Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 22 results by enjolras
when can we get update when new coin is here so i can solo mine 
? like a discord or what ever or twitter etc..
? like a discord or what ever or twitter etc..Maybe a Telegram group/channel?
we need more information? for what this project is.
that's all I might say.
that's all I might say.
Why not just for fun? After all... what's the ACTUAL use of COIN?
A couple of things.
Regarding the pool, there are still some fractions of the coin remaining to be payed. The payment threshold was 1 TRV, and those bits are less than that, but they are yours anyway, so I have payed it by hand.
Regarding the new chain, I will probably not mine, as my capacity only allows for very poor CPU mining, so I'm not going into discussing the new algo. I confirm that I will setup the pool again as soon as the new chain is available. In the "old" chain there were 10,000 PoW blocks, so there should be a premine of, at least, 500,000 of the new coins for the swap. I guess that we can agree that some premine for the developer is also expected and deserved. I'm not asking for a bounty for running the pool, I did it just because the coin looked so "innocent", not trying to say that it will be the next bitcoin and that it will finish all the diseases in the world, that I was happy to make my little contribution to the fun. Anyway, if you decide to give out some tips for the "pooler" I will not protest, either
Now let's wait for the algo discussion and the dev's news.
Cheers!
Wow after reading development for this project i am excited. A new chain will be born. Great!
I am kinda new to mining. Is it easy to migrate to new chain? There will be no loss coin right? And also there will be some time to swap right? Like in a period a week or so.
I wish the new algo is equihash for new chain cause it is gpu friendly.
edited : what is wrong with the pool is it offline??
I am kinda new to mining. Is it easy to migrate to new chain? There will be no loss coin right? And also there will be some time to swap right? Like in a period a week or so.
I wish the new algo is equihash for new chain cause it is gpu friendly.
edited : what is wrong with the pool is it offline??
The pool is offline because all PoW blocks have been already mined. Will be back online if a new chain is started, hopefully without the 100 confirmations bug, so everything will be stable.
BTW, I'm totally for a new chain and a coin swap. Will help as much as I can with nodes, the pool, etc.
Best regards!
Update on the pool:
The problem: due to a (possible) bug in the wallet, when the pool sends payments to miners it tries to use unconfirmed coins instead of the already confirmed ones, the pool sees it as a failed payment and sends it again, most of the time succesfully. Some time after that, the first payment transaction passes succesfully and that leads to a double payment to the miner, which won't go through because lack of funds unless the wallet remains funded (I spent 800 of my own coins yesterday dealing with it, thinking that having a buffer ammount would mitigate the problem, but it didn't).
The workaround: I have modified the pool code so when a payment transaction fails it won't be sent again, knowning that sooner or later it will get eventually confirmed.
The solution: fixing the bug in the wallet would do it, but not having the sources renders that impossible to me, so it is up to the dev.
I would say that using the pool is mostly safe at this point, but keep in mind that I am using an untested workaround and that miners COULD LOSE all their mined coins if the workaround doesn't do what is expected. So, understand that the pool should be considered as testing and that you mine at your own risk. That said, payments are being processed normally AT THIS MOMENT, but can't assure what will happen in the next hours.
Cheers!
@DEV:
Please take a look at this: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/issues/17
I'm pretty sure that the bug is present in this coin, and is driving my testing pool crazy, as it fails for that very reason everytime payments are due.
Will stop the pool until you can investigate it, as making payouts by hand for hours doesn't look like the brightest idea. Will be back once the problem is solved.
Thanks!
Please take a look at this: https://github.com/digibyte/digibyte/issues/17
I'm pretty sure that the bug is present in this coin, and is driving my testing pool crazy, as it fails for that very reason everytime payments are due.
Will stop the pool until you can investigate it, as making payouts by hand for hours doesn't look like the brightest idea. Will be back once the problem is solved.
Thanks!
Just to make it clear, if you are mining on the pool that I announced earlier. I am testing it and payments, among other things, are acting really weird. You could LOSE all your mined coins. It's not that I want to steal your coins, but the pool at this moment is not reliable at all. Keep mining at your own risk.
The pool looks better now. Let's see how it goes. Sorry for the inconvenience.
Thanks, good work!I will stop the pool again. Payments still acting weird. Some payments went through twice and others are failing. Will let you know when it is ready. Sorry about it.
Your pool is offline
Payments are not getting processed. Fixing it. Give me a few minutes. Sorry... it's my first pool ever.
Mining pool: pool . trevonpool . tk
Donations if you wish to help keeping the pool up in the future:
TRV: TFLzuBTcGzhLqJyZE2BPkWRzJKzBTy66Ge
BTC: 1Dse7114qLoRQbLoftbHp7wi5cRY7LxwWX
Enjoy!
Hi! Need more diff for asic - 32K and 64KDonations if you wish to help keeping the pool up in the future:
TRV: TFLzuBTcGzhLqJyZE2BPkWRzJKzBTy66Ge
BTC: 1Dse7114qLoRQbLoftbHp7wi5cRY7LxwWX
Enjoy!
