Search content
Sort by

Showing 18 of 18 results by eck
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: More crap to deal with - Dwolla Reverses TradeHill Transactions
by
eck
on 26/07/2011, 00:41:47 UTC
So I understand that Dwolla deposits are disabled, but what about withdrawals? If I request a Dwolla withdrawal right now, will that be processed?
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [480 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, SQL, hop OK, 8decimals
by
eck
on 23/07/2011, 01:35:56 UTC
Yep, you were right - I was paid and it just took some time for it to show up. Thanks!
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [480 GH/s] Eligius pool: ~0Fee SMPPS, no reg, RollNtime, SQL, hop OK, 8decimals
by
eck
on 22/07/2011, 22:40:00 UTC
I've been mining NMC for the past few days, and I had something around a 1.40 BTC balance with Eligius (1KUvwJTZnb6cRSB6VpiWF9jEoMbLv6MeBD). That balance seems to have disappeared and it has not been paid - the stats no longer show anything for the address.
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: Official CGMINER thread - CPU/GPU miner in C for linux/windows/osx
by
eck
on 19/07/2011, 20:49:12 UTC
I'm running 2 6990s (both with the OC switch on the overclocked position, but no further OCing) on a single-core Sempron 140. With cgminer, one card gets the expected performance, but the other one is incredibly low (40-50Mhash per GPU). I'm using an intensity of 9 as suggested in the original post for 6990s.

This is the exit output:

 GPU 0: [395.7 Mh/s] [Q:91  A:85  R:3  HW:0  E:93%  U:5.55/m]
 GPU 1: [395.6 Mh/s] [Q:92  A:96  R:1  HW:0  E:104%  U:6.20/m]
 GPU 2: [39.4 Mh/s] [Q:12  A:5  R:0  HW:0  E:42%  U:3.13/m]
 GPU 3: [46.4 Mh/s] [Q:13  A:10  R:0  HW:0  E:83%  U:5.95/m]
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: This should be kept secret! !!!!!!!!!!!!
by
eck
on 01/07/2011, 00:03:57 UTC
The early adopters deserve their fortune. They took on the risk back when Bitcoin was new and when its future wasn't clear. In this case, their investments (mining hardware and/or money, time) paid off, but it could've gone either way.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [170Gh/s+] Bitcoins.lc - Finally a usuable Bitcoin Pool! (EU, IPv6, 0% fee, LP)
by
eck
on 12/06/2011, 15:37:11 UTC
FYI you may want to properly disable registration. Smiley You can still register using the Google cached page.
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: New CPU&GPU Miner [beta-testing] +30% effeciency
by
eck
on 03/06/2011, 19:25:44 UTC
Yep, I can confirm what everyone else is saying.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: [~540 Gh/s Mining Pool] INSTANT PAYOUT,+1% with LP! +0.8% for no failed blocks!
by
eck
on 12/05/2011, 16:00:33 UTC
Yep, site + pool seems to be down.
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll support)
by
eck
on 12/05/2011, 15:58:05 UTC
580 gets 127-130 mhash/sec at stock clocks with rpcminer-cuda on default settings under Windows 7 x64 (only one card so no SLI issues). 5850 gets somewhere around 240 mhash/sec or possibly more with the latest miners (I'm going off the wiki on this).
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: Official DiabloMiner GPU Miner Thread (now with Long Poll support)
by
eck
on 12/05/2011, 14:02:20 UTC
a 5850 gets more mhash/s than a 580. There really isn't an nvidia equivalent.
Post
Topic
Board Pools
Re: Please test: New Experimental Pool "Eligius"
by
eck
on 09/05/2011, 19:43:08 UTC
I just started mining on this pool a day ago with a 6990.

I noticed this in the balance file for my wallet ID:
{"earned":74171106,"paid":158675263,"balance":1425378}

I have indeed been paid $1.58. I'm not quite sure what the earned parameter means however. I thought it would be paid+balance, but it doesn't appear to be.

Also, when Bitcoin says it matures in X more blocks - does that mean it matures when ANYONE creates X more blocks or when the pool does?

Thanks!

eck
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: ATI Video Cards... Series 5 vs Series 6
by
eck
on 09/05/2011, 02:16:48 UTC
That seems really high, considering the 6990s are $730 new at Newegg.
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: Setting up an Ubuntu 10.10 miner - should I go 32 or 64 bit?
by
eck
on 07/05/2011, 21:52:19 UTC
why would that be? I've been using it and haven't had any issues, but if 10.10 is going to give me better performance or something, I'd rather go with that.
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: Setting up an Ubuntu 10.10 miner - should I go 32 or 64 bit?
by
eck
on 07/05/2011, 20:08:57 UTC
Also, why 10.10 and not 11.04?
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: Ubuntu Server mining with ATI?
by
eck
on 07/05/2011, 05:22:19 UTC
I'm running Ubuntu Server 11.04 headless with a 6990. There's no need to auto-login or anything.

You do need to be running X and some kind of desktop environment or window manager, however. (I installed Xfce but something else should work too.) After that, just aticonfig and restart and install the APP SDK which should detect the GPUs.
Post
Topic
Board Trading Discussion
Re: MTGox vs mysterious Russia
by
eck
on 03/05/2011, 03:21:50 UTC
Blocking an entire country won't do much... if the attack is larger than your uplink speed, you can block it with iptables or whatever all you want. It won't have any effect. ISPs that specifically offer DDoS protection have specialized (and very expensive) DDoS mitigation appliances that filter out the traffic before it even hits the box.
Post
Topic
Board Mining (Altcoins)
Re: Cuda Drivers?
by
eck
on 03/05/2011, 01:46:16 UTC
On Windows CUDA is included with the drivers... I don't have the CUDA toolkit installed and I can use rpcminer-cuda with no problems. Under Linux, the CUDA toolkit is indeed required.
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: Ufasoft Miner Thread - SSE2-optimized for Intel CPUs, version 0.8 (2011-April)
by
eck
on 01/05/2011, 16:41:50 UTC
Having some trouble compiling this on Ubuntu 11.04 x64:

Code:
jwasm -DX64=1 -10 -elf64 -zcw -c -Fosha256sse.o sha256sse.asm
JWasm v2.05, Mar  2 2011, Masm-compatible assembler.
Portions Copyright (c) 1992-2002 Sybase, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Source code is available under the Sybase Open Watcom Public License.

sha256sse.asm(48) : Error A2091: Language type must be specified
sha256sse.asm(314) : Error A2142: Unmatched block nesting: CalcSha256Sse
sha256sse.asm: 316 lines, 1 passes, 0 ms, 0 warnings, 2 errors
make: *** [sha256sse.o] Error 1

I checked the sha256sse.asm file and found that a language type was declared on x86, but not on x64. I removed the if statement, and did the same on the other ASM file, which allows it to compile but then I get "error 80004001" if I try to use it. Obviously the language type isn't declared on x64 for a reason, but I'm just not certain what it should be on x64 (since it obviously has to be something).

This also happened with the latest version of JWASM - I'm using the older one since that's what most others here are using though.

Thanks in advance!