Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 36 results by erek
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Emerald - EMD, the new alt coin is launched!!
by
erek
on 17/06/2013, 01:33:25 UTC
when would this be on an exchange ?
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Emerald - EMD, the new alt coin is launched!!
by
erek
on 17/06/2013, 01:24:50 UTC
just curious, mines only 900, i was sitting for awhile without hitting a block
Post
Topic
Board Announcements (Altcoins)
Re: [ANN] Emerald - EMD, the new alt coin is launched!!
by
erek
on 17/06/2013, 00:29:26 UTC
what's your KH/s?
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: AMD Catalyst™ Control Center / AMD Vision™ Engine Control Center 11.8 Driver Pre
by
erek
on 02/08/2011, 01:09:43 UTC
is it possible to watch DVDs via Windows Media Player on Windows 7 with these drivers? with previous drivers I had problems... *lock ups*
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BitPonzi: GLBSE pyramid scheme!
by
erek
on 28/07/2011, 03:10:08 UTC
anyone makin good profit on this venture?
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Topic OP
AMD Catalyst™ Control Center / AMD Vision™ Engine Control Center 11.8 Driver Pre
by
erek
on 27/07/2011, 21:32:08 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Meta
Re: Ban Image Macros
by
erek
on 26/07/2011, 01:44:58 UTC
YOUR You're ALL CRAZY!!!!  Shocked

FTFY

Edit: Oh, wait, somebody already pointed that out. I didn't know they did because it was stuck in a fricking picture, which didn't load the first time I loaded the page. Picture Fail, shoulda used text.
how much you chargin for the signature space you got fer rent?
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Re: LQC (Liquid Coin) -- Another Virtual Currency to increase liquidity
by
erek
on 24/07/2011, 15:27:33 UTC
ahhh... no.

Quote
there seems to be a need for more than just 1 or 2 virtual currencies to help with liquidity in the markets...

the thrust of your argument post is this:

Quote
if we had more virtual currency options it would give hope and more speculation for high earnings due to very low difficulty from starting up...

which boils down to the usual IT'S NOT FAAIIIRRRR!!!

but it is.  you just weren't smart enough, on top of stuff enough, or courageous enough to take the risk and devote the time and effort.

neither was i.

but those who did deserve everything they get - and i'm quite content to ride their coattails.  why aren't you?
i am
Post
Topic
Board Altcoin Discussion
Topic OP
LQC (Liquid Coin) -- Another Virtual Currency to increase liquidity
by
erek
on 24/07/2011, 05:40:36 UTC
so with the ever increasing difficulty of BTC mining (starting to slow and perhaps may level off and eventually decrease,) and the less popular NMC mining situation (involving high difficulties lately driven by BTC hoppers trying to make a quick buck from massive drops in difficulty)  there seems to be a need for more than just 1 or 2 virtual currencies to help with liquidity in the markets...  if we had more virtual currency options it would give hope and more speculation for high earnings due to very low difficulty from starting up...


but the one variable that seems to be haunting is the massive hopping around which skyrockets the difficulty...


see: http://consciouseconomics.org/why-multiple-currencies-are-good-eco-science



I proposed creating the LQC or Liquid Coin for the sole purpose of increasing liquidity for all currencies based on some intuition
Post
Topic
Board Bitcoin Discussion
Re: BitPonzi: GLBSE pyramid scheme!
by
erek
on 23/07/2011, 15:50:33 UTC
did anyone make a decent return on this BitPonzi?
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: FPGA Bitstream Security Broken
by
erek
on 22/07/2011, 12:25:39 UTC
oh
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Topic OP
FPGA Bitstream Security Broken
by
erek
on 21/07/2011, 22:22:13 UTC
Researchers in Germany released a pair of papers documenting severe power analysis vulnerabilities in the bitstream encryption of multiple Xilinx FPGAs. The problem exposes products using FPGAs to cloning, hardware Trojan insertion, and reverse engineering. Unfortunately, there is no easy downloadable fix, as hardware changes are required. These papers are also a reminder that differential power analysis (DPA) remains a potent threat to unprotected hardware devices. On the FPGA front, only Actel seems to be tackling the DPA issue so far, although their FPGAs are much smaller than Xilinx's.


