Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 91 results by dumpsterhawk
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: If you had infinite money, would you still gamble?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:47:17 UTC
Never. If you are stupid enough to gamble at that point, you deserve to bankrupt yourself. Money that you earn easily is also spent and wasted easily. An infinite money glitch would be a jackpot on steroids. You would not care so much if you should spend it on something or not. Combine this with gambling where money is lost fast and emotions are high, and you have a recipe for disaster. Instead of helping people in need, you would be losing thousands or even hundreds of thousands depending on how much your glitch is generating. You don't even feel good from this gambling, but you continue to do it and lose money.
It is actually very true that people easily spend money that is earned easily. And when a gambler loses money, he becomes aggressive and at some point he loses control over himself and becomes addicted to gambling. Gambling is more about how the gambler controls himself than it is about where the money comes from. When a person loses control of himself, he cannot think of helping others because then he is lost in another world.
You can see this easy with lottery winners as the best examples, but it also happens with relatively smaller wins in casinos. I've seen people win $200k at slots and waste it even if it was a big amount of money to them. I've also seen people win $200k and then continue to bet it hoping for a bigger score only to lose it all again fast. It is a very dangerous combination, easy money and a place where it is easily spent or wasted.
Yes. I have seen it, how a gambler lost money that he had won easily. Faced with this dangerous situation, the gambler gambled until he lost everything and went bankrupt, and at some point he understood the meaning of money. Gambling gives many gamblers the opportunity to change their luck by winning big, but most gamblers cannot keep the money that changes their luck, succumbing to excessive self-belief and greed. Therefore, every gambler should always think about trying to keep themselves safe from anything that seems dangerous.
Now compare this to money that is hard to earn. Do you see a very hard worker wasting his money or making good use of it? In a way we can also consider easy money as cursed. A lot of people do bad things after they get money this way. It is pretty dangerous.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Are online Casinos more rigged than physical Casinos like in Las Vegas?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:32:38 UTC
so as I been gambling online for a while sometimes I wonder like would it be better off walking into a real casino like in Vegas!
at least in real casino you see the dealer, the wheel, dice, the cash
like there is some transparency on other hand the online it is all code and you have to trust the software and hope the site not screwing with you

what do u think curious to hear from people who have done both
Though gamblers may think online casinos are the most rigged when compared to physical casinos, due to it's outcome been a product of random algorithm, but to be frankly speaking, the truth of the fact is that these two types of casinos are designed to maximize profit.
If the algorithm is provably fair, then it can not be something that is rigged. Either the casino follows the algorithm or it is rigged, but not both.

Which also means that your chance of winning will always be limited than your chances of losing each bet. And as such as a gambler, it's only best to understand that lose is part of gambling, and luck always plays an important role to the success of any gambler. Because switching to gambling on a physical casino wouldn't stop you from losing, because if it was possible, then every citizen in Las Vegas who has access to physical casinos would have all been millionaires by today. But it's sad they are not, and that comes to a conclusion that luck plays an important role in the success of every gambler.
In fact even reputable casinos tend to rig their games, which is not the case with online casinos. Educated online gamblers would ask the casino to prove ways to prove that they game is random and not manipulated. Playing at casinos which have these features ensure that at least the outcome of the games are fair. Still the casino can do manipulations and complicate your life when you try to withdraw those winnings. That's why it is best to play a provably fair and reputable online casinos only.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Visited physical casinos to have real life experience and guess what?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:30:19 UTC

