When it comes to TA Gods then there would be corresponding possible trail on where price can shoot up but basing off on how the market move into those previous years
then that do basically shows that technicals arent always precise.To presume that there are lots of people havent expected that 2017 bull run where it is already out of
their technical analysis or not anticipated.Same goes with those technicals made in 2018 that there would be some recovery in the end of the year and it didnt happen.
People didnt even anticipate that we would be heading 19k in 3 years time which do justifies that no one can precise predict on what would be the outcome or
next movement.

Probably not it goes like that, 1st and 2nd quarter is not the dumps that we don't want to happen.
Try to look at this last 2018, after the 2017 bullish ends.

https://i.imgur.com/592QdNA.png
source: https://www.coindesk.com/down-more-than-70-in-2018-bitcoin-closes-its-worst-year-on-record

Only it appears that the bearish season had come to the market at 3rd quarter until 1st quarter of 2019. This could possible that bearish will also appear once again late next year (2021), less possible during its 1st and 2nd quarter.

Technical analyst are humans; humans are humans, there is no god anywhere; just expertise and sometimes the best analyst go wrong too. Quarter 1, 2, 3 or 4; bitcoin dips and take bull positions; how do you define historical bad? I will advise you continue to do your own research for your own capital safety.

It is possible, but liquidity provider takes currency risk on his arms. The main condition for the delivery of a stable, safe trading platform is to stay as far as it is possible from unnecessary risks. CEX takes fee from others taking a risk trading on CEX and it can also take fee from others taking a risk from providing liquidity in liquidity pools - binance already launched it's own swap service that allow users to provide liquidity -https://cointelegraph.com/news/binance-takes-on-defi-with-uniswap-competitor-and-liquidity-mining

actually don't understand about this but as far as I know you can't send any erc20 there because if you want to try ample geyser you can only send ample tokens not something else, and this is a guide for managing geysers maybe you can also read this Article and asking about this questions on ampl community.

yes, that is how cryptography has been its entire lifetime. ever since it was perceived more than 2 thousand years ago (before computers), every cryptography method had an expiration date when they become obsolete and are replaced by newer ones that are stronger before the same thing happens to them too.
as for ECC and SHA256 (the two main cryptography used in bitcoin), i don't think they would become obsolete anytime soon but when they do, Bitcoin simply upgrades to newer and stronger algorithms.

I was supposed to post this link https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5157696.0 but mk4 beat me to it. Anyway, that thread, which is only at least a year old, has a rich discussion on quantum computing and how it is possibly not a threat to Bitcoin.

But please be warned in advance that the discussion is highly technical and with long, albeit very information-rich, posts which left me more confused than before. But you will certainly gain a lot from it if you have dead serious questions and anxieties on quantum computers possibly a threat to Bitcoin and cryptocurrency in general.