Slashdot @ http://it.slashdot.org/story/11/07/21/1753217/FPGA-Bitstream-Security-Broken


...could be bad news for FPGA miners alike...
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: further improved phatk OpenCL Kernel (> 3% increase) for Phoenix - 2011-07-17
by
erek
on 17/07/2011, 16:04:50 UTC
Solid increase equivalent to nearly 5MHz overclock w/ 2011-07-17

Catalyst 11.7 Early + SDK 2.5


905/340 GPU/VRAM clocks on (2x 6970s)

hitting 812+ MH/sec
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: further improved phatk OpenCL Kernel (> 2% increase) for Phoenix - 2011-07-11
by
erek
on 11/07/2011, 23:32:18 UTC
Download version 2011-07-11: http://www.mediafire.com/?k404b6lqn8vu6z6

This could be the last version, because there seems no more room for big jumps. I thought I could remove some more additions, but the OpenCL compiler does a better job than I Cheesy. This version is faster than all previous kernels (uses the least ALU OPs for 69XX and 58XX). Should also work with SDK 2.1. If it throws an error with 2.1, please post here and include the error message!

Thanks to all donators and your feedback!

Dia

This one seems to act rather strangely.

On 2011-07-06 I had a pretty consistent 360MHash/sec with little variation. With 2011-07-11 the card is varying dramatically between 355-363, and usually at the lower end of that. Overall it may be slightly slower.

The cards are 5850s clocked at 900/300, using 11.4 and SDK 2.4 on Linux.

I'm going to let it run a while longer.

Sorry, but this is still slower; my cards were running around 355MH/sec and even down to 350. Went back to 2011-07-06.

I totally disagree, each version for me has been getting faster and faster. 7-11-11 is the fastest, yet for me.
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: crap i finally find some 6990's in stock
by
erek
on 09/07/2011, 10:21:03 UTC
the site doesn't work for me
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: Catalyst 11.7 Preview Drivers - No Dummies or Bridges
by
erek
on 09/07/2011, 10:17:36 UTC
make sure you all disable ULPS when in CrossFire/X mode... and using anything like MSI Afterburner, because ULPS enabled (i think by default) tends to power off one of the cards in CrossFireX which will crash out the whole system when applying settings via apps like MSI Afterburner
Post
Topic
Board CPU/GPU Bitcoin mining hardware
Re: 6950s running hotter after thermal paste...wtf?
by
erek
on 09/07/2011, 10:12:03 UTC
i had the same problem with Arctic Silver Ceramique... my only solution was to use Arctic Cooling MX-4... just a drop on the core
Post
Topic
Board Mining software (miners)
Re: further improved phatk OpenCL Kernel (> 2% increase) for Phoenix - 2011-07-06
by
erek
on 07/07/2011, 21:40:20 UTC
808.6 MH/sec max now (up 1-2% at least) from 7-6-11 to 7-7-11
Post
Topic
Board Mining
Re: New scalable pipelined FPGA core for SHA-256 - any interest?
by
erek
on 06/07/2011, 01:44:59 UTC
I've got a Stratix IV dev board (the GX 230 model) that I'd try your code on.  It seems like the mining program is where more of the inefficiencies lie. I'm running @ 240MHZ and two cores and getting around 200-300 Mhash/second. 

Using OrphanGland's code and fpgaminer's mining program.

5grand...


did you try overclocking it to 500MHz that it supposedly supports?
Post
Topic
Board Archival
Re: Pictures of your mining rigs!
by
erek
on 04/07/2011, 23:10:49 UTC

Crossfire hurts your performance when mining. People use dummy plugs because they have no choice. When I had 4x crossfired it was constant problems.
I had no issues with performance. I used it because its easier than using dummy plugs and works just fine. I do my testing under windows which forces me to use those cables. Plus it looks much nicer and allows the person to have a high end gaming pc along with a great miner.  Plus the bridges dont cost me anything,  i wa getting 400mhahes/s from each card at 900core. Was it suppose to be higher?

I call BS on this one. It is very hard to believe that this 4x sandwich does 0.4 Ghps per core for more than 1 minute in a row. Maybe with exception of some weird setups with room refrigerated otherwise and even than it is highly doubtful.

Video on youtube or this is a fake.



i am running 2x 6970s @ 905MHz/170MHz gpu/vram respectively, and they push 401Mh/sec each...

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m56SfTZeuJo

[it may be a little hard to read]