What is your thoughts.. do you think both are the same or physical casinos are more transparent than the online casinos? Let discussion wisely.
I don't think there is any different between the physical Casino and the online.  The only difference is the location, privacy and fun. The online casino you Play it online at your convenience and privacy while at home. And the physical casino is a Casino people go to have fun while playing. But apart from this few difference both of them are thesame in terms of software programs. Let take for example the sport betting app on your phone is thesame thing as the physical sport bet shop. Only that you need to fund your online account to play online while you need to pay cash to the physical agent for offline betting, but still everything is thesame expecialy the programming. So there is no much different except for the fun and privacy.
You should do some research because there is a big difference. Many online casinos are provably fair at least the good ones are. Physical casinos are not provably fair and they game the machines and you have no way to prove it. Do not be a fool that it getting cheated by idiots who own the casino.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Is Bitcoin just for the rich?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:23:51 UTC
Of course it is not for the rich. Just because you were too dumb to recognize the value of Bitcoin when it was cheap, that does not make it a thing for the rich now. Bitcoin can be divided into small fractions. If we also had 1 billion dollar bills, would you ask if USD is only for the rich?
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Before You Think of Giving Up on Crypto, Read This
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:18:03 UTC
1) Losses are part of the game. Losing your money doesn’t mean you are a failure, It means you’ve learned something, if you take time to understand why the lose happened in the first place.
Stay away from shitcoins and you won't have losses. That is even a simpler lesson for your first point.  Wink
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: If you had infinite money, would you still gamble?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 20:02:15 UTC
Never. If you are stupid enough to gamble at that point, you deserve to bankrupt yourself. Money that you earn easily is also spent and wasted easily. An infinite money glitch would be a jackpot on steroids. You would not care so much if you should spend it on something or not. Combine this with gambling where money is lost fast and emotions are high, and you have a recipe for disaster. Instead of helping people in need, you would be losing thousands or even hundreds of thousands depending on how much your glitch is generating. You don't even feel good from this gambling, but you continue to do it and lose money.
It is actually very true that people easily spend money that is earned easily. And when a gambler loses money, he becomes aggressive and at some point he loses control over himself and becomes addicted to gambling. Gambling is more about how the gambler controls himself than it is about where the money comes from. When a person loses control of himself, he cannot think of helping others because then he is lost in another world.
You can see this easy with lottery winners as the best examples, but it also happens with relatively smaller wins in casinos. I've seen people win $200k at slots and waste it even if it was a big amount of money to them. I've also seen people win $200k and then continue to bet it hoping for a bigger score only to lose it all again fast. It is a very dangerous combination, easy money and a place where it is easily spent or wasted.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 14 years activating 80,000 BTC?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 18:54:55 UTC
I'll call it:

Saylor doing a private OTC buy.

Maybe we see this in an upcoming Microstrategy press release..
There is plenty of supply available in the OTC market, there is no need to activate a 14 year old address for this. Really why do people keep coming up with random theories that make no sense. For this case I've seen everything from Roger Ver to hacks and now even Saylor.

Just relax poor man and take a deep breath, you need it.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: If you had infinite money, would you still gamble?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 17:41:34 UTC
Never. If you are stupid enough to gamble at that point, you deserve to bankrupt yourself. Money that you earn easily is also spent and wasted easily. An infinite money glitch would be a jackpot on steroids. You would not care so much if you should spend it on something or not. Combine this with gambling where money is lost fast and emotions are high, and you have a recipe for disaster. Instead of helping people in need, you would be losing thousands or even hundreds of thousands depending on how much your glitch is generating. You don't even feel good from this gambling, but you continue to do it and lose money.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 14 years activating 80,000 BTC?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 17:31:23 UTC
Those who are genuine holders have basically been holding for a long time, for a decade or more than a century, they have not thought about selling Bitcoin since the past. That is why they have been able to sustain their Bitcoin investment until the present. If 14 years is a huge time for normal holders, then those who are genuine holders are basically ready to keep Bitcoin for a longer period, I think such genuine holders exist in WO thread.
However, I think it is necessary for them to keep Bitcoin for a longer period, because the money they have can give luxury to life for a short time. But holding this huge wealth for the future will be much better and the future will be sure. This is the best way to be financially successful.

