Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 30 results by drwhobox
Re: Do you think campaign managers enrol their alts in their own campaigns?
Quote
How would you even know and certain that those managers you like do not do what you are imagining for the managers you don't like? A completely BS topic to read and reply.
That is the ideology of the forum: freedom.
You don't have to know why OP starts the thread; he is exercising their right to express themselves. We shouldn’t politicize everything.
Problem: OP is certain that the managers he like does not have alt account to abuse. How? Only make sense when you involve politics.
Today's spammer can become a real asset for the forum tomorrow.
In 10 years on Bitcointalk, I've seen that happen only once.There was a user I can not remember his name. He was banned for spamming but later he earned a good name. I am not regular so I can't remember the name clearly. In fact, I don't know if I will recognize the user if I see him in a discussion.
The first time I saw this topic, yesterday, I laughed pretty hard. Then I saw it again today and laughed again.
The problem is these types of posts - as well as many others - are written with the sole intention of extracting merits; usually from merit sources. They are not written out of a genuine desire to contribute to the forum in any reasonable way, any more than they are written out of an actual appreciation for "Cousin's Day" or what have you.
I agree but I'd rather attract people who have actual knowledge (or anything interesting) to contribute. Regardless of what I think, accounts are free to shitpost nothingness to their heart's content. Nobody can stop them, unless they are writing pure spam or plagiarism, of course.
It was much larger at one point, when it was the hub for discussion of all things Bitcoin, as well as altcoin launches & ICOs. Shitposting for merits should be discouraged, however. We should encourage people to learn and demonstrate knowledge & creativity rather than encouraging them to master the art of sucking up.
I laughed from the whore part. Sometimes we need fun.I don't see anything wrong with these posts. People can post anything after all this a discussion forum.
The problem is these types of posts - as well as many others - are written with the sole intention of extracting merits; usually from merit sources. They are not written out of a genuine desire to contribute to the forum in any reasonable way, any more than they are written out of an actual appreciation for "Cousin's Day" or what have you.
We really need to encourage members to be more active in the community so that the community expands even more.
I agree but I'd rather attract people who have actual knowledge (or anything interesting) to contribute. Regardless of what I think, accounts are free to shitpost nothingness to their heart's content. Nobody can stop them, unless they are writing pure spam or plagiarism, of course.
Bitcointalk community is still a very small size community. Help each others, if you can not help at least do not discourage them for the sake of saving some merits.
It was much larger at one point, when it was the hub for discussion of all things Bitcoin, as well as altcoin launches & ICOs. Shitposting for merits should be discouraged, however. We should encourage people to learn and demonstrate knowledge & creativity rather than encouraging them to master the art of sucking up.
That being said, I agree with you in most of the arguments. My point is, if someone earn merit from others and if that smerits are from established members then I do not see anything wrong. After all we need the users to rank up unlike me who really not much into ranking and activities.
Sometimes a little encouragement can make a huge difference in people's behavior. Today's spammer can become a real asset for the forum tomorrow.
Re: Do you think campaign managers enrol their alts in their own campaigns?
OP I don't think you are a very important user of this forum but it looks like you are trying to promote yourself as a very important user. Campaign managers are very important group for the forum economic which brings the traffic. Users like you and me, we do a little for this place compering to the managers.
That being said, what is your purpose of this topic and the poll?
How would you even know and certain that those managers you like do not do what you are imagining for the managers you don't like? A completely BS topic to read and reply.
That being said, what is your purpose of this topic and the poll?
I will not mention names of the highly respected campaign managers that I am certain do not cheat via this nefarious activity because the attention would fall on the managers I did not name (when attention should fall on them without me mentioning names anyway)
As far as I understood, you want to praise some managers you personally like and using an insulting tone to the managers you don't like.How would you even know and certain that those managers you like do not do what you are imagining for the managers you don't like? A completely BS topic to read and reply.
I don't see anything wrong with these posts. People can post anything after all this a discussion forum. We really need to encourage member to be more active in the community so that the community expands even more. Bitcointalk community is still very small size community. Help each others, if you can not help at least do not discourage them for the sake of saving some merits.
Activity can not be a good indicator to find alts. To be honest I have decent activities, no activities, some activities, several times no activities, low activities. The forum sometimes does not interest me sometimes does. Activities depend on your time, interest, goal and including many other factors.
Goal is a major factor for activities. Someone's goal can become a legendary, someone's goal can be earning from signature campaigns, someone's goal can be sharing their opinions others can have goal like me (no goal at all. Recently I am reading interesting topics, ignoring major discussions, if something looks odd only then sharing opinions). I like this forum because I can express me when I feel I need to.
With that being said, OP is not looking an honest member.
Goal is a major factor for activities. Someone's goal can become a legendary, someone's goal can be earning from signature campaigns, someone's goal can be sharing their opinions others can have goal like me (no goal at all. Recently I am reading interesting topics, ignoring major discussions, if something looks odd only then sharing opinions). I like this forum because I can express me when I feel I need to.
With that being said, OP is not looking an honest member.
Bro thinks he owns the house. He talk nonsense and thinks everyone will nod with his nonsense. But when bro realize he does not have an influence of a janitor he calls others a fool and crybaby. Bro mind your own business. Bye bye.
