Search content
Sort by
Showing 20 of 13,570 results by examplens
Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
OH LOL... AMAZING .. REALLY
You even have to exclude me from the DT, and who do we keep you and vod?
definitely a good buy for the community
I have proven over the years to be a reliable person who works hard for the forum and the community, I think your comment makes it clear that there is hatred towards me
I don't know why such a reaction. I just stated how I see the whole thing.You even have to exclude me from the DT, and who do we keep you and vod?
definitely a good buy for the community
I have proven over the years to be a reliable person who works hard for the forum and the community, I think your comment makes it clear that there is hatred towards me
I don't know how you realized that something was against you and how you understood that "As for the negative tag by Vod, it's probably excessive" was hatred toward you.
As you can see, I neither put you on the ~ list nor left any tag.
Quote
are you sure you never made a mistake? or vod?
I will search the past to find where you went wrong and bring it to light
I don't have any problems, I know the skeletons in everyone's closet
Now you are creating a personal conflict and acting vengefully, which makes you biased in the further discussion.I will search the past to find where you went wrong and bring it to light
I don't have any problems, I know the skeletons in everyone's closet
I have neither the time nor the interest in internet warfare.
I agree with your dession. You thik that maybe I've a alt or I'm doing merit farming. Actually I don't know the rules I know that if I add a source there is no problem. That's my fault. Form next time I will not do this type of work. Thanks for the warning type por remainder. In future that type of mistake will never done by me. After few some time sir I will request for reconsideration it's a humble request to you.
It's not just about adding a source it's about adding random tweets is not what we want to see in regular discussions. If you already want to participate in a discussion, make sure that it is your words and your opinion.Changing your behavior here should not be just for removing the tag, but adapting to the rules of behavior on this forum.
Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
Hi guys, honestly I don't even remember since it's a feedback from January
I never give feedback on my own but I follow someone to reinforce
maybe whoever originally put it removed it and now I don't even remember why, since the reference is missing
What do you recommend doing?
That's exactly why references are used: to help people easily remember the reason for a certain red flag. If you can't remember why you left feedback, how complicated is it for others to understand it?I never give feedback on my own but I follow someone to reinforce
maybe whoever originally put it removed it and now I don't even remember why, since the reference is missing
What do you recommend doing?
There may be a valid reason for the red feedback, but the one you left is incorrect.
As for the negative tag by Vod, it's probably excessive, because it's just your ignorance or misunderstanding of the DT system. If punishment is already necessary in such a case, it would be more appropriate to exclude you from the DT selection.
I must admit I tested your forum a bit with my last posts, and you still handled it perfectly.
I'm a little curious. What tests exactly did you run, and can you share the reports from those tests in more detail? It will probably be useful to the admins, so they will be able to improve this forum even more.
Takodjer, da li mozda netko ima info koje mjenjacnice rade problem sa lovom koja je dosla sa eXch? Mislim da sam vidio nekakav post na njihovoj temi gdje je bila lista tih mjenjacnica ali nisam ziher da li je istina ili sam nesto pomijesao.
Secam se da je na toj listi bio i Binance. Prvo sam se iznenadio otkud oni, a bilo bi malo lose po njihovu reputaciju da se pojavi i Binance kao ucesnik u Bybit nagradnoj kampanji, gde se love coins koje je BB izgubio svojom neozbiljnoscu.
Ipak, treba proveriti i datume. Kada je objavljena lista menjacnica koje nemaju problem sa eXch, jer velika je razlika pre i posle BB hack.
Upravo sam prelistao history da nadem reddit teme o kojima je rijec. Krivo sam rekao da je rijec o mjenjacnici, jer je covjek napisao samo "service", bez ulazenja o kojoj je tocno usluzi rijec a ja sam pretpostavio da je rijec o mjenjacnici. Zapravo je glavna tema bila da je Etherscan ili Bybit u svoj "community notes" oznacio adresu koja je dobila ETH sa Exch-a.
Taj community note je uklonjen. Inace je bio referenca na Twitter post nekog od tih cuvenih lovaca na Lazarus.Re: DT1 and DT2 members who have negative feedback (or are banned)
Their negative trust reads:
So babo's feedback went from "i dont know," in 2019 to "in 2025 i think not" 5.5 years later. That doesn't make sense, even if the interpretation would have changed in 2025, the event happened in 2019.| babo | 2025-01-03 | leaking confidential information, for good of all - is ethical? in 2025 i think not |
Such feedback without an unambiguous reference link is pretty much useless. At least I rarely consider them as relevant.
E.g. 1api.net responded with a ticket no. but hasn't came back to me since too many days. I speak German, but I don't have a burner phone to call them and maintain my anonymity properly. Need to figure out how to do it with proper opsec. I don't really want to link my account here easily with my real identity or get doxxed.
Isn't there a possibility to make a call from a public phone or similar? How much does a temporary "burner phone" cost, I am willing to donate the cost.I am very interested in what 1api.net has to say about all the reports so far and why they do not respond to them.