Idk man, I mean i totally agree with the holding and thst he would make more if he held longer. 14 years is truly commendable. But isn't 8 Billy enough? I mean shit man, I think I'd be good with just 1 mil haha I am just a mere simpleton though in comparison 😅.  My family and I could be doing pretty darn well with even half that or a quarter of that led alone 8 bil
It is not enough. You only think like that because you are poor. If you have 1 million, you will see why 1 million isn't enough. Selling Bitcoin for so low is very stupid. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity, and holding 14 years is a minimum.  Smiley
Hey jack ass, I said 8 billion would be enough and followed up with the fact I would be happy to just have 1 million right now. Everyone's situation is different. I would call your attitude poor. Richness is a mindset and your mind is obviously where your name is, in the trash!  Get your shit together and stop being an A hole Smiley
You took personally what I wrote when I merely wrote facts  Huh A poor person can't understand why a big number is not enough. Wealth is very relative. Is a poor person going to make multi billion dollar business deals? No. Because of that they simply are unable to comprehend this. To understand, you must first have the wealth in question. If you ever reach 1 million, try to remember my post and you will see how poor you are with 1 million after you have it.  Cheesy
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: 14 years activating 80,000 BTC?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 16:46:53 UTC
Those who are genuine holders have basically been holding for a long time, for a decade or more than a century, they have not thought about selling Bitcoin since the past. That is why they have been able to sustain their Bitcoin investment until the present. If 14 years is a huge time for normal holders, then those who are genuine holders are basically ready to keep Bitcoin for a longer period, I think such genuine holders exist in WO thread.
However, I think it is necessary for them to keep Bitcoin for a longer period, because the money they have can give luxury to life for a short time. But holding this huge wealth for the future will be much better and the future will be sure. This is the best way to be financially successful.

Idk man, I mean i totally agree with the holding and thst he would make more if he held longer. 14 years is truly commendable. But isn't 8 Billy enough? I mean shit man, I think I'd be good with just 1 mil haha I am just a mere simpleton though in comparison 😅.  My family and I could be doing pretty darn well with even half that or a quarter of that led alone 8 bil
It is not enough. You only think like that because you are poor. If you have 1 million, you will see why 1 million isn't enough. Selling Bitcoin for so low is very stupid. This is a once in a lifetime opportunity, and holding 14 years is a minimum.  Smiley
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: Visited physical casinos to have real life experience and guess what?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 16:43:41 UTC
A lot of casinos have very high house edges, others are randomly rigging games for random periods of time. It is next to impossible to prove that they are doing this. I always hated these physical machines, and thought that they only exist to scam people out of money. A fair casino must give you a good chance at winning, sometimes people even win big using free credits that they get online.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: Bitcoin Developers float proposal to freeze Quantum computers.
by
dumpsterhawk
on 19/07/2025, 16:41:54 UTC
It is also true that it's entirely theoretical for now. Anyone saying it's a current threat is either uninformed or has ulterior motivations.
While it is good to invest time early into creating defense mechanisms for this, you are fully correct. Anyone who is sounding the alarm bells is just creating FUD. I think we will see many more proposals before we get even a little bit close to some solutions.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: right bankroll management keep you in check
by
dumpsterhawk
on 16/07/2025, 03:10:49 UTC
Discipline is the watch word for any one who is ready to be free from falling victim of becoming a gambling addict because some times people set up ump realistic targets like getting a gambling limit but ends up gambling the more this is because there is no strong gambling discipline
Discipline is absolutely everything here. It does not matter whether you are winning or losing, without discipline you are doomed. If you are losing hard, you may want to bet more to try to recover your losses. If you are winning, you may want to double your winnings to make it even more fantastic. It often works out quite badly in both such cases. This is why discipline is vital for keeping your gambling in check, regardless of what happens.
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [XMR] Monero - A secure, private, untraceable cryptocurrency
by
dumpsterhawk
on 16/07/2025, 03:06:39 UTC
Has anyone seen some drama about a potential 51% attack these days? I've read something on reddit that a mining pool had more than that amount of hashrate, but I am not sure if the data is correct.

Proton.me: "We will be adding Monero as a payment option for our VPN plans by the end of Summer 2025. Source: https://x.com/davidgpeterson/status/1941500514803548636"
https://protonmail.uservoice.com/forums/935538-accounts-payments/suggestions/33188971-monero-payment-option
Excellent, this is a must have for any service provider that claims to protect privacy.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: IMF strikes once again
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 17:48:20 UTC
It is time for Pakistan to take the high way and stop being ruled by the IMF. This is nothing more than the continuation of colonialism and the sabotage of developing nations.

