Well thanks for posting the link. I believe that the earth is an oblate spheroid, so I don't think I would have been welcome there.

Since you seem to enjoy twisting what the Bible says, you aren't any different than the anti-God atheists.

You skip right on by the place where God made the sky... verse 6. God placed the materials for making the sun and stars, yes, and even the moon, into the sky that He made when He separated the muddy waters.

Because God was working with the waters on Earth, He simply calls them the waters under the sky. He never says that he left the waters above the sky together in one sea, or that the waters above the sky were not in other parts of the sky. After all, if you were on one of those spheres of water, it would seem that all the other spheres of water were above the sky, as well.

The Bible isn't there for its description of the shape of the earth. But you can tell that the earth is something like a sphere if you read all the parts together. Then, modern (and some not so modern) technology proves that the Bible is right.

Besides, if you were so Bible inclined, and such a righteous person, you would at least give me the benefit of the doubt, for saying things that are easily right, even if they are not. You treat me like I am a sleazebag, something a Bible person wouldn't do. So, you prove that you are misusing the Bible when you do this, because you are being unrighteous.

With regard to this link, https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=5222193.msg53798756#msg53798756, The heavens are God's throne. You sit on a throne, like God sits on the heavens... outside of the universe, sitting on the shell of the universe. But the earth is His footstool, because He has made Himself to exist within the universe, and to walk upon the earth with men... in the form of Jesus.

You are missing it quite badly.

What's the matter? I busted your false religion, so what else can I expect, right?

At least notbatman comes up with some sensible goofy pictures. You FE jokers must be scraping the bottom of the barrel to find proof of a FE.

Aside from all the experimental, direct evidence of a round Earth (and by the way, no, Earth's shape is NOT a geoid, that is too a simplification), there's a plethora of indirect evidence coming from geology. Essentially, if Earth was flat geology as a science would be entirely incorrect and so would be all its predictions. They're not, however, which proves the obviety of Earth's roundness.

Details are a bit technical but I'd be glad to explain if anyone's curious.

We should start a charity fund to send notbatman to the Moon once SpaceX opens up the first seats for public travel.

Completely wrong understanding of God.

...some gibberish removed...

Isaiah 66:1: '1This is what the Lord says:
“Heaven is my throne,
and the earth is my footstool.
Where is the house you will build for me?
Where will my resting place be?
2Has not my hand made all these things,
and so they came into being?”
declares the Lord.

“These are the ones I look on with favor:
those who are humble and contrite in spirit,
and who tremble at my word.”'

I miss xempy.  Hey batty, fire up your sock puppet, bro.
I need a bonus FE claptrap video /silly sky fairy meme belly laugh.

I haven't always agreed with things that he said, and he's not currently a research scientist, more one whose job is explaining science to the public.

But he can run light years around your trash dribble.

By the way, lay off the stupid "bonus" please.

Sorry Batty, I might have been a bit rude.

But you can't be seriously advocating in favor of Flat Earth!
Time to end this joke, don't you think?

#


Nah, I wouldn't call it a religion, it's pure brain washed - tending to infinity dumbness.
If someone actually ended up as Batty is suggesting, watching these videos a for few fucking weeks, and not die in the process, hell yeah - the Earth is flat.
Darwin Awards material.

@notbatman, @exemplaar, et.al,

What do you think of this?


I imagine you will say it is a fabrication because not only is the distance around the edge more like 32,000 nm, but there is no way that a small sailboat could go 32,000 nm distance in only 196 days.

.....
Yeah, riiiight... dream on. Moonlanding was staged in a hollywood studio at remote secret location. No one can land on the moon as it is not a solid object but lesser light created on day 4 of Lord's creation.
....
Meaningless images deleted.

Got any proof for your wild claim?

^. David Lynch?
Or Lynch observatory? Source? Can't find anything on that.

To answer your question, emmm - yes!
You can also see planets/stars which are way further - with a naked eye no? Not to mention satellites in orbit.

Speaking of which, yo batty, check this out:



Surprise!!!

Today is the 50th anniversary since men first walked on the Moon. It is a stunning achievement that took thousands of workers, billions of dollars, and the will of an entire nation, perhaps even the world when you consider the motivations. This is a day worth celebrating.

There was a Mysterious Green Glow seen around Chicago 4 years ago.. The earth must be flat.

 

What a weird coincidence that the mountains of scientific evidence that prove the earth is round is all a fake conspiracy and a YouTube video that says otherwise proves it is flat... The odds must be, well, nonexistent...

1. "appears" doesn't mean "is".  Scale and distance are also factors.
2. You dismiss the legitimacy of any picture of the earth from an altitude at which you might see any curvature, so you really don't know if it is actually "regardless of altitude".


Don't be stupid. Those images are different in scale or focal length. Flat earth or not, the size of the moon hardly changes as it moves around the earth. Flat earth theory attributes the constant size to atmospheric refraction.