One of my email got blocked by google/gmail because it contained a phishing link while reporting a phishing domain! I mean WTF! 
sent another set of reports!
Do not use direct links, but always with [.] sent another set of reports!
Emails with links will be ignored even by some of the strictest spam protections
Za ovakve nepoznate mjenjacnice najbolje ti je provjeriti preko web stranica kao sto je Scam detector. Ova stranica ima nisku ocjenu 8.4/100 tako da ti je po mojem misljenju bolje izbjegavati. A ako ces je koristiti radije nemoj stavljati vece svote novaca.
https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/cce-cash-review/
U svakom slucaju puno bolje se drzati preporucenih mjenjacnica sa OrangeFren ili one druge sto je Dkbit98 gore naveo
Iskreno, ne bih se bas oslanjao na ove automatizovane provere. Oni pretrazuju neke osnovne informacije, koje ne moraju biti relevantne. Vise se bave autoritetom domena, sto ozbiljan scamer moze lako da izmanipulise.https://www.scam-detector.com/validator/cce-cash-review/
U svakom slucaju puno bolje se drzati preporucenih mjenjacnica sa OrangeFren ili one druge sto je Dkbit98 gore naveo
Sto se tice pozudanih menjacnica, svakako je dobar pravac prvo proveriti na ovom forumu, pa tek onda ici dalje. Mada i ovde se mogu pronaci pozitivni reviews, a u stvari je to bila samo placena kampanja.
Re: 💎 The Change Ltd automatic Cryptocurrency Exchange | Official company
That kinda proves my point: a normal "officially registered company" would put their office address on their website. A name in a PDF in a random country doesn't inspire confidence and makes me think this is at best a postbox company.
Offshore companies have always only served to represent the legality of a business, and that's a great way to increase credibility. Earlier, I did a little analysis of that "PDF register", mostly shell companies, so I understand that there is no insistence on publishing information on the site, because it is not representative.We understand that having a website listed in a directory even after ceasing collaboration with them may pose certain risks. This is precisely why we use such text in the snippet, so that search engines explicitly state that we no longer work with them. This page remains accessible so that users can read reviews from others or share their own experiences of working with them.
So Bestchange, since you decided to keep exch old domain on your directory even when it turned out to be a phishing site later stating that you wanted to past reviews to remain accessible to other users even though it was delisted/disabled, why then do you wipe out information by other services?Should all other scam exchanges be treated the same. At least exch did not scam, but the likes of N exchange are giving users a very bad experience and all you just do is wipe off the information? Please help me understand. Why are you doing this selectively?
1. Yoa Exchanger - Possibly link to n exchange.
It was initially listed on your platform according to archives - (https://web.archive.org/web/20240418124842/https://www.bestchange.com/yoa-exchanger.html)
But as of today, all the information is wiped off your platform - https://www.bestchange.com/yoa-exchanger.html
2. N exchange
Again, initially listed on your platform - (https://web.archive.org/web/20240719034109/https://www.bestchange.ru/nexchange-exchanger.html) and (https://web.archive.org/web/20241212033316/https://www.bestchange.com/nexchange-exchanger.html)
But today, not a single trace - https://www.bestchange.ru/nexchange-exchanger.html and https://www.bestchange.com/nexchange-exchanger.html
They lowered the criteria quite low.
Re: 💎 The Change Ltd automatic Cryptocurrency Exchange | Official company
we’re an officially registered company
So you keep saying.... But I can't find any information about your company on your Contacts page.They should be able to be found in this registry.
https://www.cr.gov.hk/docs/wrpt/wk_new&changednamecoys_20241230.pdf
ID (77537541)
SCAM: Funds held for 6 months — no response, no refund
I made an exchange from TRX to ZEC via (powered by Changelly). All AML/KYC requirements were fulfilled: identity verification, income statements, official contracts with stamps — everything was submitted properly.
To begin with, I suggest you open a separate scam accusation topic and present all the details about your case.I made an exchange from TRX to ZEC via (powered by Changelly). All AML/KYC requirements were fulfilled: identity verification, income statements, official contracts with stamps — everything was submitted properly.
Here is what the scam report format should look like:
Code:
[b][color=black]What happened:: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Scammers Profile Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Reference Link: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Amount Scammed: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Payment Method: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Proof of Payment: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]PM/Chat Logs: [/color][/b]
[b][color=black]Additional Notes: [/color][/b]
Your presentation suggests that your case concerns Changelly, and the scam accusation should be directed at them. The fact that you reached them through the BestChange site is irrelevant; for example, you could have found them through Google, but you certainly wouldn't accuse them of organized fraud.
To be clear, this is certainly not a defense of BC, for some time now, their standards for cooperation with exchanges have been questionable, to say the least.
Re: Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian)
Lepo sam se ismejao dok sam citao 
Hvala jos jednom na podrsci!
