A rumor in Florida is that Martin Armstrong tested positive on coronavirus. Supposedly Mr. Armstrong has mild symptoms right now but his condition can be exacerbated by syphilis he contracted during the last WEC.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 07/03/2020, 20:42:54 UTC
So awesome to see Martin's lies being exposed on this forum!
I wonder what is Gumbi's motivation for defending Martin Armstrong and writing one nonsense post after another. He is presumably so knowledgeable about Fake Socrates but cannot show how to make a successful trade.
Me thinks that this forum is costing a lot of subscriptions to Martin Armstrong and MA knows this and is sweating. I will not be surprised if Gumbi is Martin Armstrong's hired aid or even The Charlatan Forecaster himself. LOL ... how awesome is that!
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 26/11/2019, 20:59:59 UTC
Yeah, Martin Armstrong's gold predictions were terrible, too. What a charlatan and fraud criminal!
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 14/11/2019, 21:38:41 UTC
"The only failure on the part of Armstrong is he never updated his 2018 year report ..." Right, lol. I think we all missed Martin Armstrong's disclaimer at the end: Everything Martin Armstrong forecasts should be treated as out-of-date and invalid garbage.
P.S. Martin Armstrong is a con artists and Socrates is a scam.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 11/11/2019, 03:39:34 UTC
Martin Armstrong and Socrates are fraud. Martin Armstrong will steal your money.
Martin Armstrong is a fraud and you will lose money following his advice.
1. It's not fraud to loose money on a financial advice of somebody else. This happens many times and only in certain circumstances it may be fraud 2. It sounds like you made the same mistake as Lindegas and others here. Relying primarily on statements on the private blog. 3. eventually you didn't noticed the issues with Socrates that were discussed here in this forum and another forum.
Alex-11, just to clarify. You do not have to feel obligated to come up with invalid 1, 2 and 3 excuses as you do not know my situation.
For everyone who is looking to find out the truth about Martin Armstrong, I will repeat again.
After listening to Martin Armstrong for many years and trading based on Socrates, I came to the conclusion that Martin Armstrong is a fraud and you will lose money following his advice.
And I would like to thank the participants of this forum for exposing Martin Armstrong as a con artist and Socrates as a fraud.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 07/11/2019, 16:50:22 UTC
Thank you for exposing MA.
I read MA's blog for almost 10 years and was one of early subscribers to Socrates. I canceled my subscription earlier this year because of terrible trading results.
Martin Armstrong is a fraud and you will lose money following his advice.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 22/03/2019, 02:26:28 UTC
My interpretation (based on March 19 & 13 posts) as of now:
DOW is in the consolidation period but it needs to go down to create a bear trap for a slingshot move. May - low, July - high, early 2020 - possible bear trap, then - up
Ok, so the private blog post from March 19 is not very useful IMO.
I can summarize main points: 1. Nothing suggests a major crash 2. Does not look like we are ready for new highs 3. Going into recession until early 2020 4. May and July are two targets. The plausible scenario is DOW low in May and high in July. No specific numbers but we may not even elect a weekly bearish to make that low. 5. Preparing for a slingshot move. Bear trap first - majority needs to be wrong - and then quick upside move.
No arrays or numbers in this post at all.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 19/03/2019, 00:06:52 UTC
Nigel Farage to Address the WEC in Rome May 3rd & 4th
That is a big deal. It suggests that MA is indeed very-well-connected and internationally known. Subscriptions from Europeans will skyrocket.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 25/02/2019, 22:03:05 UTC
I do not disagree with you. I lost money by following Martin/Socrates is the past three months. In fact, the exact opposite things happened from what he/it "predicted".
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 25/02/2019, 16:09:55 UTC
Since we elected the weekly bullish reversal, there is a higher probability to move higher.
I do not have access to the Pro level post from Feb 22. But his Basic level post on Feb 23 was not very useful. He stated that Europeans were buying and Americans were selling. Socrates predicted this by electing 11 buy signals since the December low.
Post
Topic
BoardEconomics
Re: Martin Armstrong Discussion
by
dow_wizard
on 31/01/2019, 15:29:28 UTC
A panic cycle did not play out this week yet, did it?