You got it.
Cheers!
Mining pool: pool . trevonpool . tk
Just to make it clear, if you are mining on the pool. I am testing it and payments, among other things, are acting really weird. You could LOSE all your mined coins. It's not that I want to steal your coins, but the pool at this moment is not reliable at all. Keep mining at your own risk.
Donations if you wish to help keeping the pool up in the future:
TRV: TFLzuBTcGzhLqJyZE2BPkWRzJKzBTy66Ge
BTC: 1Dse7114qLoRQbLoftbHp7wi5cRY7LxwWX
Enjoy!
Just to make it clear, if you are mining on the pool. I am testing it and payments, among other things, are acting really weird. You could LOSE all your mined coins. It's not that I want to steal your coins, but the pool at this moment is not reliable at all. Keep mining at your own risk.
Donations if you wish to help keeping the pool up in the future:
TRV: TFLzuBTcGzhLqJyZE2BPkWRzJKzBTy66Ge
BTC: 1Dse7114qLoRQbLoftbHp7wi5cRY7LxwWX
Enjoy!
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
Waiting for ~0.0053 and no payout.
The payout just came in to my wallet. Case closed
Re: █▓▒░-< [ZPOOL.CA][HashTap™][FlexFee™] The miners multipool >-░▒▓█
My Payout is missing too 😟
+1
Waiting for ~0.0053 and no payout.
Can anyone comment on when difficulty will readjust? I heard the Bcash devs adjusted the difficulty algorithm, but I'm too much of a layman to see it in the code. 3 hours without a block -- ouch.
I think things will look much more interesting once difficulty readjusts on Bcash. Then it'll be "business as usual" on both chains, and we can see a more efficient market develop. For now, these illiquid markets don't mean much.
I think things will look much more interesting once difficulty readjusts on Bcash. Then it'll be "business as usual" on both chains, and we can see a more efficient market develop. For now, these illiquid markets don't mean much.
Apart from BTC regular readjustment every 2 weeks, they added some code so difficulty will be reduced by 20% if there are not 6 blocks solved in the last 12 hours. It's better explained here: https://steemit.com/bitcoin/@boxxa/bitcoin-cash-difficulty-error
Regards
Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return
This is due to two factors:
1. Dev funds added to a change address during testing phases will be used when
the game pays out although obviously will not be tracked by the main address,
although will still be used by the system to payout, this sometimes means the main
address will have more than is stated on the website although if you manually added
all of the values you would see the balance displayed on Nine9.ninja is the correct value.
2. Miner fees, the default tx miner fee is set to 0.00005 on the bitcoin wallet although
the game has a default set tx miner fee of 0.0001 (double), you may now think this is
unfair as the game will likely have more left over BTC due to the system using half the
actual game stated tx fee. This is incorrect as the majority of deposits to the system
are very low therefore when larger deposits are to be paid out the fees get very high
as the transactions are full of very low (dust) style inputs so the game has to have a
higher fee to protect itself from being unable to pay due to a too high miner fee.
An example of the above is the payment of 1.25 BTC:
https://blockchain.info/tx/eaeaf632874cc2cd62aa7b0bc492d878b402b3032057971d2189423d265ff8c2
Note the fee is: 0.00032545 BTC
This is 3*+ the game set 0.001 fee although because most outputs are 0.00005 the
game managed to accumulate enough to fund this higher fee rate.
Another 2 examples:
https://blockchain.info/tx/7623cfdb5f439d22493865571bacd87b2e0f37994270ed8401bba84cebbccfea
https://blockchain.info/tx/b9dcc7fb5eb5fa3fd0395413c79f1b783170894b38341ea060c7b8cc528e5c3d
Therefore the balance shown on the Nine9.ninja website is accurate and is the one
players should follow if they want to keep track of the balance.
I will be correcting some of the dynamic scaling stall issues shortly.
Thanks for playing!
1. Dev funds added to a change address during testing phases will be used when
the game pays out although obviously will not be tracked by the main address,
although will still be used by the system to payout, this sometimes means the main
address will have more than is stated on the website although if you manually added
all of the values you would see the balance displayed on Nine9.ninja is the correct value.
2. Miner fees, the default tx miner fee is set to 0.00005 on the bitcoin wallet although
the game has a default set tx miner fee of 0.0001 (double), you may now think this is
unfair as the game will likely have more left over BTC due to the system using half the
actual game stated tx fee. This is incorrect as the majority of deposits to the system
are very low therefore when larger deposits are to be paid out the fees get very high
as the transactions are full of very low (dust) style inputs so the game has to have a
higher fee to protect itself from being unable to pay due to a too high miner fee.
An example of the above is the payment of 1.25 BTC:
https://blockchain.info/tx/eaeaf632874cc2cd62aa7b0bc492d878b402b3032057971d2189423d265ff8c2
Note the fee is: 0.00032545 BTC
This is 3*+ the game set 0.001 fee although because most outputs are 0.00005 the
game managed to accumulate enough to fund this higher fee rate.
