Search content
Sort by
Showing 17 of 17 results by donalddump
It is not exactly a fact that they will need an ID verification in case of the 55% withdrawal.
The verification would only be if that suspicious "investor company" (probably btce again on another mule) takes over, which is, in their words, bound to KYC/AML laws.
However, even though it says "all users need to verfiy" it is not entirely clear if they mean the btce token holders or the first 55% withdraws.
Indeed it looks really weird at this point.
The verification would only be if that suspicious "investor company" (probably btce again on another mule) takes over, which is, in their words, bound to KYC/AML laws.
However, even though it says "all users need to verfiy" it is not entirely clear if they mean the btce token holders or the first 55% withdraws.
Indeed it looks really weird at this point.
It took me almost 1 month to get fully verified on bitstamp while they had more employees than btc-e and they didn't have to verify all users at once.
How much will take btc-e to verify all users? At least 1 year!
In this time fbi will follow crypto trace and will shut down the new exchange.The only ones that will get their coins will be btc-e owners and few lucky users.
Why would they choose to verify all users when for people that do not use fiat and for people that have small amounts of cash verification is not needed to stay legal?
What investment company will want to associate their name to BTC-E right now? There is no investor! The new company will be registered on some homeless guy name and total assets will be 100$.
If they are innocent and they will fight in court of law for justice why do they drop BTC-E brand for another one?
They need us to wash their dirty money and we will not only help them wash their money but we will also pay 45% of our money for this.
Anonymous fugitive owners, accused of money laundering and identity theft asking for people personal documents seems legit.
If they are innocent and they will fight in court of law for justice why do they drop BTC-E brand for another one?
They need us to wash their dirty money and we will not only help them wash their money but we will also pay 45% of our money for this.
Anonymous fugitive owners, accused of money laundering and identity theft asking for people personal documents seems legit.
No fiat processor will work with them, they will not work under BTC-E brand meaning they do not intend to pay the 110 mil fine, their company is registered on a 20 yo person with a capital of 100 pounds.
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
The solution for you is simple, don't participate and you don't have to worry.
No I don't have to participate.
I was naive once to put my coins on a shady exchange, I won't be naive twice to send my documents to some unknown company registered in panama or something like this with a capital of 100 pounds.
What I can do is contact a lawyer and I will only send them my documents if the court of law will decide I have to.
No fiat processor will work with them, they will not work under BTC-E brand meaning they do not intend to pay the 110 mil fine, their company is registered on a 20 yo person with a capital of 100 pounds.
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
They need our documents to comply with kyc & aml legislation
What legislation?
They will not work with fiat meaning they do not need kyc & aml.
They do not intend to pay the fine meaning they are doing another trick to escape the law.
They do not share any information about the real owners.
And after all this they want to comply kyc legislation?
It's very strange to say at least.
No fiat processor will work with them, they will not work under BTC-E brand meaning they do not intend to pay the 110 mil fine, their company is registered on a 20 yo person with a capital of 100 pounds.
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
Why do they need our documents? To open bank accounts on our names or another fictive companies for their scams?
The question is will you send your personal documents to people accused of identity theft?
How about if someone wants to withdraw crypto only?
No exchange asking for personal documents if someone only deposiit/withdraw crypto.
How about if someone wants to withdraw crypto only?
No exchange asking for personal documents if someone only deposiit/withdraw crypto.
They stated all users have to do verification.
Well, could be FBI operation after all, getting everybody to verify themselves. Would be really funny, if Vinnik was indeed owner and handed the btce logins for bitcointalk and twitter over to the FBI. And now they are planning the next coupe.
It's very strange.Their business have no future.Everybody will withdraw their coins.I can't see any reason for this strict KYC, AML policies.
The question is will you send your personal documents to people accused of identity theft?
How about if someone wants to withdraw crypto only?
No exchange asking for personal documents if someone only deposiit/withdraw crypto.
How about if someone wants to withdraw crypto only?
No exchange asking for personal documents if someone only deposiit/withdraw crypto.
Look at this profile https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=577
He was running an exchange btcex https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BTCex
After 2011 incident btc-e start to operate.
Just like btc-e owners, btcex owner remain anonymous despite users speculations about his identity.
He was running an exchange btcex https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/BTCex
Quote
The site closed temporarily, beginning 12 May 2011 after claiming that a user claimed irregularities in trading and threatened legal action. The exchange re-opened in early June, with 5/6 (83%) of each user's bitcoins missing (eg. if one had an account balance of 120BTC before they went down, only 20BTC were left). Their support remain silent.
Since July 23, 2012 the site is reporting an additional, unexpected "maintenance closure". Customers are reporting that they have no access to their funds
Since July 23, 2012 the site is reporting an additional, unexpected "maintenance closure". Customers are reporting that they have no access to their funds
After 2011 incident btc-e start to operate.
Just like btc-e owners, btcex owner remain anonymous despite users speculations about his identity.
Silence is not helping btc-e owners.
Now users are making speculations and maybe they are on wrong path but sooner or later either users will find them or fbi will leak some more information and their life will be a hell if they are trying to run with people's money.
