Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 45 results by etile
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
etile
on 21/01/2017, 11:52:56 UTC
Click on "contact support" button.
Then you will have an option to open a ticket, do it and you will probably get a positive response within 24 hours, atleast at my case.

There is no "contact support" button.

There are "FAQ", "Feedback", "Forum", "Message", "Twitter", "Facebook"
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: BetMoose.com - Betting Exchange | Prediction Market | Real World Events | P2P
by
etile
on 17/01/2017, 21:03:22 UTC
Incorrect source usage, incorrect outcome, incorrect early resolution and incorrect Refunds:

https://www.betmoose.com/bet/new-bitcoin-all-time-high-before-september-2017-2113


Hi again etile, as we discussed with you before, this was resolved incorrectly by the host. Our fault was closing it early due to the author's confusing decision logic, though as you can see by our admin comment, we will reimburse those No bettors as good will.

We do not believe you had any wagers placed in this proposition, if you have any issues please email us!

-Adam

Hi BetMoose!

1. The host with nickname "sirlanka" tell that he agree with "etile". That's me.
2. So this bet was closed and resolved by mods. Not by the host.
3. I marked the bet as "incorrect outcome" before resolving. Mods ignore this.
4. If mod do not understand "decision logic" why mod do not ask the host?
5. I have some anonymous Yes bets that was refunded incorrectly.
6. Mod with nickname "Avalon" was against the host opinion.
7. So the mod has some anonymous Yes bets here and mods didnt want to share profit with late leeches. But late leeches should exists here due to decision login. Mods ignores the host opinion and make profit for mods.

Good luck! Make more anonymous profits for mods!

Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
etile
on 17/01/2017, 20:44:03 UTC
Why this bet not has been resolved?

https://fairlay.com/market/bitcoin-to-top-1100-usd-before-march-1/


How to report early resolution?

I think that you should send them an email through the onsite ticket system.

Link them this and they will solve it pretty fast.

Don't worry, one of the best things in fairlay is their support.

Where is the onsite ticket system?

Resolve please
https://fairlay.com/market/bitcoin-to-top-900-usd-before-april-1/
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: BetMoose.com - Betting Exchange | Prediction Market | Real World Events | P2P
by
etile
on 08/01/2017, 12:26:41 UTC
Incorrect source usage, incorrect outcome, incorrect early resolution and incorrect Refunds:

https://www.betmoose.com/bet/new-bitcoin-all-time-high-before-september-2017-2113
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
etile
on 08/01/2017, 12:20:33 UTC
Why this bet not has been resolved?

https://fairlay.com/market/bitcoin-to-top-1100-usd-before-march-1/


How to report early resolution?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
etile
on 13/06/2016, 19:26:55 UTC

Ok, it is closed now.

But when it will be resolved to Yes side?
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: FAIRLAY - SPORTS BETTING for experts - highest liquidity, provably best odds
by
etile
on 13/06/2016, 08:13:53 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Gambling
Re: BetMoose.com - Betting Exchange | Prediction Market | Real World Events | P2P
by
etile
on 12/06/2016, 21:57:31 UTC
incorrect payouts

https://www.betmoose.com/bet/bitcoin-to-top-600-before-aug-2016-1878

The bet says any bets within a week of $600 for YES will be refunded. So 600 happened 11th June, therefore all bets for YES from 5th - 11th June should be refunded if you follow the terms of this bet.

fix please
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 25/04/2016, 19:36:28 UTC
BTW you can bet about 600$/btc  before August 1st 2016 here

https://www.betmoose.com/bet/bitcoin-to-top-600-before-aug-2016-1878


I think the ratio will stabilize about 1:1 level
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 22/04/2016, 17:26:20 UTC
That is impossible that it can happen,

Ok,
take my money, make the bet
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 22/04/2016, 12:01:02 UTC
Ok,

I created new bet on betmoose.com

https://www.betmoose.com/bet/bitcoin-to-top-900-before-sep-2016-1879


Feel free to bet with me on that site.


Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 18/04/2016, 11:27:07 UTC
Ok, boys and girls, lets play with the small bets.


Bet 1.

The bet with 1.1 : 1 ratio.
The price of one Bitcoin in USD will rise over $600 before September 2016 as per Bitstamp .

So I want to bet 0.110 BTC on Yes side.
You should bet 0.100 BTC on No side.

So we transfer 0.150 + 0.140 btc = 0.290 btc on 2x2 multisig address.

After Sep 01 2016 or after the event we transfer 0.250 btc to the winner side and 0.040 btc to the lost side.


Bet 2.

The bet with 1 : 1.1 ratio.
The price of one Bitcoin in USD will rise over $600 before September 2016 as per Bitstamp .

So I want to bet 0.100 BTC on No side.
You should bet 0.110 BTC on Yes side.

So we transfer 0.140 + 0.150 btc = 0.290 btc on 2x2 multisig address.

After Sep 01 2016 or after the event we transfer 0.250 btc to the winner side and 0.040 btc to the lost side.


Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 11/04/2016, 18:37:28 UTC
1.1:1 ratio for 600$/btc before Sep 01 2016

1:3.8 ratio for 900$/btc before Sep 01 2016
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 07/04/2016, 06:14:00 UTC
Added 1:1 ratio for 600$/btc before Sep 01 2016

1:4 ratio for 900$/btc before Sep 01 2016
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 07/04/2016, 05:57:28 UTC
And who will be third party? You? Your friend? Mircea Popescu?
Mircea is a good choice.  Cheesy

I do not trust Mircea anymore.

BitBet uses zero fee transactions for delaying winner payments

And makes refunds in some cases it should not be.

Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 05/04/2016, 16:14:26 UTC
You are just complicating things now. By using a 2 out of 2 address in gambling you are asking for trouble, some people are bad losers. Just use a 2 out of 3 address and you will be fine.

And who will be third party? You? Your friend? Mircea Popescu?

How often do you lock your money with 2of2 multisig address? Any stats?
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 05/04/2016, 13:27:32 UTC
The losing party want to receive 0.1 btc for the lost side.

We can rise it to 0.2 btc or to 0.5 btc if you want
So: I lose. You win. I get 0.1 BTC, you get 5.9 BTC. If I do not sign, we both get nothing. I'll make you an offer you can not refuse: pay me 2 bitcoin for my signature code!
You can see the flaw in your system.

You never receive more than 0.1 btc.

You release this money in 2026 if you found me :-)
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 05/04/2016, 13:22:49 UTC
The losing party want to receive 0.1 btc for the lost side.
You don't understand how 2 of 2 multisig works obviously nor did you understand my post. It is not well suited for gambling. Once someone loses, they can refuse to release their money.

Yes, and they never receive 0.1 btc bonus.

We can make 10 btc bonus and make bet for 1:1 btc for 600$ usd/btc before Sep 2016

So you send 11 btc to 2of2 address, and I send 11 btc to 2of2 address.

One side win 1 btc, other side lost 1 btc.

So lost side want to receive 10 btc back and release money.
Post
Topic
Board Speculation
Re: Bet: Bitcoin to top $900 before Sep 2016
by
etile
on 05/04/2016, 13:11:20 UTC
Two out of two isn't the right way to go. What happens when the losing party refuses to let go of their funds? You will end up in a long (possibly 'permanent') stalemate. Just use what was suggested in the link that you've provided:

The losing party want to receive 0.1 btc for the lost side.

We can rise it to 0.2 btc or to 0.5 btc if you want