Sto se tice prevoda da,definitiivno ce se usporiti. Svi stariji kao sto je Trofo rekao vec znaju i korist je minimalna jer je vec procitano,dobra stvar je u tome sto se stvarno nesto nauci i moze koristiti novim clanovima. To sto se merita tice,moze da se ugrabi koji,ali od autora tih topica tesko,jer imam vec 2 teme prevedene a da fillippone verovatno nije ni pogledao,ali dobro teme su svakako jako zanimljive
Kad se vec odlucujes za prevod, gledaj da to ne radis iz razloga jer je originalni kreator obecao neke merite za to. Svakako pogledaj kada je neka tema kreirana, pa ako je bas old, velika je verovatnoca da su je svi odavde vec videli. Samim tim nije bas najkorisnije ulozen trud. Hvala jos jednom na podrsci! Sto se tice prevoda da,definitiivno ce se usporiti. Svi stariji kao sto je Trofo rekao vec znaju i korist je minimalna jer je vec procitano,dobra stvar je u tome sto se stvarno nesto nauci i moze koristiti novim clanovima. To sto se merita tice,moze da se ugrabi koji,ali od autora tih topica tesko,jer imam vec 2 teme prevedene a da fillippone verovatno nije ni pogledao,ali dobro teme su svakako jako zanimljive
Plus si ovde gotovo kao mezimac i prilicno ti dobro ide
, ulozi trud u nesto korisnije.Svakako ti ide u prilog i ovo preuzimanje trona od slackovica.
@Everyone
monero[.]forex isn't down. It's online again. According to WHOIS records, they changed their registrar status on 29 April. That's why they were offline a few days. WHOIS no longer mentions a connection to Identity.Digital, which was there in the past.
Can those who know more about WHOIS confirm that http://www.1api.net is now the sole party that needs to receive complaints for monero.forex?
It seems that it was only a change of hosting or something similar, since there are no recognized changes regarding the domain setup.monero[.]forex isn't down. It's online again. According to WHOIS records, they changed their registrar status on 29 April. That's why they were offline a few days. WHOIS no longer mentions a connection to Identity.Digital, which was there in the past.
Can those who know more about WHOIS confirm that http://www.1api.net is now the sole party that needs to receive complaints for monero.forex?
You can check here: https://whoisfreaks.com/tools/whois/history/lookup/monero.forex
Also, if anyone here speaks German, maybe it can contact this shady registrar by phone
Code:
Registrar
Name: 1API GmbH
Url: http://www.1api.net
Email: abuse@1api.net
Number: +4968949396850
I got a confirmation from sites@mcafee.com of monero.forex phishing complaint being resolved.
Good that the scammer's website is being banned.
Looking forward to seeing the remaining get banned as well.
This is the Power of Unity at play. Since these scammers want to make life miserable for innocent people, they too would never succeed in their evil act. All their websites must be brought down with alacrity.
It seems you misinterpreted the information. The scammer's phishing complaint has been imported, and the warning label on this domain has now been removed. It is available without any warnings.Good that the scammer's website is being banned.
Looking forward to seeing the remaining get banned as well.
This is the Power of Unity at play. Since these scammers want to make life miserable for innocent people, they too would never succeed in their evil act. All their websites must be brought down with alacrity.
Re: eXch - instant exchange BTC / LN / XMR / LTC / ETH / ERC20
End of an era.
eXch should probably publish an official announcement and lock this thread; in the end, they can do without an announcement.
There is no need for further discussion here.
eXch should probably publish an official announcement and lock this thread; in the end, they can do without an announcement.
There is no need for further discussion here.
Re: Mjesečna Analiza za Hrvatsku Lokalnu Zajednicu (Bitcointalk Croatian)
slakovic = katanic... Izgleda smo dobili novog spamovica ovde
šala naravno. drago mi je da se i ovde pojavi neko nov i aktivan, što samo Nigeri i Rusi da dominiraju.
@katanic97, jesi ti to upao u Betfurry kampanju?
šala naravno. drago mi je da se i ovde pojavi neko nov i aktivan, što samo Nigeri i Rusi da dominiraju.
@katanic97, jesi ti to upao u Betfurry kampanju?
Re: Bybit now forcing users to carry out Facial recognition when withdrawing.
Time to move from bybit and never use those fuckers again!
Yeah, I think it's indeed a good idea to move from bybit. Aside from the reasons mentioned, it appears the facial recognition for withdrawals is still not mandatory for everyone, thus is an additional for certain cases: https://www.bybit.com/en/help-center/article/How-to-Submit-Additional-Verification-for-Withdrawal
A historical hack that was created through their negligence, and they persistently accuse others of it. Now they are making withdrawing as difficult as possible, almost blackmailing their attitude towards users and their access to funds.
I'm not being sarcastic, but what does Bybit currently offer better than the competition?
What happens to nuked phishing domains in the long run? Will they become available again once their registration expires in the future, or will they stay locked forever?
The scammer has transferred the domain to another registrar several times. Each transfer requires a new renewal. So this domain is under the control of the registrar (easyDNS) at least until 2028-05-01. I don't think the scammer will wait 3 years to try his method again with this same domain.I was impressed as well, it was very quick from their side.
Of the 8 domains on the list, two were with easyDNS, and we can say that both were suspended shortly after the report. All praise for the responsibility of this service.