nl/?url=s11.postimg.org/o1nasp4kz/portal.jpg&fnr

Merry Christmas everyone!
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Hey!!
by
dolor
on 26/12/2013, 01:58:39 UTC
Merry Christmas! First post must be posted first.