We have looked at all our update history and have come to the following conclusions:

- The signature campaign has always had 6 rules. The image (screenshot) below which you claim to be your proof has got just 5 rules with the 5th rule missing. I think the reason for this could be that your browser did not load the individual image slice rule 5 (we slice up the images to adequately add links to them) or your proof has been deliberately doctored. In any case, there is a 5th rule missing.

- We found in our logs that the 5th rule was indeed updated by our team but the update did not change the fact that signature participants are required to send reports. Image 1 below is the initial rule, while image 2 is the updated rule. Clearly, you can see that both rules require reports. At no time, was there no need to send reports.

- We acknowledge that many bounties do not require signature participants to send reports, but we chose differently and based on the team’s requirement.

- The general rule expressly states that all participants must post reports. The format of reports was further defined in each campaign section.

- We have conversed with some of the signature participants and they acknowledge the oversight on their part and our team has plans to provide some reward to those how have proven that they participated despite failure to follow the rules.

- We are not saying you did not participate in the campaign, however, you failed to follow the rule defined for this Bounty.

- You may choose to start a smear campaign or discuss with our admins on ways we can help you. But, we will not be forced to act due to threats and false evidence.

Thank you.

Reserved

Reserved

New Announcement : 📯

Airdrop Distribution 🎁
Further development 📊
IEO Status 🧧
Bounty Status 💻

All discussed in our latest update. Read Here

Pre-IEO is still on   Join here

Pre-IEO is still on   Join here

To clarify our value proposition, Ellcrys' goal is not to connect different blockchains together but to connect software development collaborators building decentrally governed products and services under a protocol that allows them to share ownership and contribute without censorship. There are other protocols working to enable interoperability between blockchains (e.g Cosmos) - Ellcrys is not one of them. In the future, when there is a globally accepted standard for blockchain interoperability, Ellcrys will leverage on such a standard to connect with not just other blockchains but collaboration and DAO protocols.

Absolutely. We are building a software collaboration engine that will provide developers with the ability to create any kind of application from anywhere in the world. With the biggest advantage being that they never have to worry about censorship, outages and platform lock-in. Our team is focused on creating not just the protocol but also the tools that make using the protocol a fast, convenient and simple experience.

Ellcrys is primarily a blockchain for creating decentralized organisations that are focused on creating open, transparent and multi-owned software products. These products can be dApps, web sites, web applications and APIs, mobile applications, libraries/packages and more. We first provide a decentralized code sharing and collaboration system that allows people to start, join and contribute to projects without fear of censorship. Ellcrys will allow thousands of people share ownership of 100% of any kind of application and participate in the governance process that determines how the applications are created, updated, executed, marketed, monetized and acquired. While Ellcrys will offer a dApp system, it is more than a virtual machine for blockchain applications.

I think the major difference between Ellcrys and its competitors is that we are building a protocol that understands collaboration natively. A protocol that defines how software is owned - platforms of today cannot do this without depending on a central authority - and allows thousands to manage that software. When we launch, collaborators will be able to build decentralized and centralized applications that are primarily governed from the blockchain.

Our consensus system is based on BitcoinNG which allows the network to process transactions at a scale similar to visa. Waves blockchain has already implemented BitcoinNG and is currently one of the fastest blockchains in the industry.

We are currently in advanced talks with exchanges with volume above $1B. I am unable to disclose their names until we officially reach agreement in July.

Feel free to read our whitepaper for a more detail breakdown of our protocol.
You can also check out our protocol page on our website.
We have released v0.1 of our protocol. We still have more work to do but you can join the test network today. Click here to get started.

We have no control over the Bitcointalk account that posted the previous Bitcointalk thread and the information contained is now stale and no longer relevant to Ellcrys of today.
As you can see, we are now posting with our official account and we can update the thread as we evolve.

Yes, having a long history helps the team understand the industry better and also improves people and investors confidence. We have been around since 2017 researching, developing and collecting feedback. We have stayed through the bear market and have been consistently developing the protocol and product suite. You can check out our GitHub to see how far we have gone and if you are interested in taking things for a spin, head over to our Getting Started guide to download our clients and join our test network.

We had a rebrand in 2018. However, our project management remains unchanged.

Sure, we raised a total of $300,000 from the pre-sale round. After that round, we spent the next months developing the project. Our current line of products and testnet is a result of our efficient capital prudence.  
We have always had one website, it is just better structured than the early days.
We are definitely interested in conducting the IEO in larger exchanges. While I am unable to mention the exchanges we are working with, we prefer exchanges with real volume above $1B.

Cheers