They can hide money but coins path will remain in blockchain forever
Now users are making speculations and maybe they are on wrong path but sooner or later either users will find them or fbi will leak some more information and their life will be a hell if they are trying to run with people's money.
They can hide money but coins path will remain in blockchain forever
your all replies are FUD or time wasting
Said the one with 137 100% useless posts.
Silence is not helping btc-e owners.
Now users are making speculations and maybe they are on wrong path but sooner or later either users will find them or fbi will leak some more information and their life will be a hell if they are trying to run with people's money.
They can hide money but coins path will remain in blockchain forever
Now users are making speculations and maybe they are on wrong path but sooner or later either users will find them or fbi will leak some more information and their life will be a hell if they are trying to run with people's money.
They can hide money but coins path will remain in blockchain forever
Are you guys still believe in santa? We will not get any refund from Btc-e nor US government . US government always interpret their own laws depending on their own interests and Btc-e owners right now are covering the tracks so they can run away with remaining funds, or they will offer the funds to fbi to avoid getting in jail.
As I said before we need a new coin where, in situations like this, users can vote and in case of a majority will freeze the stolen coins until the exchange or authorities can prove which coins are dirty and which are legit.
Somebody said that will be the end of crypto.I don't think so.Look at ethereum, they did roll back and the price and popularity compared to 2016 is huge. There are thousands of coins nobody is using so another useless coin will not be the end of crypto.
I'm a trader not a programmer, but if somebody will make a coin that:
If something like this is technically possible then I will be happy to make a donation to help development.
As I said before we need a new coin where, in situations like this, users can vote and in case of a majority will freeze the stolen coins until the exchange or authorities can prove which coins are dirty and which are legit.
Somebody said that will be the end of crypto.I don't think so.Look at ethereum, they did roll back and the price and popularity compared to 2016 is huge. There are thousands of coins nobody is using so another useless coin will not be the end of crypto.
I'm a trader not a programmer, but if somebody will make a coin that:
- is based on some type of pos algorithm where stake will be very small 1coin or something very small to ensure everyone can take part
- generated coins will be awarded to a random peer(s) or some algo to ensure fair coin distribution
- a simple voting system so the community will decide in case like gox, btc-e or major software changes
If something like this is technically possible then I will be happy to make a donation to help development.
What if btc-e admins dump database with every email address and balance after fbi seized their funds and 51% of btc,ltc,etc. miners decide to empty fbi addresses containing stolen fund and refund the innocents?
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.
It's going to be the end of crypto.
It has been debated on every hack, it has been debated on the last FBI auction.
By doing this the miners will act like a central bank so it will set a precedent.
Who will be next?
If there is 0 anonymity, 0 protection against hackers / authorities abuse, if all coins are more centralized and more corrupt than fiat what is the point in using them?
If 51% attack from thieves can steal coins why 51% of honest users cannot make justice? Double standard.Just like in fiat when sh1t happens the only one who lose is the average user.
Cryptos not only are copying fiat, they become a disgusting version of fiat.
I'm out.
What if btc-e admins dump database with every email address and balance after fbi seized their funds and 51% of btc,ltc,etc. miners decide to empty fbi addresses containing stolen fund and refund the innocents?
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.
they wouldn't do it if 20 million coins were seized, let alone a few thousand.
ethereum wouldn't any more either. this is in no way an existential threat. it's a tragedy for the people who lose out if they are seized. that's it.
This is because pools and master nodes are cancer.
There should be a coin where pools and master nodes won't work, where every one that will run a full node to be able to vote and his 1 coin vote should have same value as another user that have 1000 coins, a coin that should have a user friendly builtin vote system.
If there was such a coin gox would not have happened nor btc-e.
If there was such a coin hackers or authorities abuse won't exist.
If btc-e are still in control of coins they cannot turn them into cash because fbi will have easy job to trace them.
But if they allow users to withdrawal their coin they can put a limit of 100-200 USD a day and a different address each time and they will be able to withdrawal their own coins.
Think about it more than 100,000 users with multiple addresses each will be the biggest mixer of all time.
Considering that hackers won't keep coins in a exchange for long because they want to cash out asap then 99% of users funds are legit so if fbi will try to verify each address and each user will cost them more than they will be able to confiscate.
But if they allow users to withdrawal their coin they can put a limit of 100-200 USD a day and a different address each time and they will be able to withdrawal their own coins.
Think about it more than 100,000 users with multiple addresses each will be the biggest mixer of all time.
Considering that hackers won't keep coins in a exchange for long because they want to cash out asap then 99% of users funds are legit so if fbi will try to verify each address and each user will cost them more than they will be able to confiscate.
What if btc-e admins dump database with every email address and balance after fbi seized their funds and 51% of btc,ltc,etc. miners decide to empty fbi addresses containing stolen fund and refund the innocents?
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.
In the end all cryptos are open source, everyone is free to modify and run the version they want so it will not be anything illegal.
This will send a strong message to US that if they play dirty the community can play dirty too.