Search content
Sort by

Showing 20 of 95 results by eztezt
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Will BitStamp come back?
by
eztezt
on 09/01/2015, 13:41:53 UTC
The connection was interrupted

The connection to www.bitstamp.net was interrupted while the page was loading.

    The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
    If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: Bitstamp will easily recover from this hack
by
eztezt
on 09/01/2015, 13:40:58 UTC
The connection was interrupted

The connection to www.bitstamp.net was interrupted while the page was loading.

    The site could be temporarily unavailable or too busy. Try again in a few moments.
    If you are unable to load any pages, check your computer's network connection.
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: MTGOX 200K to 50 BTC sum in 2k Address
by
eztezt
on 11/06/2014, 12:38:01 UTC
This doesn't make sense to me. There is no rush to sell the 200k coins now, I expect that to happen in 2015.
i don't say it is selling
i said just moving
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: MTGOX 200K to 50 BTC sum in 2k Address
by
eztezt
on 11/06/2014, 11:19:58 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: MTGOX 200K to 50 BTC sum in 2k Address
by
eztezt
on 11/06/2014, 07:47:41 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Topic OP
MTGOX Coins has just started to move
by
eztezt
on 11/06/2014, 07:43:55 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Topic OP
mtgox new update 16042014
by
eztezt
on 16/04/2014, 10:07:50 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Topic OP
i can't reach bitcoinbuilder
by
eztezt
on 11/04/2014, 09:41:13 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Topic OP
what is that sombody sells in bitstamp 0.5 and btc-e 0.01
by
eztezt
on 10/04/2014, 11:55:34 UTC
what is that sombody sells in bitstamp 0.5 BTC every 12 seccond
in btc-e 0.01
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: I found New gox Addresses
by
eztezt
on 27/03/2014, 15:26:47 UTC
https://blockchain.info/tr/tx/3bda4918180fd55775a24580652f4c26d898d5840c7e71313491a05ef0b743d8

this tx 150k and 250k and 150k still accesable and 250k goes to 432K
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: I found New gox Addresses
by
eztezt
on 27/03/2014, 15:04:53 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Türkçe (Turkish)
Re: Kayıp Olan 670.000 BTC Daha Bulundu (MT Gox)
by
eztezt
on 26/03/2014, 09:17:33 UTC
haber doğruysa yükselir
çünkü bitcoine güven gelir
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: 436K Lost Mtgox BTC Splited At 2011-12-06
by
eztezt
on 24/03/2014, 13:24:25 UTC
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a is most likely a mtgox wallet
here is why:

start from here:

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q .. this is a known mtgox wallet

436K moved to https://blockchain.info/en/address/1Cj5kAeGK5CQSubY1Bk6HbGdweq15eJtH9  ..still a mtgox wallet, in fact 279.15294827 BTC is a withdrawal from one of the user in the leaked db

76b04b58-c333-44cd-a322-459fc0956800,647e689d-c56b-407a-a405-58a45b315af9,"2011-12-06 21:44:27",withdraw,-279.15294827

now let's follow 435,960.99837219 BTC

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1KNY4rzu5qDaLeqwBx4Rq9BWiDkNciUzkX ..still mtgox and you see another withdrawal (350BTC)

bb53da20-bc36-4776-894e-2d90b4946b62,d5c357fc-bade-43b7-9887-06cf1ea0daba,"2011-12-06 23:25:23",withdraw,-350

then follow 435,686.26054584 BTC and you will see another withdrawal, and again and again...
until you get here:

https://blockchain.info/eb/address/1M1ZkWpHfuQthji2AVsGDvpfY2PrcXQar6

then the wallet is split in 2 big wallets, follow the 202K one and then after several other splits you end up here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA

with 1K going to the 1933 address and the rest being used for other withdrawals

it's very likely the the 1933 address belongs to mtgox


Yes you are right this address is the proof
https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA


this is the big proof
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1HdAYY1eV6KtTDmBFefHGtHa4hEuU26G6k
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1GjdAwmUm5aMSo4v9CJzXnqYJb4bHM4HCS

