Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 43 results by ericwang
TIP ADDRESS: 12svhy2FuVXgFp4w3Fcrym19MLu2zoi1bTsent, thx!
sent, thx!
发送了， 谢谢！
发送了， 谢谢！
已发送， 谢谢！
已发送， 谢谢！
已发送， 谢谢！
已发送， 谢谢！
已发送， 谢谢！
发送了， 谢谢！
已4个确认， 多谢！
已4个确认， 谢谢！
I have the same problem of transferring my bitcoin to my coinbase wallet, the transfer nerver shows in blockchain and there is nothing getting in me wallet for 24 hours now. opened a ticket, sure no answer so far.
As the blockchain grows and becomes more cumbersome, what is being proposed to curtail the size and speed up the blockchain and processing speed. If it gets too big BTC will collapse on itself. Thus problem only gets worse with wider adaption....ideas?
please read the bitcoin white paper and you will have the exact answer.
and copy and paste
"I've done a bit of blockchain exploring.
The block in question where all the bitcoin days were destroyed is this one:
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000048445e1220a78e53de15c74160ffbe4dad0b52099560e045f
About 120,000 btc were moved. There are many transactions in this block in the 4,500-5,000 btc range. I followed the source addresses back in time. The ones I've looked at all trace their heritage to this monstrous transaction from 27 January 2011:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8f8210694d3631a88ff410c573d80caf57db1d8af397bd47687aa4e4c1802464
A single transaction moved 400,000 btc to a single address; this one:
https://blockchain.info/address/1AYtnRppWM7tWQaVLpm7TvcHKrjKxgCRvX
So whoever made the transaction yesterday had 400,000 btc in a single address in 2011. If it isn't Satoshi, who the hell is it?
Note that that 1AY... address had some transactions on 26 November this year; shortly before the ATH on 28 November. A huge whale, perhaps the biggest single holder of btc in existence, is stirring. The question is, why?
EDIT: 400,000 btc in early 2011 was almost 10% of all btc in existence. In a single address. Wow."
"I've done a bit of blockchain exploring.
The block in question where all the bitcoin days were destroyed is this one:
https://blockchain.info/block/00000000000000048445e1220a78e53de15c74160ffbe4dad0b52099560e045f
About 120,000 btc were moved. There are many transactions in this block in the 4,500-5,000 btc range. I followed the source addresses back in time. The ones I've looked at all trace their heritage to this monstrous transaction from 27 January 2011:
https://blockchain.info/tx/8f8210694d3631a88ff410c573d80caf57db1d8af397bd47687aa4e4c1802464
A single transaction moved 400,000 btc to a single address; this one:
https://blockchain.info/address/1AYtnRppWM7tWQaVLpm7TvcHKrjKxgCRvX
So whoever made the transaction yesterday had 400,000 btc in a single address in 2011. If it isn't Satoshi, who the hell is it?
Note that that 1AY... address had some transactions on 26 November this year; shortly before the ATH on 28 November. A huge whale, perhaps the biggest single holder of btc in existence, is stirring. The question is, why?
EDIT: 400,000 btc in early 2011 was almost 10% of all btc in existence. In a single address. Wow."
No!! this guy did not sell those coins, he was distributing his btc in 4,000-10,000， this kind of small account, and those 120,000 btc still belongs to this guy, terrible!
Solo mining could be referred to winning the lottery due to the high difficulty, but you can still mine Bitcoins in pools.
winning a lottery does not always mean win a huge one. The mechanism of mass competing is essential both of them, bitcoin and lottery, so as the reward should be similar. The reason I compare them here is that I believe in case of bitcoin, the reward, bitcoin, should be at the others' costs too, that could be very big.