It looks like once you find 10-12 blocks in solo mining, the periodic hash rate starts to even out.  It’s hard with Minotaur because blocks don’t come that often, unlike pool mining where shares are 3-4 per minute.

My idea was to protect LCC.

But fuck that.

Here is the code :

https://ufile.io/pl6xoyqb

it does not sshow wallet.dat it shows  leafcoin-wallet-keys-2014-03-18

my wallet was created from my mobile phone

do u not understand what im saying? My leafcoin wallet backup was created with an ANDROID wallet APP how can i restore it with a windows wallet dont i need the android app to load the backup to retrieve the coins?

The above is correct but to answer the rest of your question : look in your breaker box. are they 15amp breakers or 20 or what..
take that and x 110 (thought technically 120/240 - real world best to base your math on 110/220)  this will give you  the wattage that
the WHOLE circuit can run..at MAX if your wires are crappy and barely acceptable for the amps you will be drawing they will get hot.. (gotter the closer you get to max..)  so lets say 15  so that is a max of 1650.. (oh wait keep in mind your psu will draw MORE than the 1200 it is giving to the machine.. by like.. alot. )  so realistically.. you can do it on 15 amp breakers IF you have pretty much NOTHING else on the circuit.. how to find out? flip a breaker.. what all went off... that;s all on the same circuit. voila.


my bad.. the rest of HIS question. sorry still getting coffee in me.

I'm in USA so 120 volt or 110 not sure.

What is the highest I can put my ASIC Voltage to without it breaking/popping any circuits?

Power cost is not the concern and I'm pretty sure the max power draw is 1300 watts from the AMP3++ power supply from bitmain?

I want highest hash rate possible... POWER cost is not a problem the only problem is popping a circuit!


Thanks

If anybody is interested in buying an L3+ Jan batch for 0.3 BTC + shipping drop me a PM. It's still under warranty as I haven't installed blissz firmware yet. If I don't sell it I'll probably give this a try soon, since the D3 version is working really well for me.

And this time it showed 2 hashboards down. Should I be worried?

Is this a bad sign of things to come? It is running around 65 degrees now.
My other machines are all fine though

Hey Blissz

first of all, thx again for such a good firmware (like for D3)


Jan 11 22:01:39 (none) local0.info cgminer[375]: Failed to getaddrinfo for stratum+tcp://:(null)
Jan 11 22:01:44 (none) local0.info cgminer[375]: Failed to getaddrinfo for stratum+tcp://:(null)
Jan 11 22:01:49 (none) local0.info cgminer[375]: Failed to getaddrinfo for stratum+tcp://:(null)
Jan 11 22:01:54 (none) local0.info cgminer[375]: Failed to getaddrinfo for stratum+tcp://:(null)

I appreciate the assurance, but that side-steps the point. If it's based on or derived from GPLv3 code, it must be made available once distributed. It's OK to make a buck off of distributing the modified product, but you can't go closed-source and withhold your modifications to GPL3-based code or binaries you're distributing.

There was another firmware hacker case a few months back:    
Re: Bounty for Cracking Bitmain S9 BMminer

At least Blissz here actually put in some work (albeit source code yet to be published), whereas -- from what I observed in the Github repositories -- fubly seems to have simply rebadged Bitmain's source code, and removed irrelevant hardware support to slim things down. The guy also had the audacity to remove Colin Kolivas (original author) from the credits and also send a $120K invoice to Bitmain.

Anyway, cgminer is GPL3, so I look forward to examining the source in the near future. Thanks!

I'm wondering.. where can I obtain and inspect the source code used to create the CGMiner binary included in this distribution?

Isn't that a GPL3 compliance issue that people bashed another firmware hacker about a couple of years back?