What are the possibility that the topic creator account and our bro is the same person? Otherwise it does not go into my head that why our bro is so desperate to prove the house is wrong and receive the cheated chips.
What are the possibility that the topic creator account and our bro is the same person? Otherwise it does not go into my head that why our bro is so desperate to prove the house is wrong and receive the cheated chips.
# Author Posts User Page View Posts
1 popek1990 14 View View
2 AHOYBRAUSE 11 View View
3 Free Market Capitalist 10 View View
4 alani123 6 View View
It's understandable the topic creator is angry and helping his own emotion but why the other two are as emotional as the OP?
There must be something else going behind the public conversation.
These two users want to prove a point that does not even exists. It's like everyone else know nothing about poker and the game, only these two know it all. When they are out of words they are insulting you. Something is not write with them.
1 popek1990 14 View View
2 AHOYBRAUSE 11 View View
3 Free Market Capitalist 10 View View
4 alani123 6 View View
It's understandable the topic creator is angry and helping his own emotion but why the other two are as emotional as the OP?
There must be something else going behind the public conversation.
These two users want to prove a point that does not even exists. It's like everyone else know nothing about poker and the game, only these two know it all. When they are out of words they are insulting you. Something is not write with them.
PS
If you are interested I am willing to sell you my old socks with a special discount.
Looks like your socks do not have a market demand however if that was a peer of socks of Lionel Messi then I am sure it would bid for a few thousands to a million (we don't know but it definitely would have a good value than a gram of gold).If you are interested I am willing to sell you my old socks with a special discount.
If these players are all the same person, then it would make no sense to go all in against yourself, as the goal is to get chips from other players.
The accounts will go all against each others when there are no more players left except the accounts.The strategy can be swapping chips between each others too to make other players weaker in chips.
All depends on the development but the first goal is always keeping all three accounts alive so that they can have the top finishing spots to maximize their profits.
nutildah is an idiot and you are a poker generous that is what you are saying.
I am not calling nutildah an idiot I am calling SWC Poker and idiot.
May I see your poker portfolio?
Sure. There you go.
I agree with nutildah's analysis. These three players always had information between them. When you know cards you can easily take advantage from others.
Your poker hand analysis skills must be similar to your reading comprehension skills.
You are over estimating yourself in the open forum, but you know less, have a little experience. You can convince amateurs or the members who have no knowledge about poker but to the people who know the game with good knowledge will laugh at you. You already made me laugh tbh.
You can reply this post but I don't continue conversation with uncivilized people. You need schooling first.
I have been in many tables like that, playing as popek1990, for more than a decade playing poker every day and I have never been accused of collusion, but I played in serious houses, like Pokerstars (also Pacific and others for short periods of time).
nutildah is an idiot and you are a poker generous that is what you are saying. May I see your poker portfolio?I agree with nutildah's analysis. These three hand always had information between them. When you know cards you can easily take advantage from others.
Re: Is Saint-loup cheating LiveCasino.io signature campaign? What do you think?
If he has been here for 8 years, has that being his style of posting or it's just a recent occurrence?
Re: Best ANN Threads on Bitcointalk? Looking for Inspiration
Probably the best solution (even if not the cheapest) could be to reach a designer or a campaign manager.
I would suggest to reach @icopress https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137579
since he has a very strong reputation, expert on gambling promotion, and has always been able to provide an impressive level of quality .
He recently lost a few projects including bc.games. There must be something about him which is not going well. I would suggest to reach @icopress https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=1137579
since he has a very strong reputation, expert on gambling promotion, and has always been able to provide an impressive level of quality .
I will suggest OP to find the topic how to advertise your casino on Bitcointalk and then make up his mind. None of these manager is less reputable than anyone. ultraBTC need to find one for himself.
I don’t think he is clever because he doesn’t understand the current situation on a campaign.
His social skill is low ofc. It's common sense, everyone will be annoyed and his chance to be accepted in any of the campaign will be likely zero. This is an act that makes no sense.Unless anyone has evidence I threatened this wackjob with law enforcement, or am deleting important posts, please post within three days or I will lock topic. I then suggest bitcoingirl.club continue his attacks on his moderated thread or back his words up with legal action, as I am. (Not action against you, wackjob - I hope no one took you seriously)
May be I am wrong but I am certainly sure in one post you wanted to know his identity and asked about it in the post. Have you received any information about him from anyone yet?im not doing a video verification. The rest i have sent no answers till now
If they require a video verification then unfortunately that's the route you have to go through otherwise they have their rights to reject you and you can not do much too.Re: Want to create an exchange, with BTC and XMR as primary ones
You might consider some kind of partnership or use the API of eXch.net
A new manager will take control of eXch in the end of month, so there might be some new opportunities there.
I thought exch is shutting down for good. It's a good news tbhA new manager will take control of eXch in the end of month, so there might be some new opportunities there.
You should've watched your tounge, he can anytime now leave his boob and pick up [red/black] paint, anytime now...
If I were you, I would've logged out of the account, deleted the info, and never looked back...
How can it hurts someone's feeling?If I were you, I would've logged out of the account, deleted the info, and never looked back...