Another 2 examples:
https://blockchain.info/tx/7623cfdb5f439d22493865571bacd87b2e0f37994270ed8401bba84cebbccfea
https://blockchain.info/tx/b9dcc7fb5eb5fa3fd0395413c79f1b783170894b38341ea060c7b8cc528e5c3d
Therefore the balance shown on the Nine9.ninja website is accurate and is the one
players should follow if they want to keep track of the balance.
I will be correcting some of the dynamic scaling stall issues shortly.
Thanks for playing!
Thanks to you for your great explanation!
Re: Nine9.ninja - [PonziGame] ★ 400+ BTC Input ★ Altcoins ► Automated ► 125% Return
Hi all,
I've been researching the transactions a bit and I've found some weird things. Let's take a look to the last 2 payed bets:
Second to last payment was to address 177uEkAc7WJjretMPUcAwkTBFnYQ7CENyQ. Looking at that transaction, we find that the funds came from addresses:
1Nine9uy8vZjZGoDZcKmFD71X77A2rSxuQ (deposit address)
1F6Tp1YTuMPzHQivhWgdhsxs5XPDUYx3tV ("change" address from a previous transaction)
and the outputs went to:
177uEkAc7WJjretMPUcAwkTBFnYQ7CENyQ (sender address)
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6 (site fee address)
...and...
12AumNDSqaV8SgooN7HBb2aph3itP98q3n ("change" address for the remaining coins)
Now, if we look at the last payed bet, to address 1Jv5FPjpYag3eyPsUurr2i42iEFrzCVoYA, the transaction shows that the inputs are:
12AumNDSqaV8SgooN7HBb2aph3itP98q3n (the same "change" address of the previous payment)
17SfVoQyFASqdmsVyJq1NVhEhX8hpozFUD (probably another "change" address)
and the outputs to:
1Jv5FPjpYag3eyPsUurr2i42iEFrzCVoYA (sender address)
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6 (site fee address)
...and...
1NzCZn2VVCSqVUXwsVzgn719WwMFn49SP2 (a new "change" address)
If then we look at the balance of that last "change" address, we find that, as of now, it is of 0.01692978 BTC, which means that there is enough balance to pay for any bet under that amount (counting the fee and so), yet lots of "payable" bets have expired.
I suspect that the site only keeps account of the balance available in the deposit address to compute the payments, but everytime a transaction is made, the remaining coins are going, by bitcoin's design, to "change" addresses belonging to the same wallet, and that coins are not being used to pay for the bets, which IMHO opinion is quite unfair and, in any case, not included in the game terms.
Thoughts?
I've been researching the transactions a bit and I've found some weird things. Let's take a look to the last 2 payed bets:
Second to last payment was to address 177uEkAc7WJjretMPUcAwkTBFnYQ7CENyQ. Looking at that transaction, we find that the funds came from addresses:
1Nine9uy8vZjZGoDZcKmFD71X77A2rSxuQ (deposit address)
1F6Tp1YTuMPzHQivhWgdhsxs5XPDUYx3tV ("change" address from a previous transaction)
and the outputs went to:
177uEkAc7WJjretMPUcAwkTBFnYQ7CENyQ (sender address)
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6 (site fee address)
...and...
12AumNDSqaV8SgooN7HBb2aph3itP98q3n ("change" address for the remaining coins)
Now, if we look at the last payed bet, to address 1Jv5FPjpYag3eyPsUurr2i42iEFrzCVoYA, the transaction shows that the inputs are:
12AumNDSqaV8SgooN7HBb2aph3itP98q3n (the same "change" address of the previous payment)
17SfVoQyFASqdmsVyJq1NVhEhX8hpozFUD (probably another "change" address)
and the outputs to:
1Jv5FPjpYag3eyPsUurr2i42iEFrzCVoYA (sender address)
1N9Fee2pbrXArtapVJERjkDG1jJtzxbAz6 (site fee address)
...and...
1NzCZn2VVCSqVUXwsVzgn719WwMFn49SP2 (a new "change" address)
If then we look at the balance of that last "change" address, we find that, as of now, it is of 0.01692978 BTC, which means that there is enough balance to pay for any bet under that amount (counting the fee and so), yet lots of "payable" bets have expired.
I suspect that the site only keeps account of the balance available in the deposit address to compute the payments, but everytime a transaction is made, the remaining coins are going, by bitcoin's design, to "change" addresses belonging to the same wallet, and that coins are not being used to pay for the bets, which IMHO opinion is quite unfair and, in any case, not included in the game terms.
Thoughts?
Didn't really lose there. Got all 50 payments from 1st investment and 36 from 2nd, so not all expected profit but not bad at all. Last night I was about to invest again when I saw anomalies in the payouts rate, so I didn't. 6 hours later they stopped paying and started showing fake TxIDs on my profile, so game over.