Not saying they're necessarily evil. They do have a duty to warn and advise when a country is seemingly committing economic seppuke but I don't get the fear behind PK's move (if true). There are far bigger problems they need to solve on the ground. PK may have a power surplus but they need to fix their regional grids. Ask any Pakistani if they have ever went through an entire year without power cuts.
They are evil, and people who believe otherwise are very naive. They don't have a duty to create wealth for your country, they have a duty to create wealth for themselves.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: right bankroll management keep you in check
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 17:45:44 UTC
Have you ever noticed how, even when you think you're managing your bankroll well, you still end up chasing losses, and instead of recovering, you dig a deeper hole? That's usually a sign that your bankroll management isn't as solid as you thought.
The truth of the fact is that in gambling there is nothing like the perfect bankroll, because inasmuch as you try to manage your bankroll, you will still always stand a chance of running into series of losing streaks, and as such, the next action you take is what matters most, rather than chasing for loses, because as a gambler who intends to manage his/her bankroll while gambling should always have a plan on how much he intends to wager either daily or at every gambling session. While secondly, it is also advisable such individual only deposit an amount they are willing to gamble away at each session or daily. Because inasmuch as you experience a series of losing streaks, you might be tempted to want to chase lose.
Nobody needs a perfect bankroll, you just need to stick to a bankroll that you create. The problem isn't the bankroll itself, but the person that decides to ignore it and create even bigger loses.
Post
Topic
Board Beginners & Help
Re: Advice regarding storing a Metal backup of a multisig with a bank vault
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 17:03:32 UTC
[...]
It is true that if text is clear on simple piece of metal X-ray might pick it up. However it is very unlikely this would actually happen. Your suggestion to use layered or jumbled metal pieces would make text unreadable airport X-rays are made to find dangerous items not these kind of tiny words and with so much luggage no one is looking for or would likely even spot such small details. And it is far too difficult for thieves to get our seed this way compared to other methods so unless our seed backup looks like weapon we are probably safe.
You are aware that in many airports in the world staff is actively doing robbery on luggage where possible? Items don't magically disappear from luggage by themselves. It is just a matter of time when people will start also looking for seed phrases where possible. It is better to be forward thinking and safe. If your coins get stolen, you will probably never get them back.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: right bankroll management keep you in check
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 15:02:15 UTC
Bankroll management is everything, but the key is to never break your limits. Forget any excuses like it is a special day or it will only be done this time and never again. If you break your playing limits even once, you are at a huge risk to repeat it and repeating it is always easier the more times you do it.

Chasing losses is already a sign of poor bankroll management because it does nothing than make you lose more and more.
You could say that there is no bankroll management involved at that point, because someone who manages their bankroll will never chase losses. These two things are not compatible.

Your percentage allocation per bet is high for slot games which you can do hundreds of bets within a short time. If you allocate 1% of your capital per bet, it will take on 100 spins for you to lose your capital if you are unlucky to win in those spins. For sports betting, such percentage is fine and considered a good bankroll mananegemt.
People often doubt that possibility of unlucky streaks, but it is quite possible and does happen.
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: The most stupid tool for criminals to use is Bitcoin
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 13:33:37 UTC
Who dares go to the bank and ask for a governer's bank account balance? But now we can know because BTC is open source and traceable, isn't Fiat the perfect one for crime than Bitcoin? With power you can be dirty with Fiat, but not Bitcoin, you will eventually be bursted.
This is not really true. You can track also fiat, it can just be hard depending on the setup but in many cases it is easy. An average criminal is not going to be able to set up offshore businesses and networks that make it hard to track the money and discover who is behind it. An average criminal can learn and start using Bitcoin very soon. As long as they don't do KYC, they can do a lot of things while hiding in the crowd so to speak.
Post
Topic
Board Gambling discussion
Re: How much risk is it worth taking?
by
dumpsterhawk
on 03/07/2025, 13:19:59 UTC
Agree to that, even a small chances of winning as long as you deal with it using your knowledge and skills there's a chance that it will happen, you just need to work with it and keep your focus, discipline and allowing yourself to enhance your knowledge from the experience that you gain in each gambling that you made, more on taking time and expanding and exploring with every opportunity that you may have.
There shouldn't be risks taking without careful analysis and knowledge of the indebt effect of that risk, this is very important to all to at least make our plans not to go beyond how far their can bear in terms of the risk, and if a gambler gamble with that line of thoughts, he will definitely be above every trouble waters that can come along with the risks and ending up with some great rewards in the end.
That sounds good but I think very few people do things that way. Have you see how people invest in crypto? They read 2 words somewhere and instantly buy something. Cheesy Knowing risk is probably not the same as understanding it, because people would not engage is extremely risky behavior that doesn't benefit them much.