Follow this addresses they are end up in 1933 address


so you think 1933 belongs to gox?
yes
this is the relation addresses
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1LceqX2YsnmuhfkUePV6M2hJP9zMoWphn
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/14yX4kRDME61BbM7DMnuv1PKUtk8K65J4y

and follow this address
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1HdAYY1eV6KtTDmBFefHGtHa4hEuU26G6k

this will end up here
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a


 
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Topic OP
MTGOX addresses they are end up in 1933 address
by
eztezt
on 24/03/2014, 12:15:11 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: MTGOX 200K to 50 BTC sum in 2k Address
by
eztezt
on 24/03/2014, 12:12:08 UTC
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: 436K Lost Mtgox BTC Splited At 2011-12-06
by
eztezt
on 24/03/2014, 10:56:07 UTC
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a is most likely a mtgox wallet
here is why:

start from here:

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q .. this is a known mtgox wallet

436K moved to https://blockchain.info/en/address/1Cj5kAeGK5CQSubY1Bk6HbGdweq15eJtH9  ..still a mtgox wallet, in fact 279.15294827 BTC is a withdrawal from one of the user in the leaked db

76b04b58-c333-44cd-a322-459fc0956800,647e689d-c56b-407a-a405-58a45b315af9,"2011-12-06 21:44:27",withdraw,-279.15294827

now let's follow 435,960.99837219 BTC

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1KNY4rzu5qDaLeqwBx4Rq9BWiDkNciUzkX ..still mtgox and you see another withdrawal (350BTC)

bb53da20-bc36-4776-894e-2d90b4946b62,d5c357fc-bade-43b7-9887-06cf1ea0daba,"2011-12-06 23:25:23",withdraw,-350

then follow 435,686.26054584 BTC and you will see another withdrawal, and again and again...
until you get here:

https://blockchain.info/eb/address/1M1ZkWpHfuQthji2AVsGDvpfY2PrcXQar6

then the wallet is split in 2 big wallets, follow the 202K one and then after several other splits you end up here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA

with 1K going to the 1933 address and the rest being used for other withdrawals

it's very likely the the 1933 address belongs to mtgox


Yes you are right this address is the proof
https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA


this is the big proof
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1HdAYY1eV6KtTDmBFefHGtHa4hEuU26G6k
https://blockchain.info/tr/address/1GjdAwmUm5aMSo4v9CJzXnqYJb4bHM4HCS

Follow this addresses they are end up in 1933 address
Post
Topic
Board Service Discussion
Re: 436K Lost Mtgox BTC Splited At 2011-12-06
by
eztezt
on 24/03/2014, 10:42:38 UTC
https://blockchain.info/en/address/1933phfhK3ZgFQNLGSDXvqCn32k2buXY8a is most likely a mtgox wallet
here is why:

start from here:

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1LNWw6yCxkUmkhArb2Nf2MPw6vG7u5WG7q .. this is a known mtgox wallet

436K moved to https://blockchain.info/en/address/1Cj5kAeGK5CQSubY1Bk6HbGdweq15eJtH9  ..still a mtgox wallet, in fact 279.15294827 BTC is a withdrawal from one of the user in the leaked db

76b04b58-c333-44cd-a322-459fc0956800,647e689d-c56b-407a-a405-58a45b315af9,"2011-12-06 21:44:27",withdraw,-279.15294827

now let's follow 435,960.99837219 BTC

https://blockchain.info/en/address/1KNY4rzu5qDaLeqwBx4Rq9BWiDkNciUzkX ..still mtgox and you see another withdrawal (350BTC)

bb53da20-bc36-4776-894e-2d90b4946b62,d5c357fc-bade-43b7-9887-06cf1ea0daba,"2011-12-06 23:25:23",withdraw,-350

then follow 435,686.26054584 BTC and you will see another withdrawal, and again and again...
until you get here:

https://blockchain.info/eb/address/1M1ZkWpHfuQthji2AVsGDvpfY2PrcXQar6

then the wallet is split in 2 big wallets, follow the 202K one and then after several other splits you end up here:

https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA

with 1K going to the 1933 address and the rest being used for other withdrawals

it's very likely the the 1933 address belongs to mtgox


Yes you are right this address is the proof
https://blockchain.info/address/1Gwi7JFpSZfemLuPWJ8zqBsRNx8GnxVjGA