If there is 1% of cases where you will ask for a KYC, then you are not a no-KYC.
First, you say that you will refund coins with too high an AML score that you cannot trade. What is correct here?

Just because they have a liquidity partner, they cannot be guaranteed to be no-KYC. It does not depend on them, but on the partner through whom the exchange process is carried out. They need to remove "no-KYC" from the subject line.

No news source could be a significant criterion for determining the value of a coin. Every news portal has the option of purchasing news publication, and the price difference varies only with the popularity of the portal. So, for a certain amount, you can easily pump a coin or product.
As for the OP's tool, it seems to rely too heavily on Google News as a source, which is certainly not neutral enough.

Yeah. The fact that we currently have dozens of developed forums with a large user base is obvious proof. Today, it is very easy to develop and maintain a forum with 99.9% uptime online, boasting 3.7 million registered accounts.
this was sarcastic

It's not worth back. Better start your own forum, which will be spam-free. At least that's not a big job.

The flag is usually raised when all options have been exhausted and all evidence has been checked. OK, I guess you learned your lesson.
Also, update the subject of this thread, add [SOLVED] or similar, also update the first post, and add this last your post there.
Reputation is hard to gain, and very easy to damage. The worst thing is when something like this happens because of wrong information.

I would not say that the casino's own token will bring extreme profits through its value alone. It is more like a method of rewarding loyal users, and such things exist outside the crypto ecosystem.
It brings more profit as a feature, and it's a real wonder that not all casinos have implemented it. Obviously, whoever manages Whale.io, understands the business in its entirety.

Those of us who have been actively following Bitcoin and all significant movements in the crypto system for a long time, do anyone at all consider -2% on a daily basis as a critical signal?
OK, maybe the most active traders see it as an opportunity or vice versa, but 2%, regardless of whether it is up or down, does not seem like a significant movement.

Najbolji tender je onaj koji ti raspises. Mudre reci jednog mog prijatelja.
Koji je naziv kada neoliberalni kapitalizam preuzme mafijaski sistem? Na primer, kad se prijavis na tender, a onda ti neko sa trecom ponudom dodje kuci i preti da se povuces, jer narusavas neke vec napravljene dogovore. Ili kad se tender javno objavi tek nakon donosenja odluke o "najpovoljnijoj" ponudi...

Drzava je bila ta koja je diktirala crno trziste deviza. Ima cak i dovoljno svedocenja o tome. Naravno, uvek neko 'obican' prepozna priliku pa pokusa da uzme deo kolaca, ali bez drzave iza sebe, to je samo statisticka greska.
Verovatno vec zvi znaju za semu rudarenja kriptovaluta na Kosovu, gde zbog "mira u kuci", obican narod nije placao struju, pa je to korisceno za mining biznis. Takvo nesto ne radi neko ko nema podrsku drzave. Pod drzava, ne mislim da je vlada donela odluku, pa se postupalo po njoj, vec pojedinci (ili grupe) na polozajima, koji su to radili pod okriljem institucija koje predstavljaju.

Pre par dana, jedan advokat je najavio otkrivanje afere u Pancevu, sa sve svedokom saradnikom, gde su drzavni sluzbenici ostetili budzet (10 mil eur se spominje) i novac konvertovali u kriptovalute. to ti je jedan primer kada se Bitcoin kupuje za kesh i ne trazi se provizija. Jednostavno, na 10 mil. dobiti iz nicega, koga briga za jos +/-1% provizije.

I'm not sure if it's the most massive campaign ever, but there were also some massive campaigns in the past. As I remember, for example, Yobit, but there was no public spreadsheet, because the counting was automated. I think there was a thread with cheaters and spammers from that campaign, and there were more than 100 of them alone.

You make a claim here that can equally be considered biased, like what you accuse others of.
I don't think we should look at whether a service deserves a flag or not, based on the signature of the campaign. Already based on the presented facts and evidence. It is always useful if a proven, reputable member can confirm the accuracy of the evidence.
I don't think that managers should have a consensus on whether to support or use a flag.

No one guarantees that Coingecko will not also promote shitcoins. I know that they were even more flexible for listing trash coins and trash exchanges. That put me off using CG as the basic info source.

Of course, the conclusion is that no matter how big CMC or a similar service is, we shouldn't necessarily trust them, because in the end, they all work for money.

When I need to withdraw cash or pay something through the service, I usually convert BTC to a stable coin, thus reducing the chances of freezing funds or incurring a worse exchange rate. I keep the stable coin with me only as long as the transactions last.

I'm more surprised that LTC is above ETH, pretty good demand for this coin.

As a Free Market Capitalist says, neutral tag, it's not something you need to worry too much about.
It is certainly strange that you, as someone who is not excessively active on the forum, care about signature campaigns and the way some managers lead them. Also, it is quite logical for someone like JollyGood to set off an alarm that it is a posting from an alternative account. We have seen it many times.

CCECash ponovo nagradjuje sa $30 bes posebnih uslova. Tek je pokrenuto, pa ima slobondog mesta, ali ovo se uvek brzo popuni, pa navalite.
Srecno.

Slot #: 28 & 34
BTC Address: bc1qnhnz6lvg03uzyrrcljur4s95u5dalfkdwsnqru

Everything is fine with the domain. I always use whale.io, I'm used to it, and the domain is short, so I can type it in faster. 
Although, as far as I've seen, Whale has a large number of alternative domains, it seems that they all use the same database, so the same account is used everywhere, regardless of which domain you log in to.

It might not be a bad idea to list all original domains under whale.io control in the footer of the site to prevent potential phishing scams. Given that whale.io is a rapidly growing casino, it's probably only a matter of time before it becomes a primary target for impersonators.

Mozda bi i trebao otvoriti temu na forumu i izneti svoje iskustvo. Bas lose je to sa skrivenim uslovima, ako ne mogu isplatiti bednih 10tak dolara za nekakvu promociju, bolje da je ni ne organizuju. Ionako kazina ima i previse, taman malo da se izfiltriraju.
Ovo sa strategijom je bas jadan izgovor, narocito ako se prica o iznosu od 50$.
Takodje, to sa Chips.gg, je vredno negativnog taga, jer varaju korisnike i ne isplacuju obecano.

$109999

Sta konkretno se desilo? Prenosenje direktnog iskustva je uvek korisno, a svakako je bolje od 'rekla-kazala' metoda.
Ja svakako izbegavam sve te nagradne tombole ili kako god se vec zovu, gde moras ispunjavati neke posebne uslove. Jednostavno mi se ne da cimati previse za potencijalnih 10tak dolara, plus jos moram imati srece da ja budem random srecnik, sto se prilicno retko desava.

29 - examplens

Boga pitaj kako menadzeri uopste broje lokalne postove, ne verujem da svaki post provlace kroz g.translate da bi utvrdili je li spam ili ne. Sad, tebi Pmalek verovatno nije mnogo ni zagledao svaki post, jer zna na osnovu neke istorije da tvoji postovi nisu spam.

Mozda bolje da napravis kompilaciju svih alata u jednom threadu, verujem da bi to bilo korisnije.
Imas ovako nesto: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5554423.0
Sad da li da samo prevedes ili eventualno napravis svoju listu po ovom modelu, gde ces samostalno dodavati ili uklanjati alate, zavisno od toga da li su aktivni i dostupni jos uvek. Ja bih radije video svezu verziju na lokalu, nego samo prevedenu outdated.