Search content
Sort by
Showing 10 of 10 results by erentils
Re: [ANN][ICO] ONEPAY - Decentralized POS Solutions on the EOS Blockchain
Quote
Thanks for the replies.
I still think you should reveal your team before the crowdsale. How often have you given money to something without actually knowing who is building it?
While we see the benefit of releasing our identities, imagine the following two scenarios:
1. Before we have secured an attorney, we release our identities. It turns out that something we were doing did not comply with US securities laws or was some kind of SEC/FTC violation. We are forced to return anything we raised (be it 10 eth or 10000 eth). This leaves us at 0 Eth for all the time we spent promoting the ICO and doing marketing (we havent hired anyone for marketing, we do all of this ourselves currently). We may also face civil penalties.
2. We do not reveal our identities before the sale. We raise less eth than we would have (lets say we only raise 100 Eth). While we raised a small amount, compared to scenario one (where we raised nothing and might have been penalized by federal regulatory bodies), we are still 100 Eth ahead. This eth is enough for us to hire an attorney and purchase listing on an exchange. We can always sell tokens through a dev sell wall to raise more money. The product development wont be put on hold since we do not need to hire any developers. Not having marketing wont kill us, since releasing a working product will organically drive buyers to our ERC20 token, and will allow us to raise eth on the secondary market (aka exchanges).
In short, we've weighed the pro's and con's of releasing our identities before hiring legal help, and the cons far outweigh the pros. We dont need funds to BUILD our product, we need funds to PROMOTE it. Building apps is what the entire team is specialized in, so funding or not, it will eventually get done. Not to mention all of us are employed full time, so there are no starving developers living on hopes and dreams on our team :]
If people do not want to trust us, we don't blame them and we do not hold it against them. Just for perspective, people thought EOS was a scam when it was announced.
I'm iffy on the anonymous part but this makes total sense to me when you put it into perspective. Something is always better than nothing and if there is a working prototype, that should kind of speak for itself. I guess early investors who take the risk stand to take the most.
Really looking forward to see where this goes!
Re: [ANN][ICO] ONEPAY - Decentralized POS Solutions on the EOS Blockchain
Kind of a competitor to PundiX and Belugapay. I am intrigued by this concept and would like to know more about any current prototypes of the technology, is there anything you can share?
Also, is this product envisioned for e-commerce?
Also, is this product envisioned for e-commerce?
We will be creating Magento and Wordpress E-commerce plugins in the near future! More news about this will be release when we have a solid working demo :]
Interesting...will you offer an API for those who dont use a prebuilt shopping cart / cms system?
Re: [ANN][ICO] ONEPAY - Decentralized POS Solutions on the EOS Blockchain
How long before you guys have some sort of a prototype ?
We actually already have one! The video will be posted later this week (we have a photographer with a top-down camera rig coming to film the usage video). The demo app is currently only for Android but the Apple version is in the works as well. Stay tuned for the video, we will post it here and on our site when it is up!
Are you guys going to solely have iphone/android apps or will you have terminals too eventually like pundi x?
Re: [ANN][ICO] ONEPAY - Decentralized POS Solutions on the EOS Blockchain
Thank you! We are excited to revolutionize the POS industry as well as bring cryptocurrency transactions into the mainstream! The ICO opens with a pre-sale on 2/16/2018
so how many tokens will be available?
Re: [ANN][SMART AIRDROP] eGAS Token | Smart Airdrop as Service (SAaS) project
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Exactly this!
The large price increase was me buying 6ETH (about 190k) worth from $0.02 to $0.06, and telling my coworkers to buy some too. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1f9ca523464ab3084f6d8dd3768d239f661e7b4fdbf929f4fcfc57df33f42806
No offense to dev or project, but such posts will not help !
i honestly dont care if you believe me or not. i can crash the price for you guys right now if you want. i dont post on this forum because im too busy looking at cmc and telegram, i dont see what my post count has to do with my wallet. if you want proof i can send you 1 EGAS from my wallet with 194k EGAS in it and you can feel stupid. Your broke ass probably has $20 invested in EGAS, I have over $7,000 , so believe me, it matters a lot more to me that this isnt a scam than it matters for you.
I am a long-term investor.
At the moment my investment is worth more than $30,000.00.
That is a lot of money, but not interesting for me.
I only want to take a little profit at $10,- at least.
If the DEV comes with a good product, eGAS can easily go to $10,- given the market capital.
Not soon, but if the team continues, shows itself and starts to handle the project more professionally, then I believe that $10,- is possible.
Thats the thing, the market cap is so low right now that $5 price would put it at $50m market cap which is NOTHING these days, AND this is a really good idea. If the devs bailed, oh well, but they had a chance to make a huge amount of cash. I'll keep holding until then regardless, because at $5 itll be $1m profit for me, which is worth gambling $8k on.
Re: [ANN][SMART AIRDROP] eGAS Token | Smart Airdrop as Service (SAaS) project
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Exactly this!
The large price increase was me buying 6ETH (about 190k) worth from $0.02 to $0.06, and telling my coworkers to buy some too. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1f9ca523464ab3084f6d8dd3768d239f661e7b4fdbf929f4fcfc57df33f42806
No offense to dev or project, but such posts will not help !
i honestly dont care if you believe me or not. i can crash the price for you guys right now if you want. i dont post on this forum because im too busy looking at cmc and telegram, i dont see what my post count has to do with my wallet. if you want proof i can send you 1 EGAS from my wallet with 194k EGAS in it and you can feel stupid. Your broke ass probably has $20 invested in EGAS, I have over $7,000 , so believe me, it matters a lot more to me that this isnt a scam than it matters for you.
Re: [ANN][SMART AIRDROP] eGAS Token | Smart Airdrop as Service (SAaS) project
I notice hours after, and then 2 days after the 1,000,000 eGas transfer to Etherdelta, there were two extremely large transfers to two other accounts with a combined total of 760,000 eGas.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
It would take a long time to trade up to this holding without sending the price up to very high values. These two transfers we made before the recent price increases, and at a time when volumes had previously rarely gone over $3000 a day.
Anybody who accumulates a token to this extent and this slowly will transfer regularly to there wallet. This has not happened in this case. Instead we see two large transfers into two inactive wallets. This suggest the tokens come from somewhere else and from a body that holds an awful lot of tokens. Dev I suggest.
Just one question though to my observation. Why transfer tokens via Etherdelta and not directly to a wallet. Well if you know how to do it, it would cover the link that would allow us to assume the token ownership of these wallets.
This has all come at at a time when we have seen the recent phishing website positing on this forum, threatening wallet security. I notice other large wallet holders have transferred tokens to new wallets recently, which is a solid security step. Securing tokens in more than 1 wallet is also way of spreading risk and managing accounts.
Moving 1,000,000 tokens does not mean it has changed ownership. How long would it have taken to sell 1,000,000 tokens back at that time of lower volumes, and how far would that have driven the price down. The transfer of 1,000,000 eGas happened after the dip to $.002.
I very sensibly suggest that these 1 million tokens have not been traded at all and have merely been moved to other wallets is a way that is deliberately difficult to follow. No coin is perfect, but if on balance you are looking for something that has a chance of skyrocketing, like a few other coins have done, then eGas is as good and anything you will find.
Hold.
Exactly this!
The large price increase was me buying 6ETH (about 190k) worth from $0.02 to $0.06, and telling my coworkers to buy some too. https://etherscan.io/tx/0x1f9ca523464ab3084f6d8dd3768d239f661e7b4fdbf929f4